• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

NEP2 Questions

Messages
291
Reaction score
65
1. Is a character that is beyond the "concept of existence and the concept of nonexistence" NEP2? (even though we have no statement that the character does not exist)?
2. NEP 2 then are we "forced" to prove that character doesn't exist if we upgrade NEP2 with binary 0 and 1?
3. If character A is NEP 2 and lacks all aspects (except information type 2), can character B use IM2 to attack character A even though B has no NEP2 interaction feat?
 
1. No, just nonduality type 1, character need to be nonexistent first
3. Yes, because A still have information type 2 aspect existing, mean B can use IM2 to target that existing aspect
 
3. Yes, because A still have information type 2 aspect existing, mean B can use IM2 to target that existing aspect
So if B can destroy character C (character C lacks conceptual aspects) by conceptual manipulation, can B destroy A by conceptual manipulation even without NEP2 interaction?
 
So if B can destroy character C (character C lacks conceptual aspects) by conceptual manipulation, can B destroy A by conceptual manipulation even without NEP2 interaction?
Hmm, yeah, since B can destroy use CM on characters who lack concept and destroy them
 
Back
Top