• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

One Piece: King Kong Gun

Status
Not open for further replies.
"one shot doflamingo" isnt how he got High 6-C

the feat he performed of folding dressrosa is the High 6-C part
It's still a justification for the Calc. That attack could one shot doffy while the rest of gear 4th attacks couldn't.
 
It's still a justification for the Calc. That attack could one shot doffy while the rest of gear 4th attacks couldn't.
no.... him oneshotting doflamingo does NOT get him High 6-C

the feat of folding dress rosa is High 6-C


him oneshotting doflamingo ISNT a high 6-C calc, you realize that?
thats an improper justification
 
no.... him oneshotting doflamingo does NOT get him High 6-C

the feat of folding dress rosa is High 6-C


him oneshotting doflamingo ISNT a high 6-C calc, you realize that?
thats an improper justification
I know... It's still a justification on why it's higher than luffy's other gear 4th attacks.
 
it's obviously higher, but KKG is valued at High 6-C now for the feat he performed, so listing it as "he performed this feat" is far better than "one shot doflamingo"
I am saying to put both... As they compliment each other. The profile otherwise have no justification on why KKG is stronger than his other gear 4th attacks
 
It looks like the changes have been made. I don't think the justification for beating Doffy needs to stay.
 
"one shot doflamingo" isnt how he got High 6-C

the feat he performed of folding dressrosa is the High 6-C part
Alright, this makes sense. I will just re-word to describe the feat, and fix the grammar a little, "Performed This Feat" is not proper.

It looks like the changes have been made. I don't think the justification for beating Doffy needs to stay.
It is grammatically improper, though.

Wouldn't "Destroyed and folded a portion of Dressrosa" be better?
 
I am saying to put both... As they compliment each other. The profile otherwise have no justification on why KKG is stronger than his other gear 4th attacks
theres no need To. It does have a justification wdym? The calc itself is a justification, because it comes from folding dressrosa, that’s already enough of a justification, oneshotting Doflamingo has nothing to do with that feat.
 
Sorry for commenting after everyone's consensus, but shouldn't Luffy's Gear Fourth durability scale to KKG too? Since the KKG manifests itself in Luffy's arm and thanks to his body's elasticity with haki, he is not destroyed by the energy generated by his own body through the impact of the attack.
 
Sorry for commenting after everyone's consensus, but shouldn't Luffy's Gear Fourth durability scale to KKG too? Since the KKG manifests itself in Luffy's arm and thanks to his body's elasticity with haki, he is not destroyed by the energy generated by his own body through the impact of the attack.
Yeah I agree, it should be.
 
Sorry for commenting after everyone's consensus, but shouldn't Luffy's Gear Fourth durability scale to KKG too? Since the KKG manifests itself in Luffy's arm and thanks to his body's elasticity with haki, he is not destroyed by the energy generated by his own body through the impact of the attack.
Rubber negates Newton's 3rd law
 
Aren't Luffy's tanking feats of elasticity attributed to his durability on the wikia? btw he was using haki to generate the attack as well.
 
Well, I disagree with scaling his durability to the KKG.

I don't know if that discussion is fit to be here, as that's not the purpose of the CRT at all (which has been applied already).

Can we close this?
 
I didn't know, but it's weird anyway.

Yes, but the haki still affects him, or Kaido wouldn't have given a one-shot and Katakuri wouldn't have hurt him either.
Kaido one-shot due to conquerors coating, this is confirmed in Chapter 1010.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top