• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

SCP should not be allowed on this site.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I honestly never understood why we don't accept certain characters just because they come from places where anybody can write, like, yeah, anybody can write one, but this doesn't make the original story any less legit, except for SCP, which seems to be the only exception to this, probably because its case by case.
 
Regarding the actual profiles, I think it looked like fanfiction due to how erroneous the 3167 profile actually was which confused a lot of people. Its interaction with other fictions like HP and LotR was called fictional in verse yet profile stats listed abilties and changes to these fictions 3167 made and seemed to imply it was actually utilizing and could effect the actual SCP setting with those abilities rather than the fictional setting.

It seems to be fixed now though on the other CRT.
 
StrongClick said:
Its interaction with other fictions like HP and LotR was called fictional in verse yet profile stats listed abilties and changes to these fictions 3167 made and seemed to imply it was actually utilizing and could effect the actual SCP setting with those abilities rather than the fictional setting.
Literally never was there an implication that it affected the SCP world directly outside of its mind altering effects on real life people and Text, don't know where you're getting that from but he isn't that powerful.
 
Those keys were for him being in the narrative and destroying Universes in them, which you should read the actual SCP file before trying to argue.
 
That's encapsulated fiction these are narratives it would be Tier 11... The tiering as it is now implies destroying these universes is not fictional compared to SCP verse. Essentially the profile is written incorrectly.
 
Yes but it's written from the perspective of that fiction. Like how Madotsuki has Low 2-C for destroying a dream world, because that key's from the perspective of the dream world.

The profile's written correctly but could do with the addition of a key from the main narrative perspective, where 3167 would be tier 11. This is already how profiles like SCP-2747 work.
 
There are no keys on 3167 as it is now. Ik the profile is fixed on the CRT now but before u can understand where the confusion comes from.
 
StrongClick said:
There are no keys on 3167 as it is now. Ik the profile is fixed on the CRT now but before u can understand where the confusion comes from.
It isn't fixed there either, since it ignores the statement about destroying Universes and makes him athlete level for killing a human when he struck a floor later on. Also it ignores it specifically being stated to be a shapeshifter, i could go on
 
Also people weren't complaining that he was wanked, since low 2-c isn't impressive even by SCP standards, this whole buzzstorm and strawmaning came from fiction and franchise interaction
 
By fixed I mean it has keys that show what's fictional compared to the SCP verse and what's not which was causing the confusion. What tier it should be fictionally can be discussed in that thread.
 
I think we're done here, someone should close this.

Also I pretty much disagree with this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top