Question about Nep2

[Panpanpanjeidj]

I've heard that in this wiki we don't use omnipotent because it can't be proven.

"this would be something that is neither 1 nor 0, where 1 is existence and 0 is nonexistence."

What principle does existing but not exist prove to be?

 

[Lapsad]

Unlike omnipotence , NEP is still having a specific feat to prove , but omnipotence it would be somthing beyond our logical standard

 

[Panpanpanjeidj]

Unlike omnipotence , NEP is still having a specific feat to prove , but omnipotence it would be somthing beyond our logical standard

Isn't it contradictory to exist but not exist?

 

[Lapsad]

No, it's not , NEP type 2 mean your aren't exist on any principle ( comparison in binary 0 and 1 is a kind of principle) , it's not somthing that i'm exist and also i'm not exist , type 2 is not exist in such comparison

 

[Panpanpanjeidj]

No, it's not , NEP type 2 mean your aren't exist on any principle ( comparison in binary 0 and 1 is a kind of principle) , it's not somthing that i'm exist and also i'm not exist , type 2 is not exist in such comparison

Thank you so much

 

[Panpanpanjeidj]

Then, if you don't mind, could you tell me what principles make Nep1 exist?

 

[Lapsad]

Type 1 is meaning your aren't exist in physical reality , conventional physics such matter , energy , four fundamental force , and metaphysics (soul) your existence are avoided all of them

 

[Panpanpanjeidj]

Type 1 is meaning your aren't exist in physical reality , conventional physics such matter , energy , four fundamental force , and metaphysics (soul) your existence are avoided all of them

Oh really thank you.