Oryx vs Arceus

[NeoSuperior]

There was also the issue that Oryx's Concept Manipulation type being type 2 was not on the profile until recently, else that alone would have decided the match already.

 

[Thelastmlg]

"countless" isn't a number though so they are not applicable. It's the same reason we don't give 2-A for such statements.

still enough to make 2-B higher than a finite amount

 

[NeoSuperior]

That doesn't make any sense. There is no such a thing as a "not finite but less than infinite". It's either finite or infinite.

Well, I guess "undefined" like something divided by zero, or imaginary numbers like (square root of -1) also exist, but I don't think you are refering to any of these here.

 

[Epsilon_R]

Me too. Imo countless should be either finite or infinite but not something between

 

[RotofBots]

This wiki usually treats "not finite" as transfinite, for the most part

 

[NeoSuperior]

That just seems dumb. It's either a "too vague statement" based on our low-balling standards, i.e. remains as the highest but most concrete feat, or its taken literally as being actual infinite. That "transfinite" seems like some sort of argument got out of hand and this was decided on as a "compromise" to prevent both side from throwing a tantrum. It's completely inconsistent with everything else on this wiki.

If "transfinite" is a thing, then at least make a new key for it like High 2-B or Low 2-A. It's quite unfair otherwise to all the other 2-B profiles. In the first place having everything between 1000 Multiverses and (infinite Multiverses minus one) all in a single key was not the best idea to begin with.

 

[Schnee_One]

Stomp FRA