Notice that we're taking Piccolo's base stats and multiplying them by 4, as if Piccolo had the Kaioken. We know that Goku's base is stronger than Piccolo's base, so that boost, which makes him stronger than Piccolo's if we gave Goku the times 4 boost instead. The fact that this is a low-ball-- and that Dragon Dance has no statement going with the multiplier (if it does, then Rayquaza should have the AP advantage, based off of him having a concrete number, whereas Goku's wouldn't be)-- means Goku likely has better AP.
Don't go making another thread about how it's unfair that we use Dragon Ball's power creep. Instead, just try to make a CRT for each of those characters. Their low-balls have nothing to do with Dragon Ball. In fact, I'm so on your side, that I don't think you're explaining everything surrounding why they're not labeled as "at least" with "higher'. Because, if each of those scenarios are exactly the same as Goku's-- which, if they're not, it's a false equivalency, and an irrelevant one at that-- then they should have "at least" and "higher", on their profiles.
The only acceptable explaination they can have, when I take into account what you say, is that they don't have enough information to scale the characters in question to the higher feats or that they're no where near the higher feats in question. The former is still Shakey and could earn you a "likely" or a "possibly" somewhere in there. The latter means you don't understand the issue, which I doubt you don't, because you're a smart guy.
In either case, I agree, and likely many other people do as well, that those characters you listed deserve better. But just because they're low-balled or downplayed to an erroneous extent doesn't mean that you should do the same for Goku. If you want, you can PM me and we can come up with an argument or 3 before you make a CRT, because, I support your position-- at least from what I understand.
TL
R; those guys being whatever they are now is irrelevant.
