- 16,258
- 24,923
Seems fine.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Removing WOG from Ben 10
- Thread starter AmonInChains
- Start date
- 11,012
- 15,062
I agree. It looks good
- 11,875
- 5,435
I'm not familiar with the context of this thread, but I got called here. I trust the judgement of others that the reasoning is sound, but since I read the proposal anyway:
1. Repost for context:
2. In "These author's explanations", isn't it using the plural sense of "author"? If it's plural possessive, as in, the explanations of the authors, then the plural possessive, "authors'" (apostrophe following the s.), should be used, then, correct?
Apologies for any bother with the grammar nitpick, all.
1. Repost for context:
2. In "These author's explanations", isn't it using the plural sense of "author"? If it's plural possessive, as in, the explanations of the authors, then the plural possessive, "authors'" (apostrophe following the s.), should be used, then, correct?
Apologies for any bother with the grammar nitpick, all.
Last edited:
- 8,868
- 9,550
I agree with the OP.
Zanesucksatlife
Any/All- 1,137
- 1,176
I also agree
- 22,679
- 23,212
You are correct that I used the wrong spelling there.
- 15,199
- 22,446
Yeah, looks oke to me
- 287
- 44
Agree with everything. This never really made sense to me, but I could see some statements regarding niche categories stay.
- 13,823
- 19,629
Since Qaws version seems to have enough agreement I went ahead and applied the rule on verse page but Discussion rule page still needs to be unlocked.
@Dereck03 @TWILIGHT-OP
Can any of u unlock the Discussion rules page?
@Dereck03 @TWILIGHT-OP
Can any of u unlock the Discussion rules page?
- 6,544
- 6,285
Unlocked
- 13,823
- 19,629
You can lock the page back. I applied the changes.
- 13,823
- 19,629
Since the rule is different from what OP proposed and WOG is acceptable in limited capacity, i think that complete WOGs aren't supposed to be removed but to be checked if they follow our current rules and guidelines first and needs discussion before they are removed outright. So i think that discussion should take place in another thread given how its already 9 pages long. OP can do it on his own if he wishes but i am already planning to revise the profiles anyways soon. Likely in more strict manner than he might be planning to do. So i will close it, incase you plan to doscuss these WOGs in this thread itself you can ask me to reopen it on my wall but honestly its already very much conjusted so i would advise to do so in another thread.
Closing.
Closing.
- 21,509
- 36,023
Reopened at OPs request
- 808
- 779
- Thread starter
- #374
I don’t understand the rush to do this and to close the thread without asking me beforehand as the OP. We’re in a thread that, miraculously, was wrapped up in a couple of days (something that would easily take weeks on this wiki) where we already have a PROPOSAL for the abilities given by Qaw,
There are also a couple more that I have in draft form, but there aren't many more tbh. So wait, and don't close the thread without even asking me.
- 13,823
- 19,629
I mean the thread was pretty much completed after i applied the changes and since rule differed from one in the OP, i thought it will take another thread to decide what shall be removed per new rules, ateast its usually take unless the rules are quite obvious (all of the WOG), but i did mentioned it can be reopened if OP wishes to. Coming to Qawsed's suggestion, that slipped my mind but i suppose that can be removed except the Universe scan since the very thread in which Universe being infinite was accepted, was accepted because of more than just WOG, that WOG needs to be replaced from other scans used in that thread. I won't be able to give opinion on rest of the draft since i am pretty much exhausted for now so if u want to continue the thread, i suppose it can continue without me.
- 808
- 779
- Thread starter
- #376
Yeah, Discussion Rule is accepted, but we need to apply now as was planned from beginning.
The draft like I said, aren't too many more, just like 8 more things if can be checked, all from OP. Otherwise, Qaw's proposal will proceed anyway.
Anyway, I'll upload them in a little while and wait for evaluation, since I also have a concert today and I'll probably be sore tomorrow.
The draft like I said, aren't too many more, just like 8 more things if can be checked, all from OP. Otherwise, Qaw's proposal will proceed anyway.
Anyway, I'll upload them in a little while and wait for evaluation, since I also have a concert today and I'll probably be sore tomorrow.
- 808
- 779
- Thread starter
- #377
EDIT: I did this very quickly cause my last sandbox was nuked and last one was more detailed... PLEASE IMPLEMENT SECURE EXIT FROM SANDBOX EDITS
Well, Qaw's Discussion Rule is likely unanimously agreed. So he said that we could nuke the following ones:
Now, I have my own questions about this ones which doesn't appear in your list:
By other side, this user has several sus questions to Derick (it's the same user that asked for Omni-form thing which is linked in Qaw list), so I don't think we should use him at all, like G.G. case.
This one is completely broken so should be replaced or nuked (It's a McDuffie interview by its link):
And finally likely off-topic one that isn't WoG but still listed in OP because I don't think that should be in the profiles since it's from a deleted scene.
So I think this is the last thing before apply. I hope Qaw can answer this last and we can just apply. For my part, I wouldn't be able the respond until tomorrow.
Well, Qaw's Discussion Rule is likely unanimously agreed. So he said that we could nuke the following ones:
Now, I have my own questions about this ones which doesn't appear in your list:
By other side, this user has several sus questions to Derick (it's the same user that asked for Omni-form thing which is linked in Qaw list), so I don't think we should use him at all, like G.G. case.
This one is completely broken so should be replaced or nuked (It's a McDuffie interview by its link):
And finally likely off-topic one that isn't WoG but still listed in OP because I don't think that should be in the profiles since it's from a deleted scene.
