- 8,438
- 3,292
Well Dark, sorry, but this Calc is not correct.
In it, you use gravity as relative to Earth (such as 0.62), which is g (little g). For GBE, you don't use little g, you use capital G, which is the gravitational constant. This number is 6.67408x10^-11 m^3/kg*s^2. So using your mass and radius, we can find the real result for Space Giant's durability.
Not only that, but the radius needs to be in meters, not kilometers.
(3*(6.67408x10^-11)*(4.4195286x10^25)^2)/(5*22043660) = 3.5482226x10^33 joules, 5-B, Planet level.
So yeah. The use of g instead of G and kilometers instead of meters lead to incredibly inflated results. I am not sure who this effects, but they are downgraded. Unless of course I am wrong.
In it, you use gravity as relative to Earth (such as 0.62), which is g (little g). For GBE, you don't use little g, you use capital G, which is the gravitational constant. This number is 6.67408x10^-11 m^3/kg*s^2. So using your mass and radius, we can find the real result for Space Giant's durability.
Not only that, but the radius needs to be in meters, not kilometers.
(3*(6.67408x10^-11)*(4.4195286x10^25)^2)/(5*22043660) = 3.5482226x10^33 joules, 5-B, Planet level.
So yeah. The use of g instead of G and kilometers instead of meters lead to incredibly inflated results. I am not sure who this effects, but they are downgraded. Unless of course I am wrong.
