Question about low 1-A?

[Seraphor12]

If something can contain the type 1 concept of space, time, and everything in the existence so would it be low 1A?

 

[Grabbing_dragon]

If the concept is not the very essence/whatness, then it would not be Low 1-A.

 

[Vietthai96]

If the concept is not the very essence/whatness, then it would not be Low 1-A.

Tbf here, concept is already an essence of something, concept of space-time will define and encompass all physical extension of space-time, make it Low 1-A

 

[Shar122]

If something can contain the type 1 concept of space, time, and everything in the existence so would it be low 1A?

It would be Low 1-A, since it literally engulfs the (what-is-to-be to be the "space-time" itself) in every sense of that defining notion.

 

[Grabbing_dragon]

Tbf here, concept is already an essence of something, concept of space-time will define and encompass all physical extension of space-time, make it Low 1-A

The word concept does not equal without being defined since it has lots of meaning making it vague, and just being called concept of spacetime will just make it an abstract force that has an effect on reality, not something that defines what spacetime is. For concept to be equal to essence, it needs to be called concept of spacetime-"ness". In that context it will be the very essence; with more context it will be low 1A as Ultima said here. And I agree with Ultima, I hate this name. It is messed up due to the ability being named concept when it should be essence or quality manipulation, etc.

 

[Vietthai96]

The word concept does not equal without being defined since it has lots of meaning making it vague, and just being called concept of spacetime will just make it an abstract force that has an effect on reality, not something that defines what spacetime is. For concept to be equal to essence, it needs to be called concept of spacetime-"ness". In that context it will be the very essence; with more context it will be low 1A as Ultima said here. And I agree with Ultima, I hate this name. It is messed up due to the ability being named concept when it should be essence or quality manipulation, etc.

This is just him talking about how CM standard being mess up, which of course yes, not really mean anything here, because we are talking if the concept of space-time can be Low 1-A or not, not about is it a legit concept or not. Which of course, concept of space-time define physical dimensions of space and time, it encompass all possible physical extension of space-time thus is Low 1-A

 

[Grabbing_dragon]

This is just him talking about how CM standard being mess up, which of course yes, not really mean anything here, because we are talking if the concept of space-time can be Low 1-A or not, not about is it a legit concept or not. Which of course, concept of space-time define physical dimensions of space and time, it encompass all possible physical extension of space-time thus is Low 1-A

The OP’s question depended on the concept of spacetime for it is low 1A since the concept is not the essence; therefore, it does not encompass all possible dimensions without a statement and what Ultima was also talking about was what qualifies as low 1A and 1A type 1 concept of spacetime. The second part of the question was that it is containing everything in existence, but that too, by itself, does not mean much for scaling

 

[Seraphor12]

idk but ultima also said that being above any type of concept of dimensions would be low 1-A, so idk if it would matter here?

 

[Grabbing_dragon]

idk but ultima also said that being above any type of concept of dimensions would be low 1-A, so idk if it would matter here?

It needs to be a direct statement, in that context, that a character transcends the concept of dimensions.