So I think this is the last thing before apply. I hope Qaw can answer this last and we can just apply. For my part, I wouldn't be able the respond until tomorrow.
- 3,237
- 1,780
This was being fixing in another CRT before this CRT, but i didn't add now additions. I use another statements/scans (in show and comics)
- 22,679
- 23,212
- Spoiler 1: This is not a leading question. The user asked "Why didn't Alien V use any powers other than growing bigger" and the author answered "We planned on Alien V to take over the universe". The author added there own input to the question without being asked.
- Spoiler 2: I did mention it. I said it was unusable and the writer admitted to not remembering the episode and was just agreeing with the question asker.
- Spoiler 3: The Aquatic aspect can be considered leading I guess
- Spoiler 4: The user asked Duncan if the alien could control water, which Duncan responded with a far more complex answer that still didn't answer what tbe user was asking. The author giving a detailed or strange answer is not a leading question, the question itself has to propose or suggest something for it to be considered as such. If Duncan said "Yes it can control water" I'd be more inclined to remove it.
- Spoiler 5: I already talked about this one. Dwyane said that the magic rock monsters had no DNA and the Omnitrix struggles with magic, but it's been misinterpreted as being that all magical creatures have no DNA when that wasn't suggested by his statement.
- Spoilers: Deleted scenes are usable as supporting tertiary canon for stuff if they're not contradicted or semi-acknowledged in some way.
- 3,237
- 1,780
Zanesucksatlife
Any/All- 1,137
- 1,176
Link is broken
GeneralSol16
He/Him- 1,730
- 779
Which isn't true so it should not be used
- 808
- 779
- Thread starter
- #384
It's fine. Thanks for your response.
I will list all the abilities mentioned in a few minutes, and then start removing their in the same way as stated in OP.
- 3,929
- 2,042
i think this is the same for this question as well the question was based on a what if two Ben transforms into Alien X at the same time, the part about him existing outside of space-time is an extra info that wasn't even asked at the beginning
Ben 10 Wiki
Ben 10 Planet is the ultimate Ben 10 resource where anyone can edit and learn about the vast universe of Ben 10!
ben10.fandom.com
- 808
- 779
- Thread starter
- #386
Would fall in the same way as Omnitrix response.i think this is the same for this question as well the question was based on a what if two Ben transforms into Alien X at the same time, the part about him existing outside of space-time is an extra info that wasn't even asked at the beginning
Ben 10 Wiki
Ben 10 Planet is the ultimate Ben 10 resource where anyone can edit and learn about the vast universe of Ben 10!
- 3,929
- 2,042
huh? this isn't even a question or powerscaling based thing
- 22,679
- 23,212
The main issue I have with this is that the question asker is a power scaler and is asking it for that basis.
Having said thar, the question asker being a power scaler isn't enough to dismiss it, but it would be regarded as a possibly rating rather than a solid one in my mind.
- 3,237
- 1,780
Reiner has been dealing with this, so you don't need to do it.
- 3,929
- 2,042
i don't know if the user who asked this is a power scaler but if we are asumming he is a power scaler only based on "omnipotence/can do anything" it shouldn't be counted for powerscaling because those things are implied in the show for Alien X but if the user asked questions that based on power scaling before/after this post then possibly rating is fine.
Last edited:
- 13,823
- 19,629
I think i saw aomethingg important about that user and this question in specific whicch might br relevant here, its been long so my memory is foggy but i will see if i czn find it again rq.
- 808
- 779
- Thread starter
- #392
If you mean the new thread, now that we have the abilities confirmation for removal, I wouldn't mind transfer this ONLY if it's noted the statements that are completely discarded from here. Like, I saw someone that wants keep an ability which was listed here:
Since it would be like three parts, I can't guarantee that what's here will be respected in the next two, so that's I'm proposing this for the OP.
Last edited:
- 13,823
- 19,629
Actually nvm. That user twitter account is suspended and i can't find that stuff i saw long ago. It was basically Duncan agreeing to answer 5 any of his question so it was kind of twitter interview questions. He didn't appear to be a powerscaler to me but since Alien X questions are asked to even MOA central about if Ax can survive this that etc, its not a surprise he picked him.
This is all i have where Duncan can be seen to answer 5 of his questions.
This is all i have where Duncan can be seen to answer 5 of his questions.
- 808
- 779
- Thread starter
- #394
He's in fact a powerscaler.Actually nvm. That user twitter account is suspended and i can't find that stuff i saw long ago. It was basically Duncan agreeing to answer 5 any of his question so it was kind of twitter interview questions. He didn't appear to be a powerscaler to me but since Alien X questions are asked to even MOA central about if Ax can survive this that etc, its not a surprise he picked him.
This is all i have where Duncan can be seen to answer 5 of his questions.
This is his account from Comic Vines, another powerscaling site, and yeah he was very active in this.
Last edited:
- 13,823
- 19,629
I see, well nvm then.
Aside from this one. What about the WOGs your 50/50 on?
- 11,012
- 15,062
Ben 10 Twitter Users don't ask the creators a powerscaling question challenge (IMPOSSIBLE)
- 3,929
- 2,042
- 1,226
- 766
- 808
- 779
- Thread starter
- #400
As pointed by Qaw, most of the abilities should be nuked or at most works as a "Possibly".What are the conclusions here so far?
I was told to not remove the abilities since @Reiner04 is making threads to replace it, however, I just want to ensure that the abilities previously listed going to be respected in his decision of Possibly/Removal.
