- 16,144
- 10,668
Speedster also is voting in his own threads
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
- 21,468
- 30,790
I don't know if I should've taken this to the wiki where the thread is made (planning on doing that), but in the thread that Bernkastelll linked (the Mihawk vs Zeldris one), the bias is obvious.
He restricted a character's whole arsenal because it could've helped him win a thread.
He calls people idiots consistently
Him verbatim saying "my thread, my rules" which means he can do whatever he wants.
The whole thread he's the one arguing for his character to win even though you can't do that.
And this is one thread. Apparently he's done it in others.
Irritating spite, should get banned.
Edit: He originally thought Zeldris had a blitzable speed amp and an AP advantage, but when it was revealed that Mihawk had reaction amps via Haki and higher AP, he restricted haki and equalized stats.
He restricted a character's whole arsenal because it could've helped him win a thread.
He calls people idiots consistently
Which is better, Armament Haki or Observation Haki?
Kevin Lee's answer: I’m going to say that Armament is “better” as this is shounen. Armament actually leads to you winning battles. Observation only gives you information. If you are not physical capable enough to react/use that information then its useless. Armament will “arm” you with the tools...qr.ae
Who are the most powerful Haki users of One Piece?
Isaac Gleeth's answer: I will only be using confirmed cases of Haki, so theories about Roger, while likely true, will not be used. I will also not include Haoshoku/Conqueror’s Haki in this, as not as much information has been revealed about it, unlike the other two. Kenbunshoku/Observation Haki...
Who are the most powerful Haki users of One Piece?
Amish Austin's answer: There are three types of Haki in one piece. Haki means “Will”. Every person possess two types of Haki in One piece. It can only be awaken through strenuous training. They are, 1.Busoshoku haki/ color of Arms ( Forms an invisible armor around your body ) Top users: 1.Monk...Who are the most powerful Haki users of One Piece?
Zoro Monkey ゾロモンキー's answer: Total Users of Conqueror's Haki :17 Ranking Them by Strongest to weakest : 1. Shanks 2. WhiteBeard = Roger 3. Big Mom 4. Rayleigh 5. Doffy [Born Conqueror and most willfull] 6. Kaido [unknown potenial] 7. Luffy 8. Katakuri 9. Douglas Bullet [Non Canon] 10. Chinjao 1...Mihawk is not even an honourable mention stop wanking him.
Who are the most powerful Haki users of One Piece?
Anthony Alice's answer: * Shanks * Rayleigh * Hancock * Luffy * Whitebeard * Ace * Doflamingo * Chinjao * Big Mom * Katakuri * Oden * Kid
Him verbatim saying "my thread, my rules" which means he can do whatever he wants.
The whole thread he's the one arguing for his character to win even though you can't do that.
And this is one thread. Apparently he's done it in others.
Irritating spite, should get banned.
Edit: He originally thought Zeldris had a blitzable speed amp and an AP advantage, but when it was revealed that Mihawk had reaction amps via Haki and higher AP, he restricted haki and equalized stats.
Last edited:
- 16,144
- 10,668
Indeed, he even was banned before due the exactly same thing
- 15,998
- 6,001
This is consistent, he will not allow anything for the opposing side to even gain an advantage, yet still gives NNT characters every advantage.
- 15,998
- 6,001
This is also a spite thread.
- 16,144
- 10,668
Perm, he is clearly a troll, he was banned before due the same reason but he is doing the same thing after his ban
- 21,468
- 30,790
Whatever the last time he was banned for, the punishment above that.
I.E. if he was banned for a few weeks before, make it a month
I.E. if he was banned for a few weeks before, make it a month
- 4,298
- 2,800
I would recommend a week-long ban. If this does not work, then 3 weeks.
- 15,998
- 6,001
A month. He shows absolutely no attempt at impartiality (all threads), will break the rules to ensure a character he likes wins a match at all cost (Anos vs Demon King), which before he makes a match he’s 100% sure the character he dislikes will lose (Enel vs Luck).
- 18,728
- 13,754
A week? He was being warned and still didn't care
- 16,144
- 10,668
A week is not enough, he was banned before due the same reason and still is doing the same thing, he wont stop
- 21,468
- 30,790
- 42,613
- 36,890
Sounds perfect.
