• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

The Darkness and The Angelus upgrade.

Status
Not open for further replies.
352
20
Note: This is upgrade for The Angelus and The Darkness, not for Jackie Estacado who has the same profile with The Darkness

DAE1


DAE2


So, they could unravel all existence if one of them perish, as they are the primal forces of all existence.

The Question is: Should we rank them with Top Cow continuity or Image Continunity

If we rank them with Top Cow continuity, they will get 2-C, because Top Cow continuity has show to have multiple universe, with unknown number.

But if we rank them with Image Continunity, they will get 2-A

Or we should rank them as "2-C, possibly 2-A" ?
 
"All of existence" is recurrently used as a synonym for the universe. Unless a multiverse or higher dimensions are specified in conjunction, it seems far too unreliable to scale from.
 
Well, she said "All existence", not "all of existence."

From what I know, all of existence means "everything in existence" (which is most referred to the universe), while all existence means "every existence".
 
No, both tend to be used interchangeably. As I mentioned above, this seems far too speculative for us to use. I should probably close this thread.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top