Possible Addition to Versus Thread Rules

[Antvasima]

It can probably do so, yes.

 

[YungManzi]

I forgot about this

 

[Antvasima]

So what should we do here?

 

[Antvasima]

Asking some more staff members to comment would probably be a good idea in any case.

 

[The_Impress]

We can add this rule:

• Please avoid making matches with conditions that unfairly restrict a majority of one character's arsenal, as these matches possess a poor representation of said character that don't reflect their appropriate forms. Under a case-by-case basis, heavily restricted scenarios for characters wouldn't be added to the profiles on the basis of being a mismatch.

 

[Antvasima]

That seems fine to me, but do we need more staff input first?

 

[The_Impress]

I reckon it's fine to get abit more input

 

[Elizhaa]

This new rule looks fine, to me.

 

[Antvasima]

Feel free to ask other staff members for it then.

 

[Moritzva]

I bargain the new rules have nothing against more unorthodox, unconventional types of matches? I know Promestein would be quite against her card game matches being banned, but while it was discussed in similar threads, the rule proposed says nothing of the sort.

 

[Antvasima]

Somebody should ask Promestein and some administrators to comment here then.

 

[Antoniofer]

Yeah, limiting a fighter with a disease or situational discapacity seems arbitrary by the sake of favoring the other character, I agree with whatever rule stop this kind of stuff.

 

[Mr. Bambu]

I feel like we never allowed this anyways, if based on nothing else other than common sense, but yeah, sure, agreed.

 

[Antvasima]

I think that this has been accepted and can be applied then.

 

[Crabwhale]

I also accept this new rule.

 

[Dargoo_Faust]

I'm mostly neutral on this, although I agree that too many stipulations being acceptible is bad in general for threads.

 

[Antvasima]

We need to come up with a good wording for the regulation text then.