Should Outliers be Listed on Profiles?

[Sera_EX]

I've been thinking that, considering the amount of disputes we have over outliers, if we should list them on the respective character's page (in addition to the correlating discussion rule). It seems we do, or at least did this in some form before, like the light source that's arguably a star in Kaguya's dimension for example. It's just always done so for controversial outliers in popular verses like 4-C Kaguya or 3-A Yhwach but not outliers such as the 8-dimensional barrier in Fate Extra CCC that would make BB and others 1-C out of context, which deserves to be mentioned on those profiles as to tell our visitors and members we have discussed it before. Should we do this for all major outliers or just those repeatedly debunked?

Tl;dr: Why are some outliers listed on profiles but not others?

 

[Shadowbokunohero]

Yes if the outliers are extremely popular discussed feats

>Moon level Roshi comes to mind

 

[WHYNAUT]

Yes if the outliers are extremely popular discussed feats
>Moon level Roshi comes to mind

Classic example.

 

[Shadowbokunohero]

Should we do this for all major outliers or just those repeatedly debunked?

the constantly debunked and popular ones, no need to post an obscure outlier that very little know about anyway

 

[Sera_EX]

I think any major outlier than can be drastically misinterpreted and mentioned in a CRT (thus wasting everyone's time since it's already been debunked) should be listed, not just those in popular verses or feats.

 

[SomebodyData]

This could work

Though then again Madoka and 4-A...

 

[Ultima_Reality]

I think any major outlier than can be drastically misinterpreted and mentioned in a CRT (thus wasting everyone's time since it's already been debunked) should be listed, not just those in popular verses or feats.

I completely agree with this

 

[Theglassman12]

Godoka's 2-A, it can work.

 

[TriforcePower1]

I think any major outlier than can be drastically misinterpreted and mentioned in a CRT (thus wasting everyone's time since it's already been debunked) should be listed, not just those in popular verses or feats.

Seems good, but I'd say that if the outlier isn't known much there's no reason to write it.

 

[DragonEmperor23]

Only the Major ones that cause lots of discussion without the OP knowing it's been discussed.

 

[Dragonmasterxyz]

I agree with this.

 

[Keiyu]

What's an outlier?

 

[Udlmaster]

Does that mean we see 2-A Batman? (Specter Kick) (I am kinda kidding)

 

[Sera_EX]

What's an outlier?

Outlier