- 11,801
- 7,364
Prefer AKM's version tbh
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So what does that mean in practice? Is somebody willing to write a new draft based on the preceding ones and what Medeus and KLOL said?I also think KLOL and DDM make sense here.
I'm fine with AKM's draftWhat do you think about this?
Same.Agreeing with what KLOL/DDM have said.
Furthermore, adding a link to a respect blog or character analysis video of a Vs debating series with the intention of having quick access to a large collection of feats is fine, but each of those feats should be analyzed step by step to ensure they are within context, and any calculation dependent feats should be recalculated to ensure accuracy.
@AKM sama @Elizhaa @Confluctor @Qawsedf234 @Damage3245 @The_Impress @ElixirBlue @Maverick_Zero_X @Mr._Bambu @DemonGodMitchAubin @KingTempestThank you for helping out.
I have provided a combined and cleaned up draft text below, but would appreciate help with improving on the flow and avoiding redundancy through repetition.
"Please refrain from creating content revision threads that consist solely of links to off-site sources (such as Youtube, Reddit, other VS forums, etc.) and have no discernible arguments of their own. Many of these sources are not made with our specific standards in mind, lack proper source references, and may contain a lot of arguments that have already been discussed or are useless for the purpose of the relevant threads, which makes them hard to evaluate. As such, it is highly encouraged that when creating a content revision thread based on off-site sources, our members should specify their core arguments in detail with relevant evidence. It is also acceptable to post such threads in the general discussion or questions and answers sections of our forum for discussion, rather than in the content revision section. Furthermore, adding a link to a respect thread or character analysis video with the intention of providing quick access to a large collection of feats is acceptable, but each of those feats should be analysed step by step to ensure that they are not presented out of context, and any calculation-dependent feats should be placed in wiki blog posts and evaluated by our calc group members to ensure sufficient accuracy."
@Theglassman12 @CrimsonStarFallen @Abstractions @DarkGrath What do y'all think?@AKM sama @Elizhaa @Confluctor @Qawsedf234 @Damage3245 @The_Impress @ElixirBlue @Maverick_Zero_X @Mr._Bambu @DemonGodMitchAubin @KingTempest
What do you think about this draft? Should it be modified further?
They did have experience dealing with such threads tho, specifically the DMC thread (Glass, Abstractions and Grath specifically)They haven't posted in this thread previously, so it seems unnecessary to call for them, but oh well.
Case-by-case basis. As long as the translation is accurate and represents a clear picture with no purposeful mistranslations on sight and is not simplified for the sake of better adaptation to the Western market (Even official translations can do some Japanese words injustice), I think it should be fine.hello i know this is a staff discussion but just wanna ask something.
is translation off-sitesuch as u/translationalso affected?
Perfect@AKM sama @Elizhaa @Confluctor @Qawsedf234 @Damage3245 @The_Impress @ElixirBlue @Maverick_Zero_X @Mr._Bambu @DemonGodMitchAubin @KingTempest
What do you think about this draft? Should it be modified further?