Because I wasn’t fully aware of what HDE actually entailed (I thought this meant simply existing in a higher dimension, not literally being infinitely big and 5-D sized) to realize how wrong what was being argued in that thread was, nor was I aware of the Wiki standards about spatial dimensions and R>F to actually merit this (where in this case it’s simply a higher level of consciousness/mind) or the standard for higher plane statements needing to evaluated with in story context. And no, none of the points brought up here were disproved in the other thread or even brought up.
Every point is in the OP and addressed accordingly. The thread is also linked in the top comment.
I can explain once I'm in a good spot. Irl stuff going down.
The OP doesn't explain what is considered 4-D existence in the verse.
wdym?
To reword it, are there characters that would fit in between those of 3-D existence and the proposed 5-D existence? If so why?
Tiering wise? Yes, those who scale to the BB and above without clear 5D superiority would fit within that range
Well, there's actually no such thing ever really even alluded to in the verse in the first place as far as I can tell.
I don't see why or how so, no.
And this puts the problem in perspective well, a proposal like that was ridiculous guesswork and this mental plane doesn't even have a description of being above space and time whatsoever.
This is AP, not existence.
Can you elaborate on the BB and reasoning for 4-D existance?
I was speaking power wise, not existence wise.
So, are there beings with 4-D existence in the verse?
No, but that's irrelevant to the argument.
None that are confirmed 4D no
Tbh with my revisions that may see a change in the future
Could you tag another team member bro? Here's short of supportive members.
Greatly appreciate the input. Would you be able to help me with one more thing in calling any available staff well versed with dimensional stuff to evaluate this further or let me know who else to go to? I'm relatively new to making CRTs and not sure who to contact.
I'll call one more member of the team so he can give his opinion.
Just one more, since it's not such a popular verse.
It's controversial. Regardless of popularity.You'll likely need more. Anythibg tier 1 is controversial. Also, there's a team on discord developing a Google doc wprths of counter arguments.
For two mini chapters worth of material? The OP in itself goes over pretty much every line in them remotely related to this topic, I'd think it'd be simpler to just tackle them directly if there're any grievances, which no one's still taken up. The 48 hour grace period passed long ago. Feel free to post it though, while I look for more staff in the meantime.
Which isn't an issue at all here, the raws for every statement used are linked along with doubly verified translations by ExecutorN0 and on the onsite translation thread. It's coming off as baseless skepticism at this point.
No baseless skepticism, I was giving you benefit of the doubt.
Cool. Then I don't see what issue there is to have. The scans are linked, with both Spanish translations used being verified by credible translators here. The context is literally as clear and straightforward as it can be. You don't even need to read the dialogue to gather what's being said here, just looking at the panels shows what's being argued quite clearly about it being a mental plane shaped by their thoughts.
Any arguments that don’t require reading the context clearly isn’t relying on any actual basis but relying on people’s willingness to agree for agrees sake.
I'm just saying that what's being argued is that explicitly shown through panelling alone, though the pretty direct dialogue does make it quite more coherent, yes.
