- 2,512
- 261
The question I mainly have is which feats are necessary to be acausal and what can, if this feats are present, actually be concluded for the characters?
Is having resistance to causality manipulation being acasual?
Would resistance to causality manipulation then imply that you won't die from having your past self killed?
If you are not damaged by your past self being killed, would that be acausal?
If so would that mean that all 2-C characters that destroyed their own original timeline to gain that rank are acausal (after all they would have destroyed any cause for their own existance to that point and, in theory, would for that moment also have destroyed all their future effects)?
Would acausality with the feat of being able to survive your past self being killed imply resistance to causality manipulation? (if that feat is enough)
I just wonder if one can logically connect such cases or if one needs to have resistance to the exact case one wants to survive for such things.
Is having resistance to causality manipulation being acasual?
Would resistance to causality manipulation then imply that you won't die from having your past self killed?
If you are not damaged by your past self being killed, would that be acausal?
If so would that mean that all 2-C characters that destroyed their own original timeline to gain that rank are acausal (after all they would have destroyed any cause for their own existance to that point and, in theory, would for that moment also have destroyed all their future effects)?
Would acausality with the feat of being able to survive your past self being killed imply resistance to causality manipulation? (if that feat is enough)
I just wonder if one can logically connect such cases or if one needs to have resistance to the exact case one wants to survive for such things.