• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Space between universes

Other members were proposing the idea that the neutral space was "indefinite intervals of 4D space", which may be the correct interpretation given its depiction.
 
Other members were proposing the idea that the neutral space was "indefinite intervals of 4D space", which may be the correct interpretation given its depiction.
Toei likely doesn't know how to depict a 5d space, having planets, stars, and galaxies in that space doesn't really mean much, it still dwarfs those 4d structures, to the point they will never collide or interact despite being held across that physical plane, which makes it 5-D, having an extra coordinate axis, as per ultima's explanation also.
 
Shouldn't the space between universe or more specifically, universal spacetimes be 5th dimensional? Because obviously time by default is infinite, relating to its "snapshots", so shouldn't a space that dwarfs a uni+ structure be 5th dimensional? A larger hypervolume doesn't really make any sense here when factoring in time, it makes sense to be a higher dimension.
It depends on whether the verse describes that void. Depending on the context, it could be in 5D, it could be in another L2C structure that is slightly larger than other space-times.
 
He was talking about this right here. And the universes in DB are currently accepted to be 2-C having 5 or 6 universal spacetimes. And yes in that space they will never touch ever, you can't even actually see them even from a very large portion of the neutral zone, yet it's shown multiple times these universes are pairs to each other, i think this qualifies for low 1-C.

So it would be 4d macrocosm, 5d neutral zone, the macrocosm having 3 spatial+1 temporal, with the neutral space just being +1 coordinate axis, a 5d space.

By this logic, literally every 2-C to 2-A would be Low 1-C
 
Intuitively it may sound like it should, but more context from the specific story should be taken into account.

Stories don't necessarily treat spaces between worlds as higher dimensional, or even if they are treated as one, it doesn't automatically make those who are able to enter these spaces to be the same tier as the space themselves. Which is kinda the issue sometimes with battleboarders saying Character A is 1-C because they went to the space between worlds when all they did was basically just to travel from one universe to the next.

So basically, just don't fall into these classic powerscaling blunders.
Of course, the most important detail in the method I have described is that there must be 4D structures in the same physical space, completely parallel to each other, separated from each other and not touching each other. And It should also be mentioned and supported in the verse. Otherwise this space/void is just a bigger 4D.
 
I believe that Ben 10 was updated with the same proposal (I think)
They have it because they have space where 2-A structures are embedded in an infinitely larger space.

and “claimed” the 2-A structures were infinitesimal within that infinitely larger space.


its the space outside the space time continum, not the contents of them
There are a lot of verses that have spaces like that
 
low 2-C structure that is slightly larger doesn't make any sense.
It’s possible.

Take these two sets: Set of Complex Numbers, Set of Real Numbers

The Complex set contains the real set and elements that do not belong in the real set.

The complex set had the sam cardinality or size as the real set.
 
It’s possible.

Take these two sets: Set of Complex Numbers, Set of Real Numbers

The Complex set contains the real set and elements that do not belong in the real set.

The complex set had the sam cardinality or size as the real set.
I doubt that is what is being conveyed in DB though, are they any verses that go by this logic
 
Back
Top