• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Small addition to Zen'ō

Status
Not open for further replies.
Then what is the justification for IZ being type 2 concept of justice and order? As it'll either give trunks and other beings in the timeline resistance towards conceptual manipulation type 2 and will imply that justice ever since IZ got destroyed ceased to exist from the timeline.
No lol, no one get resistance
 
They don't have to scale to zeno at all. It'll be that concept of justice has been destroyed and so justice should have been cease to exist. Imagine concept of time has been destroyed but we are arguing that it's form which is "time" or "sense of time" still exist.
As if anybody scaled to Zeno
 
No lol, no one get resistance
It doesn't makes sense. When abstract concept itself gets altered so their forms does and everyone thoughts, senses in the universe as well as per. If the concept of justice cease to exist then the sense of justice as well. Either they get resistance or... ¯\(ツ)
 
It doesn't makes sense. When abstract concept itself gets altered so their forms does and everyone thoughts, senses in the universe as well as per. If the concept of justice cease to exist then the sense of justice as well. Either they get resistance or... ¯\(ツ)
1. Just because it is the concept of justice doesn't mean it must be sense of justice or thought. And practially IZ was warp the universe into his very image, got erased too fast though

2. Actually no one presented in the erasure process except Zeno, Goku, Trunks etc... already retreated back to his own timeline. Only Zeno left anyway

Edit: Anyway go back to working or i will get yelled by my boss
 
Anyway, Type 3 concept seems fine as even if the concept that has been mentioned in the dragon ball as "concept of justice and order" do not meet requirement of type 2 because of its unknown nature (we don't know that even if it can affect reality and hasn't even done so, has no statement regarding how these concepts works whatsoever but just a single statement, which is not enough w/o it's nature being explained), They still has mentioned it.
1. Just because it is the concept of justice doesn't mean it must be sense of justice or thought. And practially IZ was warp the universe into his very image, got erased too fast though

2. Actually no one presented in the erasure process except Zeno, Goku, Trunks etc... already retreated back to his own timeline. Only Zeno left anyway
1. It is concept of justice, so it must affect everyone sense of judgement as per being altered or destroyed, same for being erased. Also IZ has enough of time, if he is concept of justice itself then his sense of justice would have been ruled out everyone else sense of justice, he don't have to manipulate something he himself already is.

2. Trunks apparently belongs to IZ timeline and so his sense of justice is bound to that timeline, also that goku and trunks came back to take zeno as well. Also the nature of this concept is unexplained whatsoever.
 
If you exit your timeline in DB, whatever happens to it doesn't affect you, otherwise by that logic Trunks should've been erased from existence as well.
This is expanded in the games as well.
 
If you exit your timeline in DB, whatever happens to it doesn't affect you. That's expanded in the games as well.
If you mean that nature of concept in dragonball is like altering it or anything doesn't have any effects on reality or beings with which the concept of justice is bound, then again it's not type 2. Also casualty and concept is 2 different things.. Type 2 concepts means the nature of concept should be such that affecting it directly affects it's forms across the reality.
 
If you mean that nature of concept in dragonball is like altering it or anything doesn't have any effects on reality or beings with which the concept of justice is bound, then again it's not type 2. Also casualty and concept is 2 different things.. Type 2 concepts means the nature of concept should be such that affecting it directly affects it's forms across the reality.
Yes,and that reality is the Future Universe 7. IZ only merged with a single universe/space time, not with multiple timelines or universes. That's what is accepted here.
 
Yes,and that reality is the Future Universe 7. IZ only merged with a single universe/space time, not with multiple timelines or universes. That's what is accepted here.
Yeah that is fine, but does the nature of concept of justice has been explained in dragonball as of something that altering it or messing with it changes it's forms or sense of justice across the reality? Because type 2 should be that.

W/O knowing the nature concept, it's just type 3.
 
Zamasu being the concept of justice is obviously hyperbolic lmfao.

This wiki has a serious issue with taking things too literally and it shows.
 
Type 3. Lesser Fundamental Concepts: Concepts that don't meet the same standards as Type 1 or Type 2, such as personal concepts that continue to govern the object in question, merely on a more specific scale, or concepts whose nature is not elaborated upon. Case-by-case specifications and explanations are necessary for such concepts and examples, and they are likely not going to meet the same standards for abilities such as High-Godly regeneration that other concepts may. Conceptual manipulation of this type can be resisted by those who resist sufficiently similar abilities, even if the exact mechanics may differ.

I agree with type 3.

Zamasu being the concept of justice is obviously hyperbolic lmfao.

This wiki has a serious issue with taking things too literally and it shows.
They have ******* type 1 AE on the profile for being concept nothing can be done
 
...type 1 AE comes from Zamasu embodying his own will, not because he's a concept lol.
On the profile it states that they embodied abstract concept of justice and order... Was it just written as for just a word and not in literal?
 
On the profile it states that they embodied abstract concept of justice and order... Was it just written as for just a word and not in literal?
The entire context was about Zamasu becoming the universe in order to impose his own version of justice as the only one.

Characters that embody the concept do with the TRUE version of it, not a version made from a distorted perception, unless you think Zamasu's view is the true version of justice lol.

If anything Zamasu AE should be downgraded.
 
Well, even Type 3 requires affecting the objects they governs even if on specific scale and some explaination about the nature of concept is indeed needed.

