- 5,618
- 392
-The lack of intelligent arguments
-Then proceed to make unintelligent arguments
Great!
-Then proceed to make unintelligent arguments
Great!
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Regarding Dragon Ball and dimensional tiering...
- Thread starter Sparky_"Dante"_Marky1234
- Start date
-
- Tags
- tiering system
- Status
- 387
- 16
- Thread starter
- #42
It discuss the same possibility, also what do you mean by isn't relevant to dimensional tiering? the dimensional tiering si not for discussion.
I am not going for a change in the system, I am saying it shouldn't apply to Dragon Ball as it's proven otherwise.
I am not going for a change in the system, I am saying it shouldn't apply to Dragon Ball as it's proven otherwise.
- 5,618
- 392
I mean i remember we don't create the GetBackers profile because of the dimensional tiering kinda not applied to them due to entirely relied on hax and wank.Sparky "Dante" Marky1234 said:
- 3
- 1
Not Jim Sterling said:
I haven't even made an argument in regards to this post, other than my reply to Jonathanlighter. Are you serious? Why are you even referring to me at all, anyway?
- 387
- 16
- Thread starter
- #45
That goes to show that it isn't just Dragon Ball, but other verses that do not use dimensional tiering.
It seems to be too heavily relied on, even when verses are shown to not use it, and when they are not, like you are saying, they are simply no longer on the wiki.
Keeping this logic for Dragon Ball makes them limited by something that doesn't apply to them.
It seems to be too heavily relied on, even when verses are shown to not use it, and when they are not, like you are saying, they are simply no longer on the wiki.
Keeping this logic for Dragon Ball makes them limited by something that doesn't apply to them.
- 5,618
- 392
Ahh apparently you are wrong.The real cal howard said:
- 40,473
- 12,955
- shrugs.
And no. I don't think I'm above this situation
- 5,618
- 392
The real cal howard said:*shrugs.
I'm just gonna sit in the corner and sip my tea. Just wanted to make sure things didn't get out of hand.
And no. I don't think I'm above this situation
Oh well can I join you?
- 387
- 16
- Thread starter
- #49
Ahh apparently you are wrong.
Not trying to be offensive, but I don't see a point in continuing this with you, unless you stay on topic and not make random claims against me.
Dimensional Tiering not applying to a verse is not changing the Dimensional Tiering system itself.
Not trying to be offensive, but I don't see a point in continuing this with you, unless you stay on topic and not make random claims against me.
Dimensional Tiering not applying to a verse is not changing the Dimensional Tiering system itself.
- 5,618
- 392
Dimensional Tiering not applying to a verse is not changing the Dimensional Tiering system itself.
meanwhile every profile on here use dimensional Tiering xD but you are right there are no point to continuing this with you.
meanwhile every profile on here use dimensional Tiering xD but you are right there are no point to continuing this with you.
- 168,854
- 77,825
We do not strictly use a dimensional tiering system. We use a system of increasing orders of infinity, which includes differences between fictional levels. See our Composite Hierarchies page for an example.
Dragon Ball has strictly demonstrated a multi-universal scale as of yet, and as such cannot be rated higher for the moment.
However, The living tribunal1 is planning to make a bit of a revision to the difference between tiers 3-A and Low 2-C that may bring upgrades to Dragon Ball, if the changes are accepted by the staff.
Regardless, being present in a void beyond regular 4-D spacetime is a common plot convenience within fiction, and does not warrant a higher rating by itself, according to my past discussions with DarkLK regarding the subject.
For such higher tiers to be accepted, it must be clearly established that a character itself is of a higher-dimensional or beyond-dimensional level, and that it does not completely contradict everything else that we know about them.
Also, it is very strongly against our regulations to create threads that attack our tiering system, and it is not practically feasible to start to make exceptions for some franchises, with no available alternatives.
In a worst case completely unquantifiable scenario, we simply have to not allow the fiction to be featured at all, as was the case for Getbackers.
Hence, all that you are arguing for is that we should delete all of the Dragon Ball profiles, which is not a good solution for anyone involved.
Dragon Ball has strictly demonstrated a multi-universal scale as of yet, and as such cannot be rated higher for the moment.
However, The living tribunal1 is planning to make a bit of a revision to the difference between tiers 3-A and Low 2-C that may bring upgrades to Dragon Ball, if the changes are accepted by the staff.
Regardless, being present in a void beyond regular 4-D spacetime is a common plot convenience within fiction, and does not warrant a higher rating by itself, according to my past discussions with DarkLK regarding the subject.
For such higher tiers to be accepted, it must be clearly established that a character itself is of a higher-dimensional or beyond-dimensional level, and that it does not completely contradict everything else that we know about them.
Also, it is very strongly against our regulations to create threads that attack our tiering system, and it is not practically feasible to start to make exceptions for some franchises, with no available alternatives.
In a worst case completely unquantifiable scenario, we simply have to not allow the fiction to be featured at all, as was the case for Getbackers.
Hence, all that you are arguing for is that we should delete all of the Dragon Ball profiles, which is not a good solution for anyone involved.
- 168,854
- 77,825
Anyway, I will close this thread again. However, everybody involved should consider this as a strong warning to not bring up such topics again, or we will be forced to block you to protect the integrity of our wiki. Thank you.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
