Planck Length's Tier

[Crzer07]

What's the tier of a Planck length?

Simply put, if you (a 10-B being/entity) and your abilities were shrunk down to this size and scale (or smaller) where would you be rated on the tiering scale?

 

[TheSandman31]

Probably 11-B (1-Dimensional)

 

[FanofRPGs]

Quantum Stuff ignores dimensional tiering in real life, and honestly IDK how to deal with it. IMO, they should be 10-C, but most quantum objects are 1-D/0-D (Such as strings and quarks). IMO, we just ignore the fact that they are lower dimensinal and understand it still produces tangible energy and usually has some form of displacement. So 10-C is best.

 

[Crzer07]

Yeah quantum foam, 1-D strings it must be the smallest you can get. You would already be 1 dimensional at this size! Plus this implies to be the irreducible unit of reality, or at least of the multiverse.

 

[Kaltias]

Line level, I think

 

[FanofRPGs]

Yeah quantum foam, 1-D strings it must be the smallest you can get. You would already be 1 dimensional at this size! Plus this implies to be the irreducible unit of reality, or at least of the multiverse.

Keep at mind at such a scale, dimensions don't mean infinite planes of reality like how we define, rather how one moves or displaces. A Quark is much larger than a string (duh) but its a 0-D point, because that's all it displaces. It can't "move" much because its stuck as a mere point, a singularity. Strings are infinite, but only one one level, and can theoretically cut one in half (It happens in Xeelee in fact). Which is why I suggest we don't use our tiering system in regards to real life quantum stuff, as it works completely different from our wiki.