• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Questions about qualitative superiority and R>F

Status
Not open for further replies.
Georredannea15 said:
Pein and DT didn't talk about what we discussed in the revision, and frankly I think she's wrong. As I said, I don't care what Pein or anybody else says, because it wasn't discussed in the revision. At the very beginning pein opened the revision for R>F to give HDE and DT refused.
Click to expand...
Pain has wrote the revision. So Idc, her words are there on HDE page which states that uncountable infinite "construct" doesn't give HDE but just existential QS, change the standards if you disagree with what she has wrote.
Georredannea15 said:
Quote me DT's comment or a comment from the HDE page about what we are discussing. Other than that... mehh
Click to expand...
> Being infinitely larger than or containing infinite 3-dimensional objects, entities, or constructs signifies an uncountable infinite difference, which can suggest qualitative superiority. However, without further context, this does not necessarily imply the existence of an extradimensional axis.
 
Reiner said:
Pain has wrote the revision. So Idc, her words are there on HDE page which states that uncountable infinite "construct" doesn't give HDE but just existential QS, change the standards if you disagree with what she has wrote.
Click to expand...
Page is not talking about "existential QS", which you quoted below. It is only talking about the uncountable infinite difference=QS
Reiner said:
> Being infinitely larger than or containing infinite 3-dimensional objects, entities, or constructs signifies an uncountable infinite difference, which can suggest qualitative superiority. However, without further context, this does not necessarily imply the existence of an extradimensional axis.
Click to expand...
Then the HDE of the character containing a 4-D universal space-time must go.

nuke all large size based HDEs in the wiki lmao.
 
Georredannea15 said:
Then the HDE of the character containing a 4-D universal space-time must go.

nuke all large size based HDEs in the wiki lmao.
Click to expand...
im very sure a 3D space cannot contain a 4D space
that is common logic
There is a thing called assumption when such cases are present unless the fiction specifically says otherwise despite the fact that it is illogical

Also, the quote is specifically talking about containing infinite 3D space and not an entire spacetime continuum. which is why we cannot assume it contains a 4th axis because infinite 3D space is only 3D space unless specified it also contains time.
so QS to 3D things by uncountable infinite of course doesn't grant HDE in 4D as it specifically did not mention time as included and only infinite 3 dimensional object
 
I think he is just overwhelmed especially with how a lot of us trying to explain it at the same time.

But give it some time and try not to hyper fixate so much on things and read more into the clarifications on later responses.
 
ImmortalDread said:
Georr: "Hey let's call Pain, she is actually knowledgeable member"
"Pain spitted fax"
Georr: "I think she is wrong"

This is the moment you lose your argument terribly.
Click to expand...
I never said that, lmao. I asked for DT's interpretation for that but I guess you don't want understand that.
 
TheGreatJedi13 said:
im very sure a 3D space cannot contain a 4D space
that is common logic
There is a thing called assumption when such cases are present unless the fiction specifically says otherwise despite the fact that it is illogical

Also, the quote is specifically talking about containing infinite 3D space and not an entire spacetime continuum. which is why we cannot assume it contains a 4th axis because infinite 3D space is only 3D space unless specified it also contains time.
so QS to 3D things by uncountable infinite of course doesn't grant HDE in 4D as it specifically did not mention time as included and only infinite 3 dimensional object
Click to expand...
I never claimed that.

A universal space-time continuum = having uncountably infinitely larger size than any 3-D structure.

And if we think about it for a character, that is, a character with an uncountably infinitely larger size than 3-D, this will give it an extra +1 range of movement, so it will be 4-D with large size because uncountable infinite always means "+1" and in this case it gives you +1 range of movement.

What DT is talking about is to encompass 3-D structures and be infinite(Well, i guess), but I am not talking about these, I am talking about being uncountable infinitely/qualitatively larger than these 3-D structures in terms of "size".

