- 15,339
- 22,148
Neutral, leaning towards agreeing I suppose.
@LordTracer @Damage3245 Would you be willing to help evaluate this?
@LordTracer @Damage3245 Would you be willing to help evaluate this?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why not?This doesn't really seem to be physical lifting strength to me for the feat.
Why not?
The LS comes from the displacement of the mantle caused by his tail, not him pulling up the energy.It looks more like an energy manipulation feat to me. His tail touches the ground to trigger it, but I don't see anything showing that he is using literal suction from tail his tail to physically drag the energy up.
I don’t think suction was used here… but.. if you look at layers on both panels, you see little curves in the first panel and the energy breaking through those curves in the second. That should signify suction.It looks more like an energy manipulation feat to me. His tail touches the ground to trigger it, but I don't see anything showing that he is using literal suction from tail his tail to physically drag the energy up.
both of us interpretation would mean that actually not just one personAlso, as you can see in the following panels, the energy balls isn't pushing anything above it, only the layers it passed through got affected.
Your interpretation would require the energy sphere also pushing the mantle and the earth crust just like the inner layers, which didn't happen.
Here Nikhelton calculated the weight of the individual layers, there are single layers that reach Class Z.Can someone actually link the Class Z calc? It’s not in the OP for some reason.
At least two staff need to accept this before it is applied
"Orochi pulled energy which then distorted the inner core".
This argument is pure nonsense when we are currently only calculating Orochi lifting the inner layers, completely ignoring the movement created by the energy sphere later on.
So yeah I agree with the upgrade, Orochi lifted the inner layers independently of the energy sphere.
This can finally be applied, I believe.Okay, after looking over that, I agree with the upgrade.
That wasn't even close to the argument. Orochi was going to become Class Z because the layers of the Earth that he distorted were that heavy, but warping something with energy isn't physical lifting strength.
You're conflating this with another (superfluous) argument over Orochi extending his tail to the core and pulling up the energy directly.
I guess KT is neutral and also Damage does not agree, so you will need more staff input but while we are at that.I'm not sure if distorting the core really scales to lifting strength. It seems to be more of a by product due to him pulling up the energy than Orochi seriously lifting it.
KT, ByAsura are neutralI guess KT is neutral and also Damage does not agree, so you will need more staff input but while we are at that.
The LS comes from the displacement of the mantle caused by his tail, not him pulling up the energy.
Here is the displacement the tail caused.How exactly was the mantle displaced by his tail? The tail did not extend all the way down to the core, did it? I don't see a sign of that.
There are lots of problems with your arguments let me start one by oneHere is the displacement the tail caused.
Orochi said that he would pull the energy directly from the Earth, and we see him drive his tall down. What else would that be? Orochi just dipping his tail in the magma pool for the fun of it?
This was already accepted.There are lots of problems with your arguments let me start one by one
1.) Why didn’t the distortion happen when he was diving his tail down?
No it’s not, you got two staffs in agreement and two in disagreementThis was already accepted.
No it did not, which will not be so if the tail is the one doing the distortionIt did?
1.) Why didn’t the distortion happen when he was diving his tail down?
2 staff agreements, 3 staff neutrals, and 1 staff disagreementNo it’s not, you got two staffs in agreement and two in disagreement
Which means not enough to get it passed2 staff agreements, 3 staff neutrals, and 1 staff disagreement
What is the requirement?Which means not enough to get it passed
Outside of staff, nearly everyone in this thread has agreed.There isn’t a requirement, but you do need more of a consensus than that.
Except your logic for trying to pass it is extremely faulty and has lots of holes that you have not even answeredOutside of staff, nearly everyone in this thread has agreed.
This isn't even an upgrade, or something new. This rating was removed in a thread that literally only had 7 messages. This should be on his page.
Make a proper CRT to remove it. The point of this thread isn't really an upgrade. It's to restore a rating that was removed because of a thread that only had 3 people speak in it.Except your logic for trying to pass it is extremely faulty and has lots of holes that you have not even answered
Why would I make a CRT for something not accepted? That’s funny man.Make a proper CRT to remove it. The point of this thread isn't really an upgrade. It's to restore a rating that was removed because of a thread that only had 3 people speak in it.