-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
- Status
- 15,878
- 11,126
isn't Knightfall Anakin also substantially stronger than Normal Anakin ?
Hellbeast
He/Him- 5,067
- 4,525
Yeah I think its mentioned on the profile
I'm unsure of whether or not it'd be a "higher after becoming Sith" or if it'd simply be another key
- 15,878
- 11,126
I feel like prob another key, Anakins approach to combat changes aswell.
So Three keys for Anakin in total shouldn't be a lot right?
So Three keys for Anakin in total shouldn't be a lot right?
Hellbeast
He/Him- 5,067
- 4,525
Seems fine
Vader is probably getting three and Obi-Wan might do as well
Palpatine should probably have a few but that's just my opinion
- 472
- 175
Kinda related but I made a calc for the XX-9 Turbolaser yield assuming there were 20 turbolasers per star destroyer that created the explosion. Not much different really but it supports 6-C heavy turbolasers.
- 22,335
- 18,520
- Thread starter
- #651
We dropped it because of the inconsistent art.
Also, thee XX9s they used on Mon Cala are ventral heavy turrets, of which there are at least 2 in canon. There are also something like 8 even more powerful heavy turrets port and starboard of the bridge that you'd have to subtract. This doesn't even include all the other XX9s.
Also, thee XX9s they used on Mon Cala are ventral heavy turrets, of which there are at least 2 in canon. There are also something like 8 even more powerful heavy turrets port and starboard of the bridge that you'd have to subtract. This doesn't even include all the other XX9s.
Last edited:
- 472
- 175
Oh I just thought it was the main xx9s that did this.
- 11,099
- 4,323
how's it going on this end
- 22,335
- 18,520
- Thread starter
- #658
- 2,711
- 161
sorry, i just saw this. so, i reread the bane books, and due to what who bane is and what he represents, changes in his standings might mean change in overall standings.
i guess there are bigger changes tho. there is this thing called lfl- its pretty much what is used when new shit is introduced in the star wars universe. ragnos is the strongest sith ever when he was alive, and should be above karness muur and tulak hord, but problem is, both were created much after said statements. the licensing guys (for SW canonicity itself) say that this is a real thing. u can still argue that a new character is below an older one, but its not an instant placement. for example, sadow is meant to be above vitiate at one point, even tho sadow is incredibly weak compared to that vitiate, so it makes things weird. so lfl comes in, and we just separate the two. BUT, with tulak hord and ragnos (for example), nothing makes their placements contradictory to what statements imply or say. tulak isnt MEANT to be above him, he doesnt have the feats to above ragnos, he doesnt have the statements to be above ragnos. so it works out fine. this also works for simple statements. but with new statements that contradict older ones, there is a process- the number of times the original statement was posted/written and what not around the verse, how important it was to the verse as a whole, where it was posted (if its a movie statement for example, nothing can ever contradict it, cuz its directly from lucas), and how recent it is. sometimes, numerous older statements can be retconned due to being just way too old. they just dont match up anymore with what is in the universe.
there is also the fact that game stats can be considered somewhat canon, and are meant to be complementary to the universe's other sources. so some stats that put one character over the other can pretty easily be used to argue a character's superiority over another, so long as there arent any big contradictions with that.
Prophesied Rebuilder
FORETOLD PERFECTION: Bane of the Sith& and of the Jedi Foreword: I would like to apologize for the length of the blog. I wanted to leave no rock/stone unturned,
www.suspectinsightforums.com
that's the blog i wrote on bane, hope u guys can give it a read. sorry it took me this long to see all this
- 2,711
- 161
by far, but its not safe to assume that they are in different tiers. in SW, power usage is incredibly important. so unless one has the mindset and skill to utilize that power, they can be beaten by obi wan, for example.
- 228
- 158
I still very much disagree that the Huntress seeing Ambrias history means that it should scale to Bane albeit I only skimmed thru the respect thread. He simply doesn't have the feats to suggest such a scaling and nearly got wiped out by Zannah tapping into it, if you addressed this I didn't see, however.
- 2,711
- 161
do u know what feats ragnos, nadd, ulic, darish vol, malak, malgus, and co have? pretty much none. all of them scale over that feat tho. Bane himself thinks he is superior to all the characters i named, bar vol.
- 120
- 115
Bane gets destroyed by Thon, Ulic, Nadd, Ragnos, Malak, Malgus, Vol. Get with the program.
- 22,335
- 18,520
- Thread starter
- #671
Onto the actual point of this thread, the thermal detonator calculation has been accepted. All I need to do is clean up a couple pages and find an episode where Mandalorians destroy a Kom'rk class, and then we're golden.
- 22,335
- 18,520
- Thread starter
- #676
@Soldier_Blue How durable would something like the Twilight be?
Last edited:
- 22,335
- 18,520
- Thread starter
- #677
Ok, today is the absolute best day for me to do the revisions. If anyone has absolutely anything to say about the revisions, please say it today so I can do the changes as quickly as possible.
- 4,329
- 522
I have a few comments. Firstly shouldn’t the Darth Vader who scales above Anakin have [possibly far higher] as well? Also if Palpatine's [far higher] potentially scales above the Bendu, then why isn’t he At least 8-A, possibly 7-C+? Everything else seems solid enough.
- 22,335
- 18,520
- Thread starter
- #680
@Legion
The context of the quote itself seemed to portray Palpatine's power as kind of astronomical. Plus, Vader's inferior to Luke, who was very casually one-shot by Palpatine, so Palpatine himself should only scale above Vader in a vague way. Vader 2020 thoroughly illustrates this fact.
@Hellbeast
I was thinking about it, but there's way too many sources. Besides, it's pretty easy to search up the passages and find previews on google books.
The context of the quote itself seemed to portray Palpatine's power as kind of astronomical. Plus, Vader's inferior to Luke, who was very casually one-shot by Palpatine, so Palpatine himself should only scale above Vader in a vague way. Vader 2020 thoroughly illustrates this fact.
- “Very well,” he said. “But understand this. All the strength of the creature you faced on Atollon pales in comparison with the power of the Emperor. Are you truly willing to risk his anger?”
@Hellbeast
I was thinking about it, but there's way too many sources. Besides, it's pretty easy to search up the passages and find previews on google books.
- Status
