Possible AP for Dr Manhattan

[AidenBrooks999]

Large Island Level+ Manhattan?

http://www.narutoforums.com/blog.php?b=22282

o

 

[AidenBrooks999]

B-Bump?

 

[Matthew_Schroeder]

Hello Kaen.

The calc does indeed look good.

However... I am unsure about how this goes. I mean, from my understanding Manhattan's control over atoms and matter was never given a clear limit, and I doubt that the Island feat is that.

 

[AidenBrooks999]

Hello Kaen.
The calc does indeed look good.

ok.

 

[Antoniofer]

The calc seems good, but I think this in some way irrelevent for a characters like Manhattan: if we put him as High 6-C, people maybe will compare him big characters with the same tier, but the really is that he will still being much stronger due durability negation...

 

[TheMightyRegulator]

Edit: Sorry, misread.

Hello Kaen.

The calc does indeed look good.

However... I am unsure about how this goes. I mean, from my understanding Manhattan's control over atoms and matter was never given a clear limit, and I doubt that the Island feat is that.

Then I guess we can insert "probably higher" but what would the "probably" be based on?

 

[AidenBrooks999]

The calc seems good, but I think this in some way irrelevent for a characters like Manhattan: if we put him as High 6-C, people maybe will compare him big characters with the same tier, but the really is that he will still being much stronger due durability negation...

AP is AP >:3

 

[Cropfist]

On a side note, aren't nanosecond reactions equal to FTL+ reactions? Luke Skywalker is rated as such for having them.

 

[TheMightyRegulator]

@Antoniofer, hax doesn't make you stronger in any way. Rather, it gives you versatility and advantages such as ignoring durability, but your AP is the same.

 

[TheMightyRegulator]

On a side note, aren't nanosecond reactions equal to FTL+ reactions? Luke Skywalker is rated as such for having them.

I think there's currently an ongoing discussion about that, brought up by Don'ttalk.

 

[Promestein]

"At least Large Island level+. Probably higher (Said to be bound to the universe)", maybe.

 

[Antoniofer]

maybe we should put him at "High 6-C, probably far higher", cuz when even him can cause that destruction he can desintegrate any corporeal character, no matter their durability

EDIT: Ah, right Mighty, sometime I forget that durability negation==hax, so I'm going with the Prom suggestion

 

[TheMightyRegulator]

Probably higher (Said to be bound to the universe)"

Oh. That's where the idea is from. Going with Prom's suggestion.

 

[The_Everlasting]

"At least Large Island level+. Probably higher (Said to be bound to the universe)", maybe.

Minor note, but we've switched back to "possibly" on the Attack Potency page.

 

[AidenBrooks999]

"At least Large Island level+. Possibly higher (Said to be bound to the universe)"

 

[TheMightyRegulator]

@Ever Where? I don't see it.

 

[The_Everlasting]

@Mighty

https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Attack_Potency?diff=prev&oldid=535955

 

[TheMightyRegulator]

Okay, thank you.

 

[Matthew_Schroeder]

"At least Large Island level, Likely Higher (Add Reasons)"

Seems fine to me.

 

[LordXcano]

On a side note, aren't nanosecond reactions equal to FTL+ reactions? Luke Skywalker is rated as such for having them.

That should be bumped down to just FTL, the high-end of the calc is 5c not 10+c.

I think there's currently an ongoing discussion about that, brought up by Don'ttalk.

Do you have a link? I'd like to read that.

 

[AidenBrooks999]

So.... Necromancy

 

[DontTalk]

@LordXcano: I think it is about this discussion, almost forgot about it.