- 18,393
- 14,323
If regeneration is involved, this is simply limited low godly regeneration
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Regarding regeneration
- Thread starter Theglassman12
- Start date
-
- Tags
- regeneration resurrection
- Status
- 32,835
- 38,111
I mean, regeneration of soul is definitely involved, as it was completely destroyed in this case but then the power brings back the soul in one full piece. But the physical body itself remains more or less untouched.
Would it still be Limited Low-Godly despite the fact that only the soul was destroyed and regenerated but the body remained intact?
- 18,393
- 14,323
Limited comes from the fact that the body remained intact, so ya this should be fine.
Also regeneration are generally some form of resurrection
Also regeneration are generally some form of resurrection
- 20,105
- 10,899
- Thread starter
- #44
Not exactly because resurrection implies you died and came back to life, where type 3 is just you keep regenerating from any wounds to stay alive
- 18,393
- 14,323
Should have rephrased better, regeneration at this godly level is indirectly “self-resurrection”. Resurrection and Regeneration are both subjected to the same standards on VSBW, so it doesn't change much at that point. Even a person that gets cut into pieces is technically “dead”. That is purely perspective based.
So in conclusion, regeneration in this level could be like “resurrection” but “resurrection” is nowhere the aforementioned as regeneration.
- 20,105
- 10,899
- Thread starter
- #47
I guess that should be enough. We should probably add a note for the regeneration page regarding these specific types of feats
- 168,522
- 77,260
Does somebody among our staff or experienced and knowledgeable members have a draft suggestion for such a note text.
- 20,105
- 10,899
- Thread starter
- #49
Note: Any and all statements/feats where the characters can either live so long as a part of their existence remains such as the soul or mind, or where they regenerated a non physical aspect of their body but the body itself remains intact will not count towards Godly levels of regen, as they will not only count as resurrection but they lack one of the requirements for this level of regeneration, which is that their entire body has to be gone and reformed alongside any non physical aspects that was destroyed.
Does this look good?
Does this look good?
- 18,393
- 14,323
I assume, this is better version
- 168,522
- 77,260
How about something like this?
"Statements or feats of regeneration in which characters are able to survive as long as a part of their existence, such as their souls or minds, remain intact, or that involve the regeneration of a non-physical aspect of the body while the body itself remains intact, do not warrant godly levels of regeneration due to involving resurrection rather than the complete destruction and reforming of both the physical and non-physical aspects of a body, which is a fundamental requirement to qualify."
"Statements or feats of regeneration in which characters are able to survive as long as a part of their existence, such as their souls or minds, remain intact, or that involve the regeneration of a non-physical aspect of the body while the body itself remains intact, do not warrant godly levels of regeneration due to involving resurrection rather than the complete destruction and reforming of both the physical and non-physical aspects of a body, which is a fundamental requirement to qualify."
Last edited:
- 18,393
- 14,323
I assume talking as 3rd form is better and shows professional and formal language in my opinion.
Edit: "We" is not much defined, so I assume replacing it with other sentence or "VSBW" is better
Edit: "We" is not much defined, so I assume replacing it with other sentence or "VSBW" is better
- 20,105
- 10,899
- Thread starter
- #54
@Antvasima that looks fine.
- 168,522
- 77,260
@KLOL506 @Pain_to12 @Psychomaster35 @Antoniofer @Sir_Ovens @DarkDragonMedeus @Elizhaa
What do you think about this?
- 31,639
- 34,670
Looks good to me.
PrinceofPein
Username Only- 9,100
- 6,037
this looks fine but you can probably add a wording to make the differentiation between regen and immo.
for the immortality part, they need to die or be considered dead in their work/verse, while regen they are still considered to be alive
- 18,393
- 14,323
Dead is, in fact, subjectively subjective. I already addressed it. Mind explaining what do you mean by “dead” since someone a person that gets cut into pieces is technically “dead”. That is purely perspective based.
PrinceofPein
Username Only- 9,100
- 6,037
if the work considers them dead, then they are dead.
I already clarified that
- 16,007
- 8,258
It's fine with me.
- 16,176
- 9,418
I'm good with this.
- 9,978
- 2,016
Sounds good enough.
- 32,835
- 38,111
Type 8 is Dependant Immortality. This'd be Type 4 normally speaking, but if it's a reliant immortality, then it'd usually be Type 4 and 8 in combination.
- 18,393
- 14,323
.... Type 8 is reliant immortality, KloL...
- 32,835
- 38,111
Yes... that's what I said, that regeneration of soul post-death and return to life is Type 4 Immortality. Type 8 would be added in if this is due to an external factor making such a resurrection possible.
- 168,522
- 77,260
So which of these wordings should we use then?
- 18,393
- 14,323
She (pain_12) did not explain what is “dead” meant in the context. So it is preferably needed to be added to clear confusion.
PrinceofPein
Username Only- 9,100
- 6,037
Dead in the context of the work, as I already explained.
If you have your head loped off and you can still talk inside your own verse, then you are not dead. but in your verse your head got loped off and you were refer to as dead, then you are dead, already said this
So that way you can differentiate between regen and immo
Regen requires you to be alive, while immo requires you to be dead
- 18,393
- 14,323
Alright, seems fine, then.
- 168,522
- 77,260
So about this...
- 956
- 1,117
I think Regen needs to be reworked, to remove the weird tiering stuff and just list what the character has been showed to/should be able to heal from
Arkenis
They/Them- 17,248
- 7,973
what would be removed? Like the mid, low-mid, that?
- 18,393
- 14,323
I don't know what he is talking about but I disagree.
- 32,835
- 38,111
I don't see the point. Our regen levels work perfectly fine to demonstrate fine lines between the levels of regeneration. Also this is derailing and not at all relevant to the topic at hand.
- 12,254
- 6,205
about what you quote, it seems to be Zamasu returning only with his will
If a character doesn't have a soul is he able to die a natural death?
- 168,522
- 77,260
- 31,639
- 34,670
About to go to sleep, but will say that proposal looks alright.
- Status
