• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Could we perhaps make a Chaos Energy physiology page?
🎅 Merry Christmas Peeps! 🤶

Last comment before I take a break from the forum, if Chaos Energy does end up as UES we already have enough for a page imo:

*Aura (demonstrated by Sonic, Knux and Shadow),
*Statistics amplification (demonstrated by everyone)
*Empowerment/Rage power (demonstrated by everyone, tho most notably by Sonic)
*Energy manipulation (self explanatory)
*Electricity manipulation (self explanatory)
*Heat manipulation (demonstrated by Sonic and Knux, Shadow naturally should scale)
*Limited Technology Manipulation (Demonstrated by Sonic, tho Knux and Shadow's energy can empower tech).
*Limited Absorption (Demonstrated by Sonic and Knux, Shadow should scale).

There's probably other stuff I'm missing but you'll get the jiff, cya in the new year peeps!

Given this, yeah, but it's not a physiology page as this regards an energy source that can exist independently of the user, rather than direct physiological traits, not that this really changes much outside the page name or the innate characteristics of the energy (compared to the users).
 
Pretty sure we don't have enough users to make one, needs at least 5 iirc

Altho the DLC in Shadow Gens making both Universes connected makes me think
 
Chances are we'd have to just wait for the 4th movie for that to not be an issue at this pace.

Actually, (game) Shadow can charge Chaos Control by defeating the robots that are powered by Chaos Energy (going by their origin in the movie setting they appear to use that sort of energy like in the games) in the Tokyo stage, implying at least that the power system in the movie setting is compatible with the one in the game series.
 
From what I hear, finding a proper formula for the level of destruction the Eclipse Cannon would have caused is proving difficult
 
then why has no one calculated anything?
Brother the movie has been out like what a week and half? Do you think there is ripped footage THAT good to start using in calcs and god forbid your ass is thinking the movie will be out to stream anytime soon.

Anyways dumb question but that's why
 
Except Sonic gets hit multiple times and doesn't drop the form, plus those are all masters of Chaos Energy.
 
Why powernull? It has been shown a few times that a well-placed blow can remove the user's emerald (flashback to the owls, Knuckles and now shadow). It seems more like a weakness of the form than a hidden ability of some characters.
Has nothing to do with being a well placed blow especially given the implication that he's weak to blunt damage in Super form when that's very much so not the case. Powernull is best here
 
Just finished watching the movie, and I am seeing that there are problems with calculating the destruction of the Eclipse Cannon. Why can't we calculate it by using violent fragmentation if using GBE is too hard?
A really rough calc I did would be:
25000 miles = 4023360000 cm3.
Volume of destruction = 2.72807E+29 cm3.
Using violent frag (since Gerald says it will destroy everything in a 25000 miles radius): 2.72807E+29*69 (the value for violent frag) = 1.8823683e+31
Converted to tnt it would be = 4,4989 Zettatons.
It is a rough calc, so it is highly possible I might have made some mistake. It is still Low 5-B and the calculation is a downplay obviously, but at least it is not a Low 5-B baseline value, which I am not a big fan of since we are given some information about the feat that makes it not baseline. We are given a radius, so we can work based on that if anything.
 
Just finished watching the movie, and I am seeing that there are problems with calculating the destruction of the Eclipse Cannon. Why can't we calculate it by using violent fragmentation if using GBE is too hard?
A really rough calc I did would be:
25000 miles = 4023360000 cm3.
Volume of destruction = 2.72807E+29 cm3.
Using violent frag (since Gerald says it will destroy everything in a 25000 miles radius): 2.72807E+29*69 (the value for violent frag) = 1.8823683e+31
Converted to tnt it would be = 4,4989 Zettatons.
It is a rough calc, so it is highly possible I might have made some mistake. It is still Low 5-B and the calculation is a downplay obviously, but at least it is not a Low 5-B baseline value, which I am not a big fan of since we are given some information about the feat that makes it not baseline. We are given a radius, so we can work based on that if anything.
The low 5-B isn't baseline the planet destruction should at worst just be standard earth GBE so the value the invidiual super forms scale to is half of that since it took 2 of them to fight against the beam
 
The low 5-B isn't baseline the planet destruction should at worst just be standard earth GBE so the value the invidiual super forms scale to is half of that since it took 2 of them to fight against the beam
Okay, so the Eclipse Cannon would scale to baseline 5-B (since the GBE of Earth is 2.487e32J, which is 59,44 Zettatons and baseline 5-B) and the Supers would be half of the value, so around 29,72 Zettatons? Then I misunderstood, this seems more fitting.
 
Okay, so the Eclipse Cannon would scale to baseline 5-B (since the GBE of Earth is 2.487e32J, which is 59,44 Zettatons and baseline 5-B) and the Supers would be half of the value, so around 29,72 Zettatons? Then I misunderstood, this seems more fitting.
Yes thats what we've already been going by all this time since like the start until we find a actual better method
 
What is exactly wrong with this calculation? Call me dumb but......i don't got it with the explanations given earlier? Or is the method fine, we just need a home release of the movie for better shots of the planet?
The first calc is fine but the method he used for the second one literally cannot objectively be applicable because whats its saying is that the eclipse cannon across a 25k mile radius destroyed 2 earth sized celestial bodies which isn't the case. That's what that specifc calc method is for is calculating the destruction of multiple celestial bodies across X distance
 
Back
Top