Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wouldn't say that specific calculation - any calc that involves total atomic destruction when it isn't supported by evidence shouldn't be used.Crateris Aeson said:So it's just this specific feat and the calculation of this.
Your problem is the energy obtained in the calculation of this specific feat and not the description of the powers of the series.
Then we can either calc what we see or disregard the calc altogether because if we cant trust the visuals then we cant trust the crater's size either.SupremeGilgamesh said:And that the thing
Atomization exists
Atomization comes from Cosmo
Cosmo was used in that crater
Besides how do they want that in something that has NO MOTION and ONLY STATEMENTS we have to trust or bust it
Can...can you repeat the second paragraph in a slower and detailed talkXulrev said:I'm still rather enjoying the fact that the argument evolved into "We can't trust the author to draw accurate atomic vaporization, he doesn't know physics, but also we should trust the author to know what he's talking about when he implies total atomic vaporization and just ignore what he draws".
The doublethink required is immense. And still not a single person has even bothered to engage, with evidence, the issue of debris consistently existing as collateral to Saints' attacks. It's all superfluous rhetoric that tries to avoid having an evidenced point.
At this juncture, Kep's OP truly is just unassailable, or else somebody would have been able to disprove it by now instead of repeating the same tired talking points that miss the point.
I actually don't know if this is sarcasm, but sure!SupremeGilgamesh said:Can...can you repeat the second paragraph in a slower and detailed talk
....Can the OP give the scans of the size of debrisXulrev said:I actually don't know if this is sarcasm, but sure!SupremeGilgamesh said:Can...can you repeat the second paragraph in a slower and detailed talk
Nobody can disprove the OP of the thread and give scans to explain away the fact that the attack, and others like it, have debris occur as a side-effect of their happening. Attack happens ---> there's debris left over. This leaves us to infer that complete atomic vaporization is not happening within the full range of the attack, and that the actual potency/range of their atomization is extremely limited
I know this is not what you meant to say, but this sounds like you're implying only fans of a series can comment on a revision thread. That mentality has led to quite a few series being misrepresented, getting far higher/lower than they deserve.Matthew Schroeder said:What's happening here is that we have a wide range of people who are not fans of Saint Seiya suddenly taking interest in the verse and supporting a downgrade based entirely on visuals.
The real cal howard said:I know this is not what you meant to say, but this sounds like you're implying only fans of a series can comment on a revision thread. That mentality has led to quite a few series being misrepresented, getting far higher/lower than they deserve.Matthew Schroeder said:What's happening here is that we have a wide range of people who are not fans of Saint Seiya suddenly taking interest in the verse and supporting a downgrade based entirely on visuals.
Literally every verse already goes through this.Leonida85 said:Hoping that the other franchises will also have the same treatment.
Out of curiosity to how many "manga" has atomic destruction been questioned for the presence of "debris" before Saint Seiya?
Rocker1189 said:Literally every verse already goes through this.Leonida85 said:Hoping that the other franchises will also have the same treatment.
Out of curiosity to how many "manga" has atomic destruction been questioned for the presence of "debris" before Saint Seiya?
That feat is a bit out of context.Schnee One said:@Matt
There was a feat I remember long ago, that someone who was deemed unworthy of being a saint caused a hole through the earth
Matthew Schroeder said:Even if there is a downgrade, 8-C / 8-A for Bronze Saints still feels too low. Since there's a statement in the novels that no man-made weapon can compare to the power of a Saint.
Also, in the anime version of the Black Saints' arc (Which is canon for Omega since that's basically Saint Seya GT), the fight between Shiryu and Black Dragon causes volcanic eruptions to occur.
We'd of course need a large amount of context regarding that statement considering how broad and vague it is. Depending on the speaker, when this was said, and the exact wording, it might not mean anything, or it might be rather impressive.Matthew Schroeder said:Even if there is a downgrade, 8-C / 8-A for Bronze Saints still feels too low. Since there's a statement in the novels that no man-made weapon can compare to the power of a Saint.
Again I need a lot more context here. Their fight causing a volcanic eruption doesn't, in of itself, have timeframe considered, doesn't have the fact that the volcano may have been already active or semi-active, et cetera, which would drastically change how we'd rate the feat.Matthew Schroeder said:Also, in the anime version of the Black Saints' arc (Which is canon for Omega since that's basically Saint Seya GT), the fight between Shiryu and Black Dragon causes volcanic eruptions to occur.
Well, Shaka was sent by the Sanctuary to kill Jango and the Black Saints, but this does not indicate that they are a great threat or stronger that the Silver and Bronze Saints.Matthew Schroeder said:IBy contrast, in the original series the Sanctuary didn't bother to send a Gold Saint against the Main Bronzes until they had defeated 10 Silver Saints already.