• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

I don't know if you can delete a user's profile on vsbattles, but I'd like you to delete my profile and the fandom here for me, I've lost interest in using the site and I'm not willing to come back here anymore, I'm also very busy, thank you.
image.png


totally didn't steal this from ant lmfao
But do take care of yourself.
 
I don't know if you can delete a user's profile on vsbattles, but I'd like you to delete my profile and the fandom here for me, I've lost interest in using the site and I'm not willing to come back here anymore, I'm also very busy, thank you.
I cannot delete your Fandom account, and would much prefer to ban that and your VSBW Forum account rather than delete the latter, as deleting accounts is potentially very dangerous and cannot be undone. 🙏
 
Okay. I will do so soon then.

Please try to take good care of yourself, and you are always welcome back here if you change your mind. You should contact me or another administrator or bureaucrat via Community Central in that case. 🙏❤️💖
 
Okay. I will do so soon then.

Please try to take good care of yourself, and you are always welcome back here if you change your mind. You should contact me or another administrator or bureaucrat via Community Central in that case. 🙏❤️💖
Just want to quickly ask for clarification purposes:
Are punishment (warning, mute, ban, etc) trackers publicly visible to the community or privately visible to staff? I know about warning trackers being visible to the community, not sure about the mute or ban trackers though... (I haven't seen links for those so yeah.)
Mostly curious cause, since there's both bans due to actual misconduct and breaches of rules and user-requested bans, I wanted to ask how those two bans are differentiated in the trackers as well as whether the public/community is informed in said trackers as to whether the ban was requested or due to actual misconduct/rule breaches.

(Also cause I notice there's no indication of staff retirement being due to general inactivity, self-request or misconduct/rule breaches from them in the VSBW Staff page, not sure if there's separate trackers for them or if they share the same trackers as general community members and whether said trackers are thus also publicly visible to the community or private to staff.)
 
Just want to quickly ask for clarification purposes:
Are punishment (warning, mute, ban, etc) trackers publicly visible to the community or privately visible to staff? I know about warning trackers being visible to the community, not sure about the mute or ban trackers though... (I haven't seen links for those so yeah.)
Mostly curious cause, since there's both bans due to actual misconduct and breaches of rules and user-requested bans, I wanted to ask how those two bans are differentiated in the trackers as well as whether the public/community is informed in said trackers as to whether the ban was requested or due to actual misconduct/rule breaches.

(Also cause I notice there's no indication of staff retirement being due to general inactivity, self-request or misconduct/rule breaches from them in the VSBW Staff page, not sure if there's separate trackers for them or if they share the same trackers as general community members and whether said trackers are thus also publicly visible to the community or private to staff.)


Oof I should have checked the Fandom pages before asking, but I would still want to ask about whether there are differences in the Fandom and Forum trackers as well as whether staff and general community members have separate trackers or if they both are tracked the same way with the same trackers.
 


Oof I should have checked the Fandom pages before asking, but I would still want to ask about whether there are differences in the Fandom and Forum trackers as well as whether staff and general community members have separate trackers or if they both are tracked the same way with the same trackers.
To add to this (and please don't respond further, unnecessary clutter to the RVRT, etc etc), the warning tracker is an impromptu solution we have. It is publicly visible and can be found here. Because it relies on individual staff members updating it manually, it is desperately out of date, but it does give us background information for those cases that do get added.
 
Yes. Continuous help from our staff members with updating it is extremely appreciated. 🙏
 
ZcH0yya.png


On Juneteenth is abysmal
 
On Juneteenth is abysmal
This is extremely similar to the recent case, so my opinion is the same:

Calling another member a slur probably warrants at least a 1 month ban for toxicity and/or bypassing the filter.

Anticipating objection: Yes, I know black people sometimes use it without any malice intended. However, it's extremely common knowledge that you can't use slurs at all on most platforms with general audiences. The fact that they bypassed the filter shows they knew we didn't allow it and went out of their way to type it anyway. If they were genuinely racist I would vote for even longer, but I doubt it- and think 1 month is simply the proper level of harsh but fair to properly discourage the use of slurs as heavily as we should.
Yes. Continuous help from our staff members with updating it is extremely appreciated.
🙏
Ideally, whoever applies a punishment should simply update it when they do, which is what I've been doing for warnings I give myself, for example.
 