Likewise, there may be an uncountable infinite difference between you and 3-D(power), but this only gives you Tier.
 
Last edited:
ImmortalDread said:
It's fine observation for me. If DT came and told you are wrong, you will still think DT is wrong.


@Reiner and @TheGreatJedi13 what are y'all actually benefit on this?
Click to expand...
Don't confuse me with you, you're the one who did this. Whether DT or Ultima, Lmao. Anyway...

I don't actually do that. If DT says it, I'll say "he knows something" and I'll move on.

Of course, I'll open a thread and try to correct it, but if DT insists on it and explains it with evidence, I'll say I'm mistaken and move on.

Just like Pein called R>F is a HDE and later realised she was wrong, we are not children, we can understand this
 
DontTalkDT said:
What's the question?
Click to expand...
It's about current revision that happened in HDE page. Specifically this one:

Being infinitely larger than or containing infinite 3-dimensional objects, entities, or constructs signifies an uncountable infinite difference, which can suggest qualitative superiority. However, without further context, this does not necessarily imply the existence of an extradimensional axis.

Arguements are that it's talking about uncountable infinite difference of AP not size. So uncountable infinite size still Qualifies as HDE by default regardless of the revision and pain said no, current addition do not give uncountable infinite size HDE by default but doubt are still there.
ImmortalDread said:
OP
Click to expand...
Reiner said:
DT will come to me one day I'm sure
Click to expand...
Told ya.
 
DontTalkDT said:
The answer is case-by-case. What's the question?
The stuff in the OP or has the discussion moved on?
Click to expand...
There are 3 questions;

1- Does having an uncountable infinitely larger "size" or "existence" according to 3D structures give HDE?

2- Does a person who performs R>F have an uncountably infinitely greater existence/size than the reality he/she sees as fiction?

3- Is R>F basically an existential qualitative transcendence, or is it just being "more real than the lower plane"?
 
Last edited:
LuisGeno said:
I have great doubts about the qualitative superiority and the R>F, if someone answers me I would greatly appreciate it.

First: qualitative superiority could be achieved by being "infinitely larger" than x dimension, and therefore that dimension is infinitesimal to that infinitely larger dimension. Alright?
Click to expand...
Sounds ok. As long as it's the right level of infinitely larger.
LuisGeno said:
And another thing, if the higher spatial dimensions are not automatically greater infinities than each other, where did the idea that extradimensional axes could give rise to greater infinities come from? Where can I read information about this? I want to learn it well.
Click to expand...
vsbattles.fandom.com

Some old stuff

vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com

î--- an old explanation page from before the tiering revision.
LuisGeno said:
Another thing, does the transcendence R>F between layers/dimensions make them infinitely greater than each other? According to me, this has nothing to do with size, but with the nature of dimensions/layers, so is it a form of qualitative transcendence, or is it just a form that is added apart?
Click to expand...
It's not physically greater unless the verse describes it as such. It's a power difference large enough to correspond to qualitative superiority, though.
LuisGeno said:
And, last question: if in a verse it is mentioned that there are infinite dimensions, that they are explicitly about extra dimensional axes, but nevertheless, there is only evidence of qualitative superiority between 3 of those infinite dimensions, can this qualitative superiority also be applied to all other dimensions?
Click to expand...
Case-by-case.
LuisGeno said:
I had heard that this is possible, if it is said that the qualitative superiority is by its nature of spatial dimension, but I want to be sure.
Click to expand...
If it's said that it's a property of dimensions in general, then yes.
Reiner said:
It's about current revision that happened in HDE page. Specifically this one:

Being infinitely larger than or containing infinite 3-dimensional objects, entities, or constructs signifies an uncountable infinite difference, which can suggest qualitative superiority. However, without further context, this does not necessarily imply the existence of an extradimensional axis.

