- 1,495
- 1,147
Yes, but what I'm trying to say is that this is less of it being dishonest and more of it being a mistranslation.That's exactly what Qawsed was asking, whether the timeline was actually destroyed or not, but what was sent to him is scan that itself was misleading by implying "the entire timeline was destroyed" due to the use of 'to'. If there were scans or context to imply that entire timeline was destroyed then he should have sent that, a misleading human edited translation isn't proper evidence or a valid scan to begin with. Whether or not there's actual evidence or a scan showing the timeline being destroyed is a separate matter and should have been presented in that thread. Presenting a scan about the timeline being destroyed with a dishonest mistranslation doesn’t prove anything.