- 1,967
- 1,663
tbh you could say that for a lot of franchises but canonicity is the kind of thing thats really dependent on the authors at the end of the day (except for Pokemon)There are ways to prove they’re also canon
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
tbh you could say that for a lot of franchises but canonicity is the kind of thing thats really dependent on the authors at the end of the day (except for Pokemon)There are ways to prove they’re also canon
90% written by him? is that true? if so then yeah it would undoubtedly be canon but is there like some source for that? OG authors making active suggestions and doing art isnt really unheard of but the former statement changes everything if true
eh, they all seemed like separate points to me so thats how i chose to respond
Depends on how the story pans out + the Zeus we saw was just hin possessing a body. That was it.but isnt that bad though? because Kurumada is gonna do a heaven arc for sure and i'm like 90% sure that depiction of Zeus is gonna contradict GA like how the last ND chapters did
There is plenty of verses that get special camoncity treatment loltbh you could say that for a lot of franchises but canonicity is the kind of thing thats really dependent on the authors at the end of the day (except for Pokemon)
Proving Classic is canon to everything is easier than proving the opposite, unless you think canon is a transitive property.tbh you could say that for a lot of franchises but canonicity is the kind of thing thats really dependent on the authors at the end of the day (except for Pokemon)
oh yeah that's a given. idk who would the classic wouldn't be canon to others works. i'm more so talking about the opposite, as you mentionedProving Classic is canon to everything is easier than proving the opposite, unless you think canon is a transitive property.
Classic is the “backbone” of the franchise.oh yeah that's a given. idk who would the classic wouldn't be canon to others works. i'm more so talking about the opposite, as you mentioned
i did read it yeah but it still kinda felt like the "why" component was missing. i dont know if others will get the same impression as i did because my perception of canon might be warped but idkThe sources is the totality of context on the current blog. Some changes are needed though but nothing that will impact that part of it.
well more like the fact that those points almost seemed disconnected from each other and from the actual conclusion. i don't mind the current format and it probably makes responding easier if anythingI should work in that then. Maybe all one paragraph?
i guess that's true but still it really feels like we're setting ourselves up to shoot ourselves in the foot with this, cuz from what i understand ND chap 116 kinda hinted to me that Kuru doesnt really give much of a crap about being consistent with the "successor spinoffs"Depends on how the story pans out + the Zeus we saw was just hin possessing a body. That was it.
tbh I'd argue the western comics are worse in that case. there's a reason why you have the stereotype of a comic book debater winning a debate instantly the moment they pull a panel out of some obscure 1960s comic, which was only printed 40 times in total, where the character they're arguing for is a multiversal God or something.There is plenty of verses that get special camoncity treatment lol
Anime vs manga vs light novel vs web Novel. The eastern media is littered with it
Anime vs manga vs light novel vs web Novel. The eastern media is littered with it
Was one until o lost my F/go account. Took a break playing iy and forgot my infoYou can't forget Visual Novels Unshakable, how could you! You're a Fate Stay fan!
Already explained, Kurumadas writing and involvement is >90%i can already understand classic (and even ND) being canon to everything. that's pretty much a truism. I'm more so talking about the other way around as Hasty said, why do we inherently assume that the reverse also holds true?
still waitin on a source for thatAlready explained, Kurumadas writing and involvement is >90%
It's the totality of the context pf all evidence presented alreadystill waitin on a source for that
It's the totality of the context pf all evidence presented already
Simply for that, no lolSo long as we get tier 1 Chadanus idc about canon
Dead spirit Uranus solos most of the verseSimply for that, no lol
Depends on what’s accepted as low 1-Cwouldn't Zeus be low 1-C at least?
low 1-C U7Depends on what’s accepted as low 1-C
When they get Immeasurable Speed =Plow 1-C U7
When they get Immeasurable Speed =P
see the note at the end of Goku's profile, its accepted, its just an "outlier"
Of course I'm aware, that our Lord and Savior Goku is so powerful the Wiki fears it's power and tries to restrict him as much as possible in denial of the truth.
