- 4,974
- 2,887
General
Hey peeps. So... I'm beginning to see issues with what is considered "Extended Melee Range." As it currently stands, Extended Range is listed as this.:
Extended melee range (ranges from 3 to 10 meters)
This seems QUITE iffy. Why? I'll show ya.:
Weapon Lengths
Now, the main issue involves the melee weapon parts. In "Standard Range," weapon examples are listed as "Knives/daggers, gauntlets, and short-ranged weapons." There, it isn't specified as to what is meant by "short-ranged weapons." I measured a few things around my house that could be weaponized and got this.:
Scalpel: 3.7 cm (blade length)
Steak Knife: 11.7 cm (blade length)
Chef's Knife: 20 cm (blade length) with 12-cm hilt.
Baseball Bat: 82.5 cm (excluding the knob)
Considering an arm has to grasp a weapon to in order to even use it, I measured my own arm with my hand in a grasping position and got 63.5 cm. Let's assume 65 cm for the length of a grasping arm. With the weapons in question, I can get values like these.
Arm w/ Scalpel: ~70 cm
Arm w/ Steak Knife: ~77.5 cm
Arm w/ Chef's Knife: ~86 cm
Arms w/ Baseball Bat: ~130 cm (1.3 m; both hands on hilt)
Note that leeways had to be given here because nobody would be stupid enough to straight-up grab the blade like a hilt. Why? Well, here's what was listed as examples for Extended Melee Range.:
"Sword/sabers, polearms/spears, and explosives such as a thrown grenade would qualify for this range as well."
One can safely consider a baseball bat to be a sword-length weapon. Note that the part of the weapon that DOES the damage is the blade of the weapon. However, it might be just as important to list the total length of a sword. Here's what I got.:
Bronze Age Sword (Naue II): 60-70 cm (total length)
Gladius: 60-85 cm (45-68 cm blade length)
Rapier: 104 cm (average blade length)
Falchion: 95.25 cm (80 cm blade length)
Longsword: 100-130 cm (90-110 cm blade length)
Claymore: 120-140 cm (100-120 cm blade length)
Zweihander: At least 140 cm (total length); grip needs to be a minimum of 25 cm long. Longest specimen known is 213 cm long.
Katana: 60-73 cm (blade length)
Not even the longest sword, a Zweihander reportedly owned by Pier Gerlofs Donia, can match the current definition of "Extended Melee Range."
Now, stuff like spears, polearms, and staffs are left out of this because they are either throwing weapons if they're light enough, jabbing weapons if necessary, or plowing weapons (ex. the lance) if they're too heavy to do the former two things. This level of ambiguity makes the handling of spears rather iffy.
What I'm Suggesting
Basically, what I'm suggesting is to lower the minimum requirement for "Extended Melee Range." Let's face it, nobody who has arms is ever going to hit a 3-meter range with a sword unless the sword is 2.5 meters long or more at the blade or if we all of the sudden mutate and develop arms that are 2 meters long (which would be very impractical if you're going grocery shopping with a cart). In terms of melee weapons, lances can go for 2-3 meters long, though like I said, those things are more along the lines of heavy plowing weapons. I'd like to see anyone defend the use of those things.
As for how low the minimum should be? Well, I'm gonna leave that up for discussion because swords are kind of a mess.
Conclusion
Pretty much the current ruling on Extended Melee Range needs to be modified. If this could get highlighted, that would be cool, because this might need quite a bit of discussion before anything can be done.
Hey peeps. So... I'm beginning to see issues with what is considered "Extended Melee Range." As it currently stands, Extended Range is listed as this.:
Extended melee range (ranges from 3 to 10 meters)
This seems QUITE iffy. Why? I'll show ya.:
Weapon Lengths
Now, the main issue involves the melee weapon parts. In "Standard Range," weapon examples are listed as "Knives/daggers, gauntlets, and short-ranged weapons." There, it isn't specified as to what is meant by "short-ranged weapons." I measured a few things around my house that could be weaponized and got this.:
Scalpel: 3.7 cm (blade length)
Steak Knife: 11.7 cm (blade length)
Chef's Knife: 20 cm (blade length) with 12-cm hilt.
Baseball Bat: 82.5 cm (excluding the knob)
Considering an arm has to grasp a weapon to in order to even use it, I measured my own arm with my hand in a grasping position and got 63.5 cm. Let's assume 65 cm for the length of a grasping arm. With the weapons in question, I can get values like these.
Arm w/ Scalpel: ~70 cm
Arm w/ Steak Knife: ~77.5 cm
Arm w/ Chef's Knife: ~86 cm
Arms w/ Baseball Bat: ~130 cm (1.3 m; both hands on hilt)
Note that leeways had to be given here because nobody would be stupid enough to straight-up grab the blade like a hilt. Why? Well, here's what was listed as examples for Extended Melee Range.:
"Sword/sabers, polearms/spears, and explosives such as a thrown grenade would qualify for this range as well."
One can safely consider a baseball bat to be a sword-length weapon. Note that the part of the weapon that DOES the damage is the blade of the weapon. However, it might be just as important to list the total length of a sword. Here's what I got.:
Bronze Age Sword (Naue II): 60-70 cm (total length)
Gladius: 60-85 cm (45-68 cm blade length)
Rapier: 104 cm (average blade length)
Falchion: 95.25 cm (80 cm blade length)
Longsword: 100-130 cm (90-110 cm blade length)
Claymore: 120-140 cm (100-120 cm blade length)
Zweihander: At least 140 cm (total length); grip needs to be a minimum of 25 cm long. Longest specimen known is 213 cm long.
Katana: 60-73 cm (blade length)
Not even the longest sword, a Zweihander reportedly owned by Pier Gerlofs Donia, can match the current definition of "Extended Melee Range."
Now, stuff like spears, polearms, and staffs are left out of this because they are either throwing weapons if they're light enough, jabbing weapons if necessary, or plowing weapons (ex. the lance) if they're too heavy to do the former two things. This level of ambiguity makes the handling of spears rather iffy.
What I'm Suggesting
Basically, what I'm suggesting is to lower the minimum requirement for "Extended Melee Range." Let's face it, nobody who has arms is ever going to hit a 3-meter range with a sword unless the sword is 2.5 meters long or more at the blade or if we all of the sudden mutate and develop arms that are 2 meters long (which would be very impractical if you're going grocery shopping with a cart). In terms of melee weapons, lances can go for 2-3 meters long, though like I said, those things are more along the lines of heavy plowing weapons. I'd like to see anyone defend the use of those things.
As for how low the minimum should be? Well, I'm gonna leave that up for discussion because swords are kind of a mess.
Conclusion
Pretty much the current ruling on Extended Melee Range needs to be modified. If this could get highlighted, that would be cool, because this might need quite a bit of discussion before anything can be done.