Their ban is listed as being at their own request, and their older ban links to an RVR page that doesn't seem to mention them. I figure it wouldn't need an appeal if that was all, so what were they banned for? The name does sound familiar as someone who got in trouble.Hello everybody.
GodlyCharmander has waited roughly yet another year and wonders if he can please get unbanned now.
I personally think that he has been punished more than enough and can have his ban removed now.
While I don't know the original ban reason, he has been banned for using a sock-puppet account.
2 years ago (Yellow_Topaz), 3 that i am aware of.
Did long ago.
Yeah... however he definitely is with spiteful ill intent. I already did talk with @DarkDragonMedeus, and the guy's claims to have changed are just bullshit.
AKM long commented on it (my memory is sharp), i think he is not bothered by Godlycharmander rant and its been really really long to bother him about it again.
While we do not agree, your reasoning is duly appreciated. I mean that sincerely, though text may be inadequate to properly show that.
With all due respect, Strym, the same question would have applied to you. You've been on the burner for flames and heated discussions as well. It falls to us to weigh whether and when to forgive someone for their errors.Yeah... however he definitely is with spiteful ill intent. I already did talk with @DarkDragonMedeus, and the guy's claims to have changed are just bullshit.
His last appeal was in April 30, 2025, however after that he did do some things that don't quite tell that he's changed. If anyone knows Charmander, it's pretty notable that he is pretty "passionate" regarding Undertale and Deltarune, verses where in both his main account and all of his socks (@TioKill, @Sans015 and @The_Yellow_Topaz) he was really, really adamant in argiung against them being high-tiered, and had multiple headbutts with me in all of these accounts ever since 2022.
So I decided to look around, and I discovered that he's the administrator of a portuguese powerscaling wiki, where he made some blogs that pretty much scream "wow I really really hate this guy for his Undertale takes":
Now, I know that these all sounds like a large poisoning the well, but the following screenshots kinda do tell me that this stuff is deliberate and wanting to pretty much target me across threads just to get rid of my "Undertale wank" in last September:
- A debunk against an Undertale High 8-C+ feat made in June 23, 2025 (around a month and hald after his appeal): The entire blog targets this old calculation I made just for the sake of debunking the verse given that at the time it was the highest Tier 8 feat of the verse.
- A debunk on Undertale cosmology made in July 2, 2025 (2 months after his last appeal): Charmander and all of his socks were all pretty stubborn in arguing at the time that the verse should not be 2-B but just 2-C, these same argument he made acorss threads here target the blog that both me and Roachman made. The blog also has its own english section, meaning it was aimed to more than just a portuguese audience.
This also doesn't help given that he's pretty much admitted to stalk me on the verse and even tried to use staff as proxies for his downgrades (here and here).
So what is exactly good with taking him back? Just so we get flames and heated discussions that were the thing that led him to be banned even back then? You all are just getting manipulated from this guy, he's definitely deliberate and malicious, especially towards me.
Yes, I do see and appreciate the difference that is made by timing and severity. The last offense was a year ago, the rant was years ago, and even the post against them contains a promise not to make more socks which seems at a glance to have been kept. I also agree that Strym's post seems to mostly revolve around their disagreements on Undertale, and to be honest that post makes me more inclined to support a second chance rather than less.
I literally was not reported from over a year here. Last time I got that was in late 2024 over a Smash Bros CRT lol.
If you want more recent ones, here are others showing this kind of obsession even going to last January:
We don't accept toxicity, but disliking fellow members is not a rule violation. This post just shows a desire to come back and make changes to a verse.
It's not a matter of him wanting to change stats, it's a matter of him still having that bitterness he had against me back then, and not really having changed,
My point exactly, actually. The leopard can change his shorts. You, specifically, were reported many, many, many times for causing problems, and yet, here you stand. Why not GodlyCharmander? Why not give the least bit of a try? That is my feeling on it, anyways, after so long being banned.I literally was not reported from over a year here. Last time I got that was in late 2024 over a Smash Bros CRT lol.
If you want more recent ones, here are others showing this kind of obsession even going to last January:
It's not a matter of him wanting to change stats, it's a matter of him still having that bitterness he had against me back then, and not really having changed,
Here is everything:
As far as I can tell, that is the discussion in which one of GodlyCharmander's sockpuppet accounts was banned, not the discussion in which they were originally given their ban.Here is everything:
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
UeTa also repeatedly made "threats" of some sort against the wiki, like the following. She was also active in a server I'm in, where she said this. Things like this should 100% not be acceptable, and I don't see any reason to bring her back Edit: Plus, she'd already planned to return with like...vsbattles.com
Godlycharmander was initially banned for this rant towards AKM, i haven't looked at it again but if my memory serves me right then he was banned for a year. I even remember it was after one dragonball thread that AKM reopened right after it was closed due to sufficient staff approval because he disagreed with the results of it, that led to rejection of that thread which it seems didn't fit well with charmandar. In all of his socks he has been consistently toxic and agressive. If needed, i can likely get other RVR related activities related to his socks.
This is pretty much the timeline of events: https://vsbattles.com/threads/rule-violation-reports-new-forum.107529/post-6552746
Considering their messages about Strym's revisions in January and earlier, wouldn't this mean that that's a blatant lie though? You wouldn't know about the changes on VSBW without visiting it and if he visited it then the appeal message already contains a lie.
True. I could write this off as just rounding if there were only the earlier messages, but if Strym is correct that this message screenshotted was typed in January this year, then I'd be inclined to think they have checked the website in the past few months. It's a minor thing, but does call into question why they would have said as much in their appeal message.
See, this is my issue here.
About his lastest discord comment, i can't say anything about it since it lack context idk, but i will just point out in general that everyone having bias, we can't stop that and can't police people over it, and even if they was bias, if they raises correct issues that need to be addressed, then we can't do anything other than addressing them.
As i have said in this post, if he come back, i recommend to put him under strict observation, if he actually improving, we can loosen our restrains over him over time, but if he do not change and one rule violation, i propose instant ban
The last time that occurred, at least according to what I've seen referenced on this thread, was quite a while ago.
Change does take time, yes. That's why this is only being brought up now, down the line.
To be clear, their exact wording was:
I think this is probably factually incorrect, if what we know from the above matters stands. It leads me to bode poorly on the nature of the appeal, but this is a tangent to the matter. There are numerous explanations you can concoct for why this happened, some of which are more denigrating to the appeal than others. It doesn't prove that GodlyCharmander will violate our rules if they return to the site.
This is extremely pessimistic, and I think you're asserting this string of events will occur because Vzearr's case is fresh in your mind, not because of a fair evaluation of the evidence.
Left a comment.I would like to ask if this thread could be supervised, as it is getting more toxic by the second.
Ayanokouji Full Strength Contextualized
I finally fixed the full scaling chain and the statement below will be used as the benchmark statement for my entire premise that the verse is mainly separated by experience, and that Ayanokouji is not physically superior to every single character, he is only more skilled, smarter with better...
It's mostly about @Buzzflightyear
