• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Sailor Moon lifting strength downgrade?

Status
Not open for further replies.
1,047
2,399
This is the current justification for immeasurable lifting strength on the Sailor Moon profiles.
(As big as the Galaxy Cauldron and is one with it); (Is one with the Galaxy Cauldron, a four dimensional structure linked to other parts of the space-time continuum)
However, as of this staff discussion, immeasurable lifting strength was revised with this note:
When Lifting Strength allows lift or move a space-time continuum / an area of space that is [[Tiering System FAQ#Q: What is qualitative superiority?|qualitatively superior]] than an infinitely-sized 3-dimensional space, and up to any bigger, more complex structures. This spaces don't inhereditary have a weight on this level opposing any force trying to move them (Unless specific franchises may have it as such), meaning that simply being as large as them doesn't grant this level of Lifting Strength, it needs to be proven through [[feats]] or [[Powerscaling|scaling]].
In short, I don't think the Sailor Moon profiles meet the standards for immeasurable lifting strength any longer.
 
This seems relatively straightforward, but I will wait to see if anyone has counter-arguments.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top