Outer

[Warman]

how does the aleph system work? should the number of dimensions be for example aleph 1 or just that in the verse there are mathematical extensions = a aleph 1 or other

 

[Alexander]

bro,sera mejor que uses el traductor,no te entiendo nada

 

[Warman]

bro,sera mejor que uses el traductor,no te entiendo nada

how does the aleph system work? should the number of dimensions be for example aleph 1 or just that in the verse there are mathematical extensions = a aleph 1 or other

 

[Alexander]

how does the aleph system work? should the number of dimensions be for example aleph 1 or just that in the verse there are mathematical extensions = a aleph 1 or other

ok, aleph null is the lowest level of infinity, and that aleph null is an infinite hierarchy, and an infinite hierarchy is dimensional infinity.
and since aleph 1 is infinitely greater than aleph null, it would mean that aleph 1 infinitely transcending aleph null is outerversal.
so aleph two infinitely transcends aleph 1, so infinite layers in outerversal.
then there is aleph 3 which is infinitely bigger than aleph 2.
continue until aleph omega or absolute infinite, which will be outerversal high in infinite layers.
i don't agree with the scaling of that,i believe that,for being outerversal high,you need to view outerversal,like outerversal view everything below him,or,outerversal trascendent over outerversal.

 

[Warman]

ok, aleph null is the lowest level of infinity, and that aleph null is an infinite hierarchy, and an infinite hierarchy is dimensional infinity.
and since aleph 1 is infinitely greater than aleph null, it would mean that aleph 1 infinitely transcending aleph null is outerversal.
so aleph two infinitely transcends aleph 1, so infinite layers in outerversal.
then there is aleph 3 which is infinitely bigger than aleph 2.
continue until aleph omega or absolute infinite, which will be outerversal high in infinite layers.
i don't agree with the scaling of that,i believe that,for being outerversal high,you need to view outerversal,like outerversal view everything below him,or,outerversal trascendent over outerversal.

so cosmology must be aleph 1 in spatio-temporal dimension or in mathematical extensions (beyond real numbers etc)?

 

[Alexander]

so cosmology must be aleph 1 in spatio-temporal dimension or in mathematical extensions (beyond real numbers etc)?

yes,but that is VSBW,in CSAP,you can use platonic concepts,normal concepts,archetypes,Alephs,etc.

 

[Warman]

yes,but that is VSBW,in CSAP,you can use platonic concepts,normal concepts,archetypes,Alephs,etc.

you are not answering my question aleph 1 must be spatio-temporal dimension or simply mathematical extension / no está respondiendo mi pregunta aleph 1 debe ser una dimensión espacio-temporal o simplemente una extensión matemática

 

[Alexander]

you are not answering my question aleph 1 must be spatio-temporal dimension or simply mathematical extension / no está respondiendo mi pregunta aleph 1 debe ser una dimensión espacio-temporal o simplemente una extensión matemática

lo siento no lo se exactitud

 

[Maitreya12]

Common Alexander W

 

[Nierre]

Common Alexander W

 

[ActuallySpaceMan42]

how does the aleph system work? should the number of dimensions be for example aleph 1 or just that in the verse there are mathematical extensions = a aleph 1 or other

Aleph 2 = Outerversal, which is transcendence over an Uncountably Infinite number of dimensions (Aleph 1) normally.

 

[Warman]

Aleph 2 = Outerversal, which is transcendence over an Uncountably Infinite number of dimensions (Aleph 1) normally.

aleph 1 must be spatio-temporal dimension or simply mathematical extension ?

 

[ActuallySpaceMan42]

aleph 1 must be spatio-temporal dimension or simply mathematical extension ?

It can be both depending on context.

 

[Warman]

It can be both depending on context.

Thanks !

 

[Zelas]

It can be both depending on context.

It is explicitly written in the tiering system that alephs must represent spatio-temporal dimensions so could you elaborate on your point of view on mathematical extensions?