Arguements are that it's talking about uncountable infinite difference of AP not size. So uncountable infinite size still Qualifies as HDE by default regardless of the revision and pain said no, current addition do not give uncountable infinite size HDE by default but doubt are still there.
Click to expand...
One can imagine cases in fiction in which a character is larger in a fashion that qualitative superiority is achieved without having HDE.
Georredannea15 said:
There are 3 questions;

1- Does having an uncountable infinitely larger "size" or "existence" according to 3D structures give HDE?
Click to expand...
Not necessarily.
Georredannea15 said:
2- Does a person who performs R>F have an uncountably infinitely greater existence/size than the reality he/she sees as fiction?
Click to expand...
That question is kinda vague. Greater existence in which sense? If we talk size, then no, unless it's specified (Umineko for instance specifies it)
Georredannea15 said:
3- Is R>F basically an existential qualitative transcendence, or is it just being "more real than the lower plane"?
Click to expand...
I don't see the difference.
 
DontTalkDT said:
Not necessarily.
Click to expand...
Wouldn't that have won you Large size? For example, Large size type 9 is to have a "size" as big as multiple space-time continuums, and which gives you HDE by default.

And wouldn't having a "size" uncountably infinitely larger than the 3D structures give you HDE directly with large size I mentioned above? Or am I missing something?
DontTalkDT said:
That question is kinda vague. Greater existence in which sense? If we talk size, then no, unless it's specified (Umineko for instance specifies it)
Click to expand...
Well, i mean pyhsical size.(Large size)
DontTalkDT said:
I don't see the difference.
Click to expand...
So one last question, does R>F give a character an "uncountable infinitely larger existence/size" by default(I mean pyhsical size)? Or does this need to be stated in the verse.
 
Last edited:
Anyway, my goal was to prove that R>F does not give without context "uncountably infinitely larger/greater size/existence", but I came up with a lot more bullshit, I'm still waiting for him answers.(I hope he sees)
 
Last edited:
Georredannea15 said:
Wouldn't that have won you Large size? For example, Large size type 9 is to have a "size" as big as multiple space-time continuums, and which gives you HDE by default.

And wouldn't having a "size" uncountably infinitely larger than the 3D structures give you HDE directly with large size I mentioned above? Or am I missing something?
Click to expand...
Being infinitely large would give you large size.

But being higher D has something to do with how many directions your body extends into. So no. You can be large in other ways.
Georredannea15 said:
So one last question, does R>F give a character an "uncountable infinitely larger existence/size" by default(I mean pyhsical size)? Or does this need to be stated in the verse.
Click to expand...
No, just qualitative superiority, unless there are other statements or showings.
 
Well, my questions have already been answered, I think that unless other people have doubts about the same thing, they can close the thread. Thank you very much DT, and others for answering my questions.
 
DontTalkDT said:
Being infinitely large would give you large size.

But being higher D has something to do with how many directions your body extends into. So no. You can be large in other ways.
Click to expand...
I see. For example having a Type 9 large size does not always give HDE by default. Thanks DT🙏
DontTalkDT said:
No, just qualitative superiority, unless there are other statements or showings.
Click to expand...
Thanks DT. Actually, the first discussion area of the thread was whether R>F has uncountable infinitely larger/greater size than the lower plane or not. Thanks for the clarification. 🙏
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

NousGalia
Question about Qualitative superiority?
Replies
31
Views
1K
Astral_Trinity439
Astral_Trinity439
Requiem_Yoriichi
Reality-Fiction Transcendence: Why is it qualitative superiority?
Replies
10
Views
2K
Astral_Trinity439
Astral_Trinity439
Elyartaker
qualitative superiority & reality-fiction
Replies
4
Views
1K
Elyartaker
Elyartaker
Grabbing_dragon
qualitative superiority new tier system
Replies
2
Views
1K
VeryGoofyToddler2
VeryGoofyToddler2
Vyfourthaccount
tier 1 question
Replies
12
Views
844
Vyfourthaccount
Vyfourthaccount
Back
Top