Last edited:
I will like someone to intercede here.

A translator mod asked for a raw scans of a page here. They then took the scans and posted in the translation thread. Which is fine.

However, the are asking an extremely leading question. Nowhere my original page or any pages did we say the scans use the word concept or dimensionally. This extremely dishonest behavior.
 
Last edited:
However, the are asking an extremely leading question. Nowhere my original page or any pages did we say the scans use the word concept of dimensionally. This extremely dishonest behavior.
Nowhere in my post will you find me mentioning the “concept of dimensionality”. First, I asked if they were talking about the concept of space time (as I’m under the impression you have to transcend those and not just “space and time” for it to qualify as higher than Low 1-C).

I also asked if the wording of the transcending is meant to mean in reference dimensionally, vs something like just being vastly stronger than, above, or having complete control over. I did not mean for this to be a leading question, nor for it to mean me asking if it transcends dimensionality, sorry if my wording was confusing.

However, what I will absolutely admit fault for was putting the translation request immediately after you graciously posted the raws, which you did mention were hard to obtain. In hindsight, it comes off as almost antagonistic and impatient, and I probably should’ve mentioned something in the thread prior to doing so. For that, I am sorry.
 
Nowhere in my post will you find me mentioning the “concept of dimensionality”, as you put it. I asked if they were talking about the concept of space time (as I’m under the impression you have to transcend those and not just “space and time”).
typo, meant to write "or"

However, what I will absolutely admit fault for was putting the translation request immediately after you graciously posted the raws, which you did mention were hard to obtain. In hindsight, it comes off as almost antagonistic and impatient, and I probably should’ve mentioned something in the thread prior to doing so. For that, I am sorry.

Okay. Thank you. Sorry. I may have been hasty myself. But it really did come across as hostile to me as people on this site have been found forging scans and faking translations. The way you worded the question came across as accusatory for me.
 
Okay. Thank you. Sorry. I may have been hasty myself. But it really did come across as hostile to me as people on this site have been found forging scans and faking translations. The way you worded the question came across as accusatory for me.
Yeah, again that’s my bad. I swear I did not think you or anybody involved had any sort of malicious intent; I just knew that often, transcend specifically is a finicky word in Japanese, and I became skeptical of it (probably because of Dragon Ball lol). Anyway, probably best to put this behind us.
 
This is extremely similar to the recent case, so my opinion is the same:

Calling another member a slur probably warrants at least a 1 month ban for toxicity and/or bypassing the filter.

Anticipating objection: Yes, I know black people sometimes use it without any malice intended. However, it's extremely common knowledge that you can't use slurs at all on most platforms with general audiences. The fact that they bypassed the filter shows they knew we didn't allow it and went out of their way to type it anyway. If they were genuinely racist I would vote for even longer, but I doubt it- and think 1 month is simply the proper level of harsh but fair to properly discourage the use of slurs as heavily as we should.

Ideally, whoever applies a punishment should simply update it when they do, which is what I've been doing for warnings I give myself, for example.
If not a ban then a powerful warning but a ban should be fine
 
This is extremely similar to the recent case, so my opinion is the same:

Calling another member a slur probably warrants at least a 1 month ban for toxicity and/or bypassing the filter.

Anticipating objection: Yes, I know black people sometimes use it without any malice intended. However, it's extremely common knowledge that you can't use slurs at all on most platforms with general audiences. The fact that they bypassed the filter shows they knew we didn't allow it and went out of their way to type it anyway. If they were genuinely racist I would vote for even longer, but I doubt it- and think 1 month is simply the proper level of harsh but fair to properly discourage the use of slurs as heavily as we should.
Yes. Agreed. A 1 month ban seems reasonable based on the above.
Ideally, whoever applies a punishment should simply update it when they do, which is what I've been doing for warnings I give myself, for example.
Thank you. That is very appreciated. 🙏
 
I do not remember this user or how or why they were banned.

Though, actually, I double checked reasons, but neutral overall. His ban lasted 10 and a half months already, so it's not too far away relative to how long.
See here for information please:

 
I do not remember this user or how or why they were banned.

