- 12,638
- 414
Hmmm I can agree with “possibly higher”
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is reasonable.ok, so would a "at least 9-C, possibly Higher" be fine?
If that's the case then I don't deserve to live on this wiki9-A was disproven, and 9-B is illogical.
If that's the case, then it can be used. But if there isn't one, then this CRT doesn't need to go further.Isn't there a 9-B calc that was 10x above baseline?
But anyway, 9-C, possibly higher seems fine.
That was a calc for the player/intercity survivors being able to survive falls off of ledges. AFAIK, fall damage doesn't exist in either game and in the original Piggy, there are obstacles where you have to make bridges - where if you cross them without creating the bridge, you will die of fall damage.Isn't there a 9-B calc that was 10x above baseline?
But anyway, 9-C, possibly higher seems fine.
I dunno, this calc seems very sus. It uses higher gravity than normal just because the game engine sets gravity higher, which is done in plenty of games for purely gameplay reasons.9-B could be fine then, it seems like game mechanics though
any thoughts?
There is none iirc, it seems to be game mechanicsBut is there any reason to believe the gravity is actually higher in Piggy world, or is it purely game mechanics?
And he calls us 'bias men'If that's the case then I don't deserve to live on this wiki
Do you have any thoughts on the CRT?And he calls us 'bias men'
Oh yeah if the gravity being high is game mechanics (what I thought too), you could just use standard Earth gravity - which is an entirely separate end that I included in the calc. for intercity, at the very bottom:I dunno, this calc seems very sus. It uses higher gravity than normal just because the game engine sets gravity higher, which is done in plenty of games for purely gameplay reasons.
Is there any lore tie-in that supports higher than Earth standard gravity?
we have, 11 people have agreed to the CRT, this can be closedI think this is fine to apply if we have enough input.