• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

So this profile...

To be more specific:

You haven't linked any powers and ability pages

Your scaling is frankly rather bizarre, particularly with the leap to Universal, the justifications, and the next leap to multiverse level.

The speed rating (and almost everything else) have way too many numbers

And several other problems i don't think I need to point out, not the least of which being that this isn't from an officially published work of fiction, as far as my research yields
 
Yeah I highly doubt that the guy who wrote this profile could copy down those numbers exactly.

"Can summon 350,000 meteors just by using 1/1000000000000000000000000000000000000th of his power"

"Ran for about 8888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888777777777777777777778 light years in 0.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 seconds in the Universe"

And lastly the justification for the 2-B ranking in his last key:

"Stronger by 5783458765666 squared"

I REALLY want to give this the benefit of the doubt though. It's just too good.
 
And it's entirely possible that it's accurate, we just need for input on the series, so I'd like to ask him where I can find it (and whether it's a published work)
 
I mean... this is a legitimate work of fiction, as amazingly awful as it is. Don't see why it would go on JBW.
 
I know, but I had a discussion a while ago with some admins that ruled that it needs to be a published work of fiction with a certain degree of notoriety in order to be profile-worthy.

(I know because I wanted to make profiles for an obscure movie I acted in)
 
Seems like the novel is famous in Korea based on the introduction for the novel


"This is perhaps one of the most famous webnovels out there in Korea… for being so bad. It's marked as the representative of the seven forbidden texts, and it's also the very first webnovel to get a comic adaptio… I don't even k-"


Korea's renowned fantasy author, Lee Young Do (wrote Esoril's Dragon, The Bird Who Drinks Tears, and Dragon Raja), praised it for criticizing many of the novels in Korea for being so generic.
 
I'll at least add it to Joke Battles if the series isn't allowed on VSBW


I can't find the raws for it, but there's a link for it with the 6 other Forbidden Texts if you want to download it though.
 
You could change the numbers to exponent form, it makes it more organised if you decide not to delete it.

For the amount of power summoning meteors it's 1e-36 of his power.

For the light years you get 8.8888889e+87, and for the time doing it 1e-131 seconds.

And it got stronger by 3.3448395e+25 times.

Also, the book was made by an art critic and got a 4.1/5 on Goodreads.
 
ArbitraryNumbers said:
"Ran for about 8888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888777777777777777777778 light years in 0.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 seconds in the Universe"
Click to expand...
>Ran

>light years

WhatdidIjustread
 
Matthew Schroeder said:
Delete this pls.
Click to expand...
At least provide actual reasons, rather than just because it sucks, even I have to admit that the character develoment here is MLG level, however.
 
>Opens link to respect thread

>Reads some quotes from the novel

>Realizes someone really wrote this with the intention of being taken seriously

180-2


Oh man...This is how memes are made
 
This sucks, it's just a meme, it's Korean Suggsverse, self-published nonsense that is only made infamous through the internet. Has no place here,
 
If Suggs's 'wonderful' work wasn't allowed, what argument is there for a series that doesn't even try to be serious?

Just delete it.
 
I will say it looks like a joke character even though it's not. As far as I'm aware a franchise doesen't need to be of high quality to be allowed, and it still fits in our system unlike suggsverse.
 
@Ever

The Getbackers scandal wasn't the reason why the Suggsverse was made, surprisingly. The first "book" was made 1 year or so before he left the OBD.
 
A verse made by Lionel Suggs involving "omnipotent" beyond omnipotent charactsrs, are what I see upon my research once.
 
The Everlasting said:
The difference is
A. This was not made as a vendetta for vs. boards... probably.

B. This does not break our tiering system.
Click to expand...
I truly believe there should be a limit to how 'half-assed' a series can be to have a profile on this site, adding it just because it's a legit novel is the same as accepting Suggsverse - as it is, regardless of it's grotesque, unholy and incomprehensible degeneracy, a legit published novel.
 
Matthew Schroeder said:
This sucks, it's just a meme, it's Korean Suggsverse, self-published nonsense that is only made infamous through the internet. Has no place here,
Click to expand...
Not to be a bit hostile, but you can apply that any work of fiction has no place on this wiki based purely on opinion rather than whether or not it actually follows under. Profiles like this and this are on this wiki and were popularized by memes, it would be just as easy for anyone to state that they have no place on this wiki in spite of them having actual feats (Identically to the invisible dragon). While I personally think the Invisible Dragon is not good either, 'good' is an opinion. There could very well exist someone that does like it for some unknown reason. We could just as easily apply this logic to valid profiles like the Dragon Ball or Bleach ones because 'we don't like them' and whatnot.

Likewise, the profile - from a glance - seems poorly made, but I do not see a reason to absolutely and utterly purge it unless there are no explanations for the feats the dragon has, if so, then we should remove the profile and potentially recreate it later if we have evidence of various feats.


I truly believe there should be a limit to how 'half-assed' a series can be to have a profile on this site, adding it just because it's a legit novel is the same as accepting Suggsverse as it is, regardless of it's grotesque, unholy and incomprehensible degeneracy, a legit published novel.

Same thing I had stated regarding Matthew's post, 'Grotesque', and 'half-assed' as well as other statements regarding a negative viewpoint of a work of fiction.

So, to simplify, we should actually gauge whether or not this should be a profile depending on if it has evidence to support the information provided on it as well as if it is notable enough to be a profile, identically to the aforementioned profiles that were most likely inspired by existing memes (Robbie Rotten and Globglogabgalab respsectively).

Anywho, if any of the information I have provided was wrong, feel free to correct me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

ThePrimalHunter
Rules On Rematches
Replies
1
Views
550
Flashlight237
Flashlight237
Clarification Of Sentence Phrasings And Addition Of Expected Punishments For Each Type Of Rule Breach For All Rules Pages
Replies
19
Views
2K
GarrixianXD
GarrixianXD
Alien_Dual_Blaster
Doraemon Discussion Thread
Replies
8
Views
917
Alien_Dual_Blaster
Alien_Dual_Blaster
Agnaa
  • Locked
Proposal for Off-Site Links Revision
Replies
11
Views
3K
Antvasima
Antvasima
DarkGrath
  • Locked
Proposal for Off-Site Rules Revision
2 3
Replies
93
Views
11K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Back
Top