As far I know, from some light looking around, that’s just kinda how the site treats it. If there’s some argument for canon, and there’s no reason for it to be noncanon, it’s seemingly generally accepted to be the same canon. To go back to the DBH example from a while back, there are definitely reasons for it to be non canon.i can already understand classic (and even ND) being canon to everything. that's pretty much a truism. I'm more so talking about the other way around as Hasty said, why do we inherently assume that the reverse also holds true?
with what Hasty and i talked about, low 1-C U7 is closer to reality than you might think
probably after, a key revision has to pass before it but once it does, DB would pretty much be a textbook example that qualifiesThey'll continue to deny our Lord's power you'll see
Edit on a serious note will you try it before Daima or after it begins?
but why? like from my research its just something everyone accepted cuz....Matt said it, and even though some of his problems were later rectified by Hasty, we still keep this but without an adequate explanation or reason?As far I know, from some light looking around, that’s just kinda how the site treats it.
to my knowledge, inconsistencies usually are grounds for rendering something non-canon, how significant they are is a different debate but that's what i've seen in most threads, especially DC threads.If there’s some argument for canon, and there’s no reason for it to be noncanon,
if the argument is that the author never worked on it, then yeah sure you could say DBH would be non-canon (although Dragon Ball Online is pretty much all Toriyama, so isnt that canon?) by this standard (which is like the usual standard anyway) but then this would mean that other stuff that the author has had more than a non-trivial influence on or has done more than a non-significant amount of work for, would be considered canon for pretty much any verse barring major inconsistencies.it’s seemingly generally accepted to be the same canon. To go back to the DBH example from a while back, there are definitely reasons for it to be non canon.
It does not have, literally every spin-off only has Kuramada's right, like any official work, Kuramada didn't work on any spin-offs, everything is the work of third parties, the only thing he has more involvement in is classic Saint Seiya and ND, other than that, it's all parallel worlds that don't coexist in the same main story.still waitin on a source for that
The new official website (which I think went offline recently?) Listed Kurumada as the author and writer fir every work. Ot dod not say "original creator" it full in said "author and writer" and then Okada, shirori, Suna etc were quiet literally listed as artist, or "cartoonist"i mean i'm definitely not opposed to it if there's actual strong evidence to consider everything canon and cross-scalable, or a good reason, i just haven't yet seen it and this is after I took a lot of time to read and understand the canon blog.
but as i thought unfortunately, the reason its treated that way here is mostly because....it just kinda is, as @StekFence said and i dont think that's a good thing personally.
Of course, that's right about him, that doesn't make it canon since his name is even in games, the same things happen with any franchise.The new official website (which I think went offline recently?) Listed Kurumada as the author and writer fir every work. Ot dod not say "original creator" it full in said "author and writer" and then Okada, shirori, Suna etc were quiet literally listed as artist, or "cartoonist"
but we know that's not really true though. Okada and Shiori for sure wrote a majority of it themselves as far as i've knownThe new official website (which I think went offline recently?) Listed Kurumada as the author and writer fir every work. Ot dod not say "original creator" it full in said "author and writer" and then Okada, shirori, Suna etc were quiet literally listed as artist, or "cartoonist"
Except there is direct statements that says he wrote G, LC, etc.Of course, that's right about him, that doesn't make it canon since his name is even in games, the same things happen with any franchise.
That's a common misconception actually, and is actually falsebut we know that's not really true though. Okada and Shiori for sure wrote a majority of it themselves as far as i've known
how so?? isnt the reason Kuru chose to let Okada handle the prequel stuff because he couldnt really write it at the time?That's a common misconception actually, and is actually false
There is absolutely nothing claiming that he wrote anything, just that he let writers do whatever they want with their spin-offExcept there is direct statements that says he wrote G, LC, etc.
Because that's not how canon, they have different stories, different cosmology, it is only official like any media and contains the name of the creator at the end, that is not enough to be canon.Why are we changing the rules of what can and cannot be canon?
Yes, but he wrote tge dialouge.how so?? isnt the reason Kuru chose to let Okada handle the prequel stuff because he couldnt really write it at the time?