If anything, just remove abstract concept stuff from the profile, that's whole thing is definitely not serious and do not qualify as per our standards is another thing. Ideas are indeed not a concept as well.
 
I won't enter the conceptual manip debate, but I don't see how the op qualifies for Invulnerability, that just means no one in the verse can kill him, and at most it works as AP upscaling.

Also, he should just upscale from other's AP, not via resisting his own EE hax.
 
I won't enter the conceptual manip debate, but I don't see how the op qualifies for Invulnerability, that just means no one in the verse can kill him, and at most it works as AP upscaling.

Also, he should just upscale from other's AP, not via resisting his own EE hax.
you can let them talk about it lol i don't care as long as they don't fight lol
 
Well, even Type 3 requires affecting the objects they governs even if on specific scale and some explaination about the nature of concept is indeed needed.

If anything, just remove abstract concept stuff from the profile, that's whole thing is definitely not serious and do not qualify as per our standards is another thing. Ideas are indeed not a concept as well.
There is actually an explanation behind this, read my thread when I updated Zamasu and there's why it became like that.

 
Last edited:
Actually, i propose that Zen'o should have Conceptual Manipulation (Type 2), he erased IZ, and IZ is the concept itself (concept of justice and order) so it fit the conceptual destruction
I agree, make my topic your topic, anyway this should have been updated a long time ago.
 
I won't enter the conceptual manip debate, but I don't see how the op qualifies for Invulnerability, that just means no one in the verse can kill him, and at most it works as AP upscaling.

Also, he should just upscale from other's AP, not via resisting his own EE hax.
good, can you close this then? Thanks.
 
Zamasu being the concept of justice is obviously hyperbolic lmfao.

This wiki has a serious issue with taking things too literally and it shows.
̶M̶a̶n̶.̶.̶.̶.̶y̶o̶u̶ ̶d̶i̶s̶l̶i̶k̶e̶ ̶D̶B̶ ̶i̶n̶i̶t̶?̶.̶ ̶I̶ ̶r̶e̶m̶e̶m̶b̶e̶r̶ ̶y̶o̶u̶r̶ ̶f̶a̶i̶l̶e̶d̶ ̶a̶t̶t̶e̶m̶p̶t̶ ̶t̶o̶ ̶d̶o̶w̶n̶g̶r̶a̶d̶e̶ ̶X̶e̶n̶o̶v̶e̶r̶s̶e̶/̶H̶e̶r̶o̶e̶s̶.̶ ̶M̶e̶ ̶a̶n̶d̶ ̶O̶t̶t̶a̶v̶i̶o̶ ̶s̶t̶o̶p̶p̶e̶d̶ ̶y̶o̶u̶.̶.̶.̶.̶ ̶
̶ ̶

Anyways, in regards Zamasu's Conceptual existance, I remain neutral. As it seems the wiki changed standarts again lol
 
̶M̶a̶n̶.̶.̶.̶.̶y̶o̶u̶ ̶d̶i̶s̶l̶i̶k̶e̶ ̶D̶B̶ ̶i̶n̶i̶t̶?̶.̶ ̶I̶ ̶r̶e̶m̶e̶m̶b̶e̶r̶ ̶y̶o̶u̶r̶ ̶f̶a̶i̶l̶e̶d̶ ̶a̶t̶t̶e̶m̶p̶t̶ ̶t̶o̶ ̶d̶o̶w̶n̶g̶r̶a̶d̶e̶ ̶X̶e̶n̶o̶v̶e̶r̶s̶e̶/̶H̶e̶r̶o̶e̶s̶.̶ ̶M̶e̶ ̶a̶n̶d̶ ̶O̶t̶t̶a̶v̶i̶o̶ ̶s̶t̶o̶p̶p̶e̶d̶ ̶y̶o̶u̶.̶.̶.̶.̶ ̶
̶ ̶

Anyways, in regards Zamasu's Conceptual existance, I remain neutral. As it seems the wiki changed standarts again lol
man, I'm not understanding anything because of this risk in the lyrics, but it was explained why Zamasu became a concept in my publication, the quote is not a hyperbole

 
Nobody can defeat him this clearly shows his durability upscales anyone’s AP within the verse
Uh I mean... Sure ig?
I am starting to doubt what to say in what thread kinda seems all threads have their own way to go.
top right there, all these comment is so unnecessary, the thread finish its role, no need for all these unnecessary replies
Too relatable situation ngl.
 
I'll just make a CRT against Zamasu then later.
̶I̶ ̶k̶n̶o̶w̶ ̶y̶o̶u̶ ̶d̶o̶n̶'̶t̶ ̶l̶i̶k̶e̶ ̶a̶n̶d̶ ̶d̶e̶s̶p̶i̶s̶e̶ ̶D̶B̶ ̶c̶u̶z̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶Z̶e̶n̶k̶a̶i̶,̶ ̶b̶u̶t̶ ̶c̶'̶m̶o̶n̶ ̶X̶D̶.̶ ̶ ̶P̶o̶o̶r̶ ̶Z̶a̶m̶a̶s̶u̶ ̶w̶e̶n̶t̶ ̶t̶h̶r̶o̶u̶g̶h̶ ̶s̶o̶ ̶m̶a̶n̶y̶ ̶d̶o̶w̶n̶g̶r̶a̶d̶e̶s̶.̶.̶.̶I̶ ̶p̶i̶t̶t̶y̶ ̶h̶i̶m̶.̶ ̶
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top