- 5,559
- 306
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just. Let. Spino. Wank. Die. Already. How many nerfs can this thing get before people realize it's a trash-tier theropod? Hell, I wouldn't be surprised if people said "but muh claws" if science proves that it literally had no arms. Considering how one of you legit looked at the thing and said to yourself "yeah, those things are usable in combat", you guys aren't far off from that.Armorchompy said:I forgot to consider armor, Sarco probably wins this then.
The animal is one ton more than spino. We have established that. I am just saying sarc's bight attacks aren't meant for land combat, they are meant for ambush. One bite after bursting out of the water to drag an unsuspecting dino into the water. On land it's legs are stubbier than spino's and range is limited. "No, the more logical conclusion is that a larger animal has thicker armor. What's the point of armor if its too thin for your size? Don't make illogical assumptions just because "it's possible"." Says a man making assumptions. The animals don't follow that. Just cause skin is comparable to other crocs doesn't in anyway make it thin or two thin. It was thick enough for the enemies sarco would come across. Not one specifically designed to kill armored pray. Also as a theropod, spino can stand rear up on its back legs allowing claws to be accessible, which are even able to be used on the ground. And the reason I am suggesting it will use its claws (not for everything) is due to it's bite. It isn't made to attack something like sarco, claws are kinda its best bet. And why it was better on land than sarco is because it likely spent more time there. That is pretty obvious.GoldFiend said:Are you serious? Size is determined by weight. There are at least 5 animals longer than the blue whale and yet it's still considered the largest animal. God, the stuff you say is so Elementary. No, the more logical conclusion is that a larger animal has thicker armor. Whats the point of armor if its too thin for your size? Don't make illogical assumptions just because "it's possible". The bite force of spiny is 2 tons while sarco's is 9. Its claws would be useless in this situation due their tiny reach and posture. Also, I'm done looking past that. Why do you even think spinosaurus was better at land combat? Another thing, why do keep acting as if spiny used its claws for everything instead of its jaws?