- 9,299
- 5,762
Mufasa lost btw.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The punch analogy doesn’t work because you’re comparing thermal energy to kinetic energy. Holding back a punch stops it in its tracks, so the kinetic energy will diminish. Once you overcome the strike, you have to fight against the force of your opponent continually pushing back (which turns into a lifting strength feat).I know you aren't going to argue against it, but I think there's not much wrong with it. Your calculation would suggest they scale to 37.5x the value of the cannon (individually). If they were that much above it, they would have been effortlessly holding it back with almost no discernable effort. Yet each second of the feat took considerable effort from the two even when working together. It'd be like scaling someone to 10x the value of a punch because they can hold back the force of a punch for 10 seconds even though it is hurting them and taking considerable effort.
It being an endurance feat makes sense because they are holding back against something comparable to them for prolonged time. If they were holding back 75 separate beams simultaneously, that'd be another thing. As the energy per second would be 75x the value. But that clearly ain't the case here.
The punch analogy point is fair. I typically say instead of a punch, imagine a constant force applied to you for an extended period of time equivalent to a strong punch.The punch analogy doesn’t work because you’re comparing thermal energy to kinetic energy. Holding back a punch stops it in its tracks, so the kinetic energy will diminish. Once you overcome the strike, you have to fight against the force of your opponent continually pushing back (which turns into a lifting strength feat).
With thermal energy, heat is constantly being outputted. It’s the same reason why water doesn’t immediately turn to vapor when it’s on the stove. Thermal energy feats rely heavily on energy over time, that’s why joules per second is a real life value.
I still heavily disagree, but I yield. Rules are rules.The punch analogy point is fair. I typically say instead of a punch, imagine a constant force applied to you for an extended period of time equivalent to a strong punch.
just rewatched it. though it might be easier to scale this way, it’s just not what happens in the film. he charges it up for an unknown amount of time then the scene cuts to when he’s done. then it says 10 minutes for the beam to get ready. his whole fight with sonic and the drones happens before that 10 minutes ends.Its just infinitely better if Shadow does just supply enough energy that it takes 10 minutes for it to charge the cannon with no extra problems on the cores part if that ends up not being viable then GGs tier 5 Base but that's just how it rolls for accuracy
You wouldn't go by timeframe is the 10 minute end doesn't work btw, you'd have to go by the amount ot steps that shadow took to power it then since going off timeframe isn't indicative of the actual work done due to him running at superspeed so at worst then he'd have done 3000~4000 steps or something around that given the full distance around the ringrewatching it, the timeframe is FAR less than 10 minutes, closer to 1 or 2 although i didn’t explicitly count. the problem is super sonic and super shadow struggle to stop the beam the moment they begin.
This would be headcanon because this is never stated or implied. the machine amplifies shadows power.
The beam isn't 5-B overtime as each statement we get is that its going to be an immediate boom that will "explode everything within a 25000 mile radius" when it hits earth with the explosion killing them in space "reducing the planet to a firey pile of rubble".as we saw with the interaction with the moon, the beam isn’t emitting planet busting power per second, but rather the full yield of it at the end of its run would destroy the 25,000 mile radius stuff. sonic only withstands the beam for about a minute or 2 before he gets knocked out.
no it isn’t those are literally the only two interpretations that make sense.You wouldn't go by timeframe is the 10 minute end doesn't work btw, you'd have to go by the amount ot steps that shadow took to power it then since going off timeframe isn't indicative of the actual work done due to him running at superspeed so at worst then he'd have done 3000~4000 steps or something around that given the full distance around the ring
This would be headcanon because this is never stated or implied
I’m lost. Why is this number so specific?There's an at least 600 times gap between Super and base Shadow.
Its 10 minutes in secondsI’m lost. Why is this number so specific?