- 61,177
- 14,747
Also also 343 just saying no to Oryx trying to cheat 682 out of being punished
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wokistan said:A perpetual AP gap is by definition an incap, as one party is unable to harm the other.
Victory Conditions: Killing the opponent, removing the opponent from the battlefield for at least one week (BFR), knocking the opponent out for at least one hour, or incapacitating the opponent by putting him in a state in which he can not harm the other fighter(s) for over a day, are to be assumed as victory conditions. |
The explaining is in the rules. If you want to change those rules, make a CRT for it.WeeklyBattles said:@Wok Im sorry but no, ive been in at least five different threads where it was argued vehemently that just pasting the opponent over and over for 24 hours is not an incapacitation. You need to do some serious explaining when everyone else ive talked to has told me how wrong i was to think otherwise.
682 can do the same, if you switch out 'damage' for 'kill' or 'harm in a meaningful way'Wokistan said:He can also just sit there and be stronger while 682 is unable to damage him. Doesn't need to constantly kill it.
If it's not a rule, it's not a rule.WeeklyBattles said:@Wok Dont try to use double standards, you are the one using an invalid argument that goes against a widely accepted wiki standard
GK does that passivelyBobsican said:*Cough*WeeklyBattles said:TL;DR Pasting the opponent over and over again is not a means of incapacitation, make a CRT if you think it should be
Oryx's law kills 682 passively?Wokistan said:As does the law of Oryx, in this key.