Spatial Dimensions question

[Xerkser500]

A bit confused about something, so i'd appreciate some feedback.

Lets say there's a multiverse that is 4-Dimensional and someone who can destroy it entirely. Then later on, it's discovered that the multiverse has multiple spatial dimensions to its name. At least 3 via the plural of "dimensions".

Would this make the multiverse, overall, higher-dimensional as say 7-D? And if so, what tier would someone be for being able to destroy a 7-D Multiverse?

 

[Xerkser500]

bump

 

[Wokistan]

3 spatial dimensions is what we already have, though. That's 3 of the 4 in 4D.

 

[Xerkser500]

What if there were 3 more additional spatial dimensions though? Thats my question if I didn't ask clearly enough.

Would a 4-D multiverse be more higher-dimensional if it had more spatial dimensions to it?

 

[Wokistan]

If there were 3 more then yeah I guess, but what's the specific circumstance you're wondering about? This stuff is usually easier to evaluate with full context.

Well it wouldn't be a 4D multiverse.

 

[Xerkser500]

This is just a hypothetical scenerio atm. It does involve a verse but I plan to make a separate thread for that if this thread checks out.

 

[Wokistan]

If a universe has 6 spatial dimensions and a temporal one then yeah it'd be 7D.

 

[Xerkser500]

Okay I see. So if a multiverse is already 4-D with 3 spatial dimensions and 1 temporal one, and then later it gets additional spatial dimensions, then the multiverse can be higher than 4-D?

 

[Wokistan]

Idk how you would just add spatial dimensions like that but yes, spatial/temporal dimensions are what is being referred to with whatever-D.

 

[Xerkser500]

Its not really in the sense of "adding" them but rather the multiverse is just bigger than we thought dimensional wise after further expandsion on the cosmology.

 

[Wokistan]

Yeah that would be fine, I would think. Would end up making Low 2-Cs into 1-Cs.

 

[ShadowWarrior1999]

If the multiverse is 7D then destroying it would be 1-C.

 

[Xerkser500]

Hmm...interesting.

And if the Multiverse was just 5-D at best? Would that be an upgrade to 2-A or nah?

 

[ShadowWarrior1999]

A 5D multiverse would be High 2-A.

 

[Xerkser500]

Oof. Thats quite the jump.

Got it now. Guess I will make my thread eventually then.

 

[Xerkser500]

Wait, wouldnt the multiverse have to be infinite for High 2-A?

Or is being 5-D the only thing thats required?

 

[ShadowWarrior1999]

Nope. It just has to be 5D.

 

[Xerkser500]

Ah alright then. Thanks.

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

I don't quite have the best familiarity with dimensional tiering, but I'm not sure if having more than three spatial dimensions grants "Upper-dimensional" tiering. IIRC, there are characters stated to be capable of moving across 11-dimensions, but still only have a 3 dimensional degree of power.

Destroying a universe/multiverse requires at least one temporal dimension in order for it to be Tier 2 or above as well as 2 or more temporal dimensions requiring it to be High 2-A or above. Destroying an 11-dimensional universe that has no temporal dimensions is at best High 3-A iirc.

 

[Xerkser500]

Oh yeah definitely needs temporal dimensions.

My question involves that. That if the Multiverse is considered 4-D at first with 1 temporal dimension and 3 spatial dimensions, then evidence comes to expand on the cosmology and there are more spaial dimensions to the multiverse.

 

[ShadowWarrior1999]

Spatial dimensions do grant upper-dimensional tiering.

They just don't grant immeasurable speed like how temporal dimensions do.

 

[Antvasima]

Destroying an 11-dimensional multiverse would be High 1-C.