Though, actually, I double checked reasons, but neutral overall. His ban lasted 10 and a half months already, so it's not too far away relative to how long.
See here for information please:

We still need to handle this issue. 🙏
 
This is extremely similar to the recent case, so my opinion is the same:

Calling another member a slur probably warrants at least a 1 month ban for toxicity and/or bypassing the filter.

Anticipating objection: Yes, I know black people sometimes use it without any malice intended. However, it's extremely common knowledge that you can't use slurs at all on most platforms with general audiences. The fact that they bypassed the filter shows they knew we didn't allow it and went out of their way to type it anyway. If they were genuinely racist I would vote for even longer, but I doubt it- and think 1 month is simply the proper level of harsh but fair to properly discourage the use of slurs as heavily as we should.
Yes. Agreed. A 1 month ban seems reasonable based on the above.
This as well. 🙏
 
He was originally banned for picking fights. I don't mind granting an appeal with only two months of his sentence left to go.
I'm fine with that too.
This is extremely similar to the recent case, so my opinion is the same:

Calling another member a slur probably warrants at least a 1 month ban for toxicity and/or bypassing the filter.

Anticipating objection: Yes, I know black people sometimes use it without any malice intended. However, it's extremely common knowledge that you can't use slurs at all on most platforms with general audiences. The fact that they bypassed the filter shows they knew we didn't allow it and went out of their way to type it anyway. If they were genuinely racist I would vote for even longer, but I doubt it- and think 1 month is simply the proper level of harsh but fair to properly discourage the use of slurs as heavily as we should.

Ideally, whoever applies a punishment should simply update it when they do, which is what I've been doing for warnings I give myself, for example.
Agreed
 
Reporting @ARCH0207 for continued pestering of me despite my direct statements that I do not wish to speak to them over the course of months. There's been many other instances of me stating that I don't want to be contacted by them. It is a simple and easily fulfilled request. However, at times, my wiki duties lead me to interfacing with some thread or another where ARCH has made a proposal, and every time, in spite of my instructions and clearly laid out wish to not be contacted further, it is met with more requests, more reaching out. I have said for the past few times that I would report him if it continued, and since those warnings were not fulfilled, I feel forced to finally actually do it.

I do not want to drag this out, I just want to do my thing on the wiki without wasting time. A warning in an official capacity can suffice.
 
I do not want to drag this out, I just want to do my thing on the wiki without wasting time. A warning in an official capacity can suffice.
An official warning seems appropriate here, and if the issue persists after that, it may be escalated to a harsher punishment.

By the way, I was told that I have a pending report to resolve.
As for my report, I would permanently ban Echitesu's account, and if it were up to me, I would ban NousGalia as well, since Echitesu proved to be a troll and toxic, but that would be me and my bias. If we are reasonable, then as Medeus says, a 3-month ban would be appropriate.
Ant told me that if Echitesu was an active troll, then in addition to permanently banning Echitesu's account, a less lenient ban would be applied to NousGalia's account, but I feel that what I consider to be trolling and an active target against my verse may not be seen that way by others (although creating an alt just to disagree and act like a troll gives me a lot to think about, smh).

Anyway, the current result would be to permanently ban @Echitesu's account and @NousGalia's account for 3 months, tho it seems that they simply left the site based on the date of their last connection after being exposed.

So, if no one disagrees, I think it would be appropriate for me to apply the ban. Do you have anything to say?
 
Ant told me that if Echitesu was an active troll, then in addition to permanently banning Echitesu's account, a less lenient ban would be applied to NousGalia's account, but I feel that what I consider to be trolling and an active target against my verse may not be seen that way by others (although creating an alt just to disagree and act like a troll gives me a lot to think about, smh).

Anyway, the current result would be to permanently ban @Echitesu's account and @NousGalia's account for 3 months, tho it seems that they simply left the site based on the date of their last connection after being exposed.

So, if no one disagrees, I think it would be appropriate for me to apply the ban. Do you have anything to say?
I no longer remember this case. Can somebody refresh my memory please? 🙏
 
Thank you.

I think that seems reasonable. 🙏
 
Back
Top