• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
This requires way to many assumptions without proof, versus thinking an universe is an universe and a multiverse is a multiverse.
I disagree. Literally the only assumption necessarily is that the word universe developed naturally in there reality and they don't somehow have access to OG's Eggman's memorys sense he would know the difference.

Where as to assume they do know what there talking about requires them to have information they literally could not get in context of the story.
 
ONly works if you have a factual proof that the Prime World is Low 2-C and not 2-C to begin with.......which given the Shatterverse, that is unlikely
Your proof for that is the Shatterverse. It's only proven to be 2-C if the shatter verse realitys are low 2-C which the default assumption for them is then being high 3-A unless proven otherwise as only them being low 2-C would prove the main universe to be 2-C, in other words this aurgment is totally irrelevant.
 
Below baseline doesn't remove the dimension of time 😭
No as the other guy says high 3-A also includes none universe sized 4D constructs, it was removed from the tiering system due to being seen as redundant information sense anything below baseline low 2-C would he high 3-A by default (I was against this I knew this would happen but it went how it went)
 
One dude really doesn't like it and is flooding the thread because of it.
It takes more then one person to have a discussion, I really appreciate making me out to be a problem, if you didn't like that discussion happening here you could have asked it to be taken to messages or another thread made for it.
 
6 times below baseline low 2-C is Tier high 3-A

No literally not that's higher 3-A
no
Because the distance between any given number of universes embedded in higher-dimensional / higher-order spaces is currently unknowable, it is impossible to quantify the numerical gap between each one of the sub-tiers in Tier 2. As such, it is not allowed to upgrade such a character based solely on multipliers. For example, someone twice as strong as a Low 2-C character would still be Low 2-C, and someone infinitely more powerful than a 2-C would not be 2-A. This does not mean that the difference between these tiers is greater than infinite, merely that the difference is unknown.
this is all that is said about multipliers in tier 2......it doesn't work, there is......literally nothing on the tier page that says anything that "6x Low 2-C is 3-A/High 3-A" so......i really dunno where you are getting this from, heck, this was the whole basis as to why Beerus and Champa's feat became 2-C before the Macrocosms were 2-C structures, you can't "multiply" down or up in tier 2, that isn't a thing
 
no

this is all that is said about multipliers in tier 2......it doesn't work, there is......literally nothing on the tier page that says anything that "6x Low 2-C is 3-A/High 3-A" so......i really dunno where you are getting this from, heck, this was the whole basis as to why Beerus and Champa's feat became 2-C before the Macrocosms were 2-C structures, you can't "multiply" down or up in tier 2, that isn't a thing
Then you'd best ask a mod. Because I completely believe I am right
 
Your proof for that is the Shatterverse. It's only proven to be 2-C if the shatter verse realitys are low 2-C which the default assumption for them is then being high 3-A unless proven otherwise as only them being low 2-C would prove the main universe to be 2-C, in other words this aurgment is totally irrelevant.
no that isn't the default assumption, they are called "Universes" in and out of the show, so they are universes and the default assumption......is that they are universes
 
no that isn't the default assumption, they are called "Universes" in and out of the show, so they are universes and the default assumption......is that they are universes
Created by one reality shattering into several, the assumption is that they are smaller then what they shattered from, and together make up what they shattered from. They could easy be discirbed as universes smaller then a normal one each one 6th the size of a normal universe. Simply using the word by characters that don't fully understand the situation isn't proof enough.

Back to your prior assertion, your basically claiming below baseline low 2-C is still considered low 2-C, implying the floor for the tier got lower and those smaller then universal sized 4D structures are still considered low 2-C, you apprenrly made this change yourself without adjusting the tiering system to discirbe that

This dosen't make the shatter verse realitys bigger, what's considered low 2-C has just gotten smaller, as such even the shatter verse together, even if there low 2-C separatly would still be low 2-C combined as you yourself expanded the tier to include those things.
 