- 16,144
- 10,668
Seems good
- 15,998
- 6,001
Perfect.
- 21,468
- 30,790
Looks good
FoxySonicMaster108
He/Him- 2,038
- 732
That works.
WrongIdea21
He/Him- 4,089
- 2,153
Sound wise and fair enough
- 11,134
- 14,116
Yeah, this seems fine.
- 11,251
- 19,727
Seems good... Let's hope it will be enough
- 1,507
- 624
Really don't wanna do this but I'm pretty sure there is a rule with not reporting a rule violation. @Jeune_fou on this thread changed Yubel's profile with only 1 agreement to the revision. I will be fair on Jeune though as they admit themselves that they did not know and trying to undo the changes.
- 42,613
- 36,890
It should be fine to leave alone from my standpoint then, they understand what they have done and are fixing it as we speak, no action needs to be taken!
- 1,507
- 624
Alrighty good, would feel awful if an accident like this got them banned.
- 1,026
- 146
Hello! I apparently did a major rule violation (https://www.vsbattles.com/threads/new-powers-for-yubels-list-of-powers-abilities.118690/post-3867483)
The one who noticed that will most likely post more details about it but if that could make things faster here's what happened:
I made a thread to suggest to update Yubel's profile and another member (JoshSSJgod) told me I might get banned since I updated this character's profile. I will respect your decisions (I just hope I won't get perma banned since this is my first infraction since years and years in this community).
I'll only say this: I was carried away and too hasty I can undo my changes if you allow me to. And I humbly ask you to forget my foolishness!
The one who noticed that will most likely post more details about it but if that could make things faster here's what happened:
I made a thread to suggest to update Yubel's profile and another member (JoshSSJgod) told me I might get banned since I updated this character's profile. I will respect your decisions (I just hope I won't get perma banned since this is my first infraction since years and years in this community).
I'll only say this: I was carried away and too hasty I can undo my changes if you allow me to. And I humbly ask you to forget my foolishness!
Last edited:
- 42,613
- 36,890
- 21,468
- 30,790
Blatant accident, you should be alright. You've apologized. Most likely you'd have to is revert the changes until the thread's accepted
- 167,683
- 76,264
- Thread starter
- #5,511
Would you or some other staff member be willing to handle banning him please?
No problem. It was an honest mistake. Just be more careful in the future.
- 31,372
- 34,119
I agree with giving Speedster a 3 month ban; he's also spamming a bunch of forum reports over things not report worthy despite him behaving much worse on those threads.
- 167,683
- 76,264
- Thread starter
- #5,514
Okay. Would you be willing to handle it please?
Okay. No problem.
- 31,372
- 34,119
I just took care of it.
- 167,683
- 76,264
- Thread starter
- #5,516
Here is the reply that I received:
"I presume you refer to this filter. There's nothing inherently wrong with making it publicly visible, as far as Fandom is concerned, but it can make it easier for bad faith actors to identify all of the slurs that are blocked & then use unblocked ones. It also enables good faith actors to better adhere to policy. There's pros & cons you will have to weigh & then make a decision.
My personal advice would be to have a plaintext list referring obliquely to the slurs, e.g. "no derogatory terms on the basis of race, gender, sexual orientation, et cetera"."
- 167,683
- 76,264
- Thread starter
- #5,517
Thank you.
- 39,646
- 15,557
I know the issue between Zephyr and Chariot was over and i'm bit late, but if anything i wanted to give them a session (already did with Zephyr)
EDIT: Zephyr just deleted my conversation with her, guess the stubborness on her can't be helped
EDIT: Zephyr just deleted my conversation with her, guess the stubborness on her can't be helped
Last edited:
- 24,956
- 6,271
I'm sorry, what?
Giving them a "session"?
I'm not even the target and I feel condescended against. To have the gall to extrapolate that they're just being stubborn and ignoring your lofty advice when you barge in pretending you understand the situation is confounding.
Giving them a "session"?
I'm not even the target and I feel condescended against. To have the gall to extrapolate that they're just being stubborn and ignoring your lofty advice when you barge in pretending you understand the situation is confounding.
- 42,613
- 36,890
You need ******* BALLS to barge into that.
Similar threads
