- 33,408
- 8,430
- Thread starter
- #41
YHVH is more of a Demiurge/Humanities corruption of him, etc, but I digress...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Of course. Offense shouldn't govern what is and isn't allowed on the Wiki.Rocker1189 said:I find it offensive to call God the ultimate evil, but I am not going to get mad at the wiki for having him as a character since it is from another verse.
It is. And it's bad and I take offense to it. Do I want it banned? No.Antvasima said:Preacher is considerably worse in that regard than SMT i.m.h.o.
My problem is not the offense in it self. Like I said I was not offended with that discussion above in anyway.Assaltwaffle said:Of course. Offense shouldn't govern what is and isn't allowed on the Wiki.
But if y'all want to ban all such discussion, go ahead. You're just following FANDOM's path of PC outrage culture-quelling censorship.
I'm not even supporting this because of how grossly this offends people, which makes me support this more, sure, but not really my main reason.Assaltwaffle said:Of course. Offense shouldn't govern what is and isn't allowed on the Wiki.
But if y'all want to ban all such discussion, go ahead. You're just following FANDOM's path of PC outrage culture-quelling censorship.
One of the first things I said in the OP.Dragonmasterxyz said:I feel like we need to talk about this. To simply put, discussions regarding tiering prominent/active religious figures should flat out not be allowed. I am not talking about variations who appear in various works of fictio, but instead the actual texts the religious people actually study and follow.
This is my point. Imagine Naruto vs Bleach threads x10.Yobobojojo said:Look, if you don't think this is necessary, look how badly even normal versus threads can go. It's irrational yes, but it's also human.
Too damn true.Dargoo Faust said:Y'all have way too much faith in religious discussions not getting heated.
Look at the last several thousand years, including the present day, then come back and tell me it won't be a shitshow here.
100%Yobobojojo said:We literally have 44 threads of Rule Violation Threads that spawned from just fictional Verses with no real world religious references being toxic. If we want to bring religion into that, we must be absolutely insane.
As you probably know, I personally despise the aforementioned type of massive restrictions in the freedom of speech for fact-based rational discourse about important topics that need to be handled for civilisation to function properly, but there is a time and place for it, and a harmless entertainment wiki that collects people from the entire world that might quickly start to constantly scream at each other if they went into ideology, probably isn't it.Assaltwaffle said:But if y'all want to ban all such discussion, go ahead. You're just following FANDOM's path of PC outrage culture-quelling censorship.