Then you'd best ask a mod. Because I completely believe I am right
Well, you're not. 3-A is moreso the physical matter and substance of a universe. 2-C is not only physical matter + substance, but also the space-time of the entire universe. It's the difference between making a building-sized explosion and completely destroying that building's space-time. Also, making the assumption that something that is stated to be a universe is not a universe is really just headcanon and based off of nothing. There's no lore for the Eggmen exploring space and confirming or denying the existence of an expanded universe and the other Shatterspaces don't have anything that disproves them being their own universe-sized reality, either.

You're inserting these situations and concepts that both never happened and didn't exist prior to make a point you're wrong about. Why do you always come here, stand on a podium, and try to downplay Sonic feats while spouting ignorant babble? Honestly, it's starting to get vexing for everyone. It's even more absurd that you think you're in the right. Dude, just admit fault and take the L. Nobody's going to judge you for just not knowing a specific thing about dimensnionality.
 
Last edited:
I simply wasn't aware of a change.

I do this because I love sonic seeing something I consider wrong with a franchise I love hurts. You can think that means I downplay it, I want things to be right and logical.
Well, cope with the fact that you're not right because you're not some Sonic Verse Scientist, especially when everyone is legit telling you that's not how it works with receipts to back it up. The fact that it "hurts" you this much that you push so hard to be "right" is crazy work. Especially when you're, again, wrong. I WILL think you're downplaying the Verse because you are. Your logic is also false according to the tiers listed in this wiki. If you don't like it? I dunno what to tell you other than read the tiers and their functionality before hopping into an argument about them.
 
This is what I got from the thread,

Things that scale down from baseline low 2-C or high tiers are ranked by the higher tier, this is because the gaps at this point are all essentially infinte, as such it makes more sense to rate them by the end they are finitely close too

The only thing I was wrong about as far as Tiering gose is my terminology, yes the shatterverse reality's are low 2-C sense they scale relative to a low 2-C construct, however that dosen't make the base universe 2-C on it's own, there all still a 6th of the baseline and would come together as baseline, this change is essentially semantic.
 
Created by one reality shattering into several, the assumption is that they are smaller then what they shattered from, and together make up what they shattered from.
yeah, hence why the full Prime World is 2-C as the Shatterverses are called universes both in and OUT of the show by WoG

They could easy be discirbed as universes smaller then a normal one each one 6th the size of a normal universe.
exept Sonic's Universe is infinite, so each would still be infinite in size.....plus, as i said, it isn't just IN universe that they are called universes, it is out of universe as well

Simply using the word by characters that don't fully understand the situation isn't proof enough.
which is why i used the WoG of the creators of the show as well..........i even linked to you

Back to your prior assertion, your basically claiming below baseline low 2-C is still considered low 2-C, implying the floor for the tier got lower
"lower" in comparison to what? i was never given any evidence that it was ever higher to begin with

and those smaller then universal sized 4D structures are still considered low 2-C
correction, they are not smaller 4D constructs, they are full on Universes

, you apprenrly made this change yourself without adjusting the tiering system to discirbe that
no, i didn't changed anything, i simply pointed out a flaw in some profiles that was against the existing standards......which most staff agreed that it was against said standards

This dosen't make the shatter verse realitys bigger, what's considered low 2-C has just gotten smaller, as such even the shatter verse together, even if there low 2-C separatly would still be low 2-C combined as you yourself expanded the tier to include those things.
no as

1 you know i said how each Shatterspace is a full universe......yet you for some reason assume that i said otherwise here

2 the universe is infinite in size, so each "piece" which are merely 6x smaller would be infinite

and 3, multiple Low 2-C structures = a bigger, 2-C one......that is the most standard thing about tier 2

Stop with the hostile capltizitions
i am not being hostile, i am merely giving emphasis on what is important to remember, i didn't meant any hostile tone
 
Well, cope with the fact that you're not right because you're not some Sonic Verse Scientist, especially when everyone is legit telling you that's not how it works with receipts to back it up. The fact that it "hurts" you this much that you push so hard to be "right" is crazy work. Especially when you're, again, wrong. I WILL think you're downplaying the Verse because you are. Your logic is also false according to the tiers listed in this wiki. If you don't like it? I dunno what to tell you other than read the tiers and their functionality before hopping into an argument about them.
I'm sorry if I caused you distress but I'm not going to just roll over to there points if I don't think there logically correct. I can tell things are getting heated so I'll drop this here and prepare a revision, and things can continue there.
 
