- 18,728
- 13,753
That should still be a justification
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"one shot doflamingo" isnt how he got High 6-CThat should still be a justification
It's still a justification for the Calc. That attack could one shot doffy while the rest of gear 4th attacks couldn't."one shot doflamingo" isnt how he got High 6-C
the feat he performed of folding dressrosa is the High 6-C part
no.... him oneshotting doflamingo does NOT get him High 6-CIt's still a justification for the Calc. That attack could one shot doffy while the rest of gear 4th attacks couldn't.
I know... It's still a justification on why it's higher than luffy's other gear 4th attacks.no.... him oneshotting doflamingo does NOT get him High 6-C
the feat of folding dress rosa is High 6-C
him oneshotting doflamingo ISNT a high 6-C calc, you realize that?
thats an improper justification
it's obviously higher, but KKG is valued at High 6-C now for the feat he performed, so listing it as "he performed this feat" is far better than "one shot doflamingo"I know... It's still a justification on why it's higher than luffy's other gear 4th attacks.
I am saying to put both... As they compliment each other. The profile otherwise have no justification on why KKG is stronger than his other gear 4th attacksit's obviously higher, but KKG is valued at High 6-C now for the feat he performed, so listing it as "he performed this feat" is far better than "one shot doflamingo"
Alright, this makes sense. I will just re-word to describe the feat, and fix the grammar a little, "Performed This Feat" is not proper."one shot doflamingo" isnt how he got High 6-C
the feat he performed of folding dressrosa is the High 6-C part
It is grammatically improper, though.It looks like the changes have been made. I don't think the justification for beating Doffy needs to stay.
theres no need To. It does have a justification wdym? The calc itself is a justification, because it comes from folding dressrosa, that’s already enough of a justification, oneshotting Doflamingo has nothing to do with that feat.I am saying to put both... As they compliment each other. The profile otherwise have no justification on why KKG is stronger than his other gear 4th attacks
i think that’s fine as wellAlright, this makes sense. I will just re-word to describe the feat, and fix the grammar a little, "Performed This Feat" is not proper.
It is grammatically improper, though.
Wouldn't "Destroyed and folded a portion of Dressrosa" be better?
Done. Let's cease any further discussion, as the changes have been made, and it is properly described.i think that’s fine as well
Yeah I agree, it should be.Sorry for commenting after everyone's consensus, but shouldn't Luffy's Gear Fourth durability scale to KKG too? Since the KKG manifests itself in Luffy's arm and thanks to his body's elasticity with haki, he is not destroyed by the energy generated by his own body through the impact of the attack.
Rubber negates Newton's 3rd lawSorry for commenting after everyone's consensus, but shouldn't Luffy's Gear Fourth durability scale to KKG too? Since the KKG manifests itself in Luffy's arm and thanks to his body's elasticity with haki, he is not destroyed by the energy generated by his own body through the impact of the attack.
nope, we removed that in one of the other threadsAren't Luffy's tanking feats of elasticity attributed to his durability on the wikia?
haki with an extremely large surface area, this wouldn't scale to Luffy's durability unless there was a really good reasonbtw he was using haki to generate the attack as well.
Luffy in G4 still retains his elasticity, despite using hakibtw he was using haki to generate the attack as well.
I didn't know, but it's weird anyway.nope, we removed that in one of the other threads
Yes, but the haki still affects him, or Kaido wouldn't have given a one-shot and Katakuri wouldn't have hurt him either.Luffy in G4 still retains his elasticity, despite using haki
Kaido one-shot due to conquerors coating, this is confirmed in Chapter 1010.I didn't know, but it's weird anyway.
Yes, but the haki still affects him, or Kaido wouldn't have given a one-shot and Katakuri wouldn't have hurt him either.
pretty much, its purpose has been fulfilled.@KingTempest; shall we close this thread now?