This is what I got from the thread,

Things that scale down from baseline low 2-C or high tiers are ranked by the higher tier, this is because the gaps at this point are all essentially infinte, as such it makes more sense to rate them by the end they are finitely close too

The only thing I was wrong about as far as Tiering gose is my terminology, yes the shatterverse reality's are low 2-C sense they scale relative to a low 2-C construct, however that dosen't make the base universe 2-C on it's own, there all still a 6th of the baseline and would come together as baseline, this change is essentially semantic.
No, you were definitely wrong before by trying to argue 6x smaller 2-C is 3-A. As well as trying to argue that something isn't what it's called by an authority higher than you while trying to inject beliefs and concepts that weren't even there before. The Sonic Verse isn't even 2-C on the Shatterverse scaling alone. Perhaps read the 2-C Sonic Upgrade Thread.
 
6 low 2-C universes are 2-C, no matter what.
Your friend literally made the revision that made that untrue


Let's be hypothetical and say a universe shattered into 100 peices and we have no more context for it then that, by the changes the other guy made to the tiering system all 100 of those fragmentation would be low 2-C, yet there still from a normal low 2-C universe this is because Omega has made it so anything downscale from any tier 2 tier or higher is that higher tier
 
I'm sorry if I caused you distress but I'm not going to just roll over to there points if I don't think there logically correct. I can tell things are getting heated so I'll drop this here and prepare a revision, and things can continue there.
You didn't cause ME distress. It just cringe seeing someone so painfully wrong while claiming they're right. You make yourself out to be some pseudo-intellectual if you keep saying stuff like that and then get proven wrong by the rules of the tiering system itself.
 
No, you were definitely wrong before by trying to argue 6x smaller 2-C is 3-A. As well as trying to argue that something isn't what it's called by an authority higher than you while trying to inject beliefs and concepts that weren't even there before. The Sonic Verse isn't even 2-C on the Shatterverse scaling alone. Perhaps read the 2-C Sonic Upgrade Thread.
the only thing I was arguing aganst what 2-C shatterverse. Not 2-C sonic

I was aurging 6 times smaller then low 2-C was high 3-A. The Last time I regularly use the wiki I would have been correct.
 
You didn't cause ME distress. It just cringe seeing someone so painfully wrong while claiming they're right. You make yourself out to be some pseudo-intellectual if you keep saying stuff like that and then get proven wrong by the rules of the tiering system itself.
Every 5th word has a spelling error I am not an intellectual
 
the only thing I was arguing aganst what 2-C shatterverse. Not 2-C sonic
Either way, assuming the Shatterverse is just "oh they're just individual planets" or pocket dimension equivalents is just pure headcanon. It is called a multiverse, so it's a multiverse. There is no more argument. Anything else is just you drumming up false reasoning.
 
Your friend literally made the revision that made that untrue
.....are you refering to me? because that isn't true

Let's be hypothetical and say a universe shattered into 100 peices and we have no more context for it then that, by the changes the other guy made to the tiering system all 100 of those fragmentation would be low 2-C
again......no, in this case it wouldn't since each piece is not called a universe, nor is the universe in question infinite.........can we talk more? cuz you are clearly not understanding the point correctly

, yet there still from a normal low 2-C universe this is because Omega has made it so anything downscale from any tier 2 tier or higher is that higher tier
.......again, no, i didn't do that, what are you talking about?
 
Your friend literally made the revision that made that untrue


Let's be hypothetical and say a universe shattered into 100 peices and we have no more context for it then that, by the changes the other guy made to the tiering system all 100 of those fragmentation would be low 2-C, yet there still from a normal low 2-C universe this is because Omega has made it so anything downscale from any tier 2 tier or higher is that higher tier
Nobody changed the tiering???? All he did was post evidence from the tiering page. What are you on about?
 
Back
Top