Hasty12345
Username Only- 6,455
- 5,169
King is stated by Zoro to not be a swordsman.When was King stated a swordsman? Or Vista?
You can also simply not know what a duck looks like and be mistaken.
Your argument isn't an argument.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
King is stated by Zoro to not be a swordsman.When was King stated a swordsman? Or Vista?
You can also simply not know what a duck looks like and be mistaken.
it doesn't matter anyway... Shanks or Zoro can be a swordsmen and still not get the WSS title by doing what Zoro said against King to win the fightIt's not really a debate, Mihawk's vivre card doesn't even call Shanks a swordsman, it explicitly calls him a sword user.
Just wait until Shanks' Sword turns into a big bird and Shanks starts using hakihameha's.
Shanks, who is left-handed by nature, used to carry a long sword on his right hip. He must have been one of the best at swordsmanship in the world, given that he and Mihawk were rivals in the past.
So revise King's profile, cause it directly calls his ass a swordsman.King is stated by Zoro to not be a swordsman.
One swims, walks, and can fly, one runs on exclusively land. Your argument throws Occam's Razor out the window, and for what? Ya can literally wait for Shanks to just fight Mihawk again, or for Mihawk to collect an anti-feat or two and knock him down a peg.You can also simply not know what a duck looks like and be mistaken.
Your argument isn't an argument.
Zoro is fine letting his ambitions of swordsmanships go if it means making Luffy pirate king... That is why he said what he said against Kingwhile Zoro is 1000% fine with Haki usage seeing as he spams the shit.
To be fair he had someone else shoot him(not saying Shanks doesn't have a history of some dishonorable tactics, BTW)Also if we being fr... Shanks isn't the type to fight respectfully and honorably... Like what King did in the fight
![]()
So can I, but until ***** boy is stated to not be a swordsman or Mihawk gets an anti-feat, I'm still comfy putting Mihawk above him.I can see Shanks fighting however he wants, just a sword as his main weapon
And this changes my statement why? Zoro still has that ambition to my knowledge, and every sword user in the verse Hakidicks anyone they can lolZoro is fine letting his ambitions of swordsmanships go if it means making Luffy pirate king... That is why he said what he said against King
Who said using haki means you're not a swordsman?So revise King's profile, cause it directly calls his ass a swordsman.
It also could be because King turns into a ******* dinosaur, tries to steal people's swords, and blows himself up, while Zoro is 1000% fine with Haki usage seeing as he spams the shit.
Occam's razor doesn't work because Zoro tells us having a sword and using haki doesn't make you a swordsman.One swims, walks, and can fly, one runs on exclusively land. Your argument throws Occam's Razor out the window, and for what? Ya can literally wait for Shanks to just fight Mihawk again, or for Mihawk to collect an anti-feat or two and knock him down a peg.
By the basis of a title given to him by others in the verse..? If that's the case you should have Kaido > anyone in the verse alsoSo can I, but until ***** boy is stated to not be a swordsman or Mihawk gets an anti-feat, I'm still comfy putting Mihawk above him.
he still has the ambition yes... But at any moment he can start fighting without swordsmanships... Which wouldn't grant him wss if he fought that way against MihawkAnd this changes my statement why? Zoro still has that ambition to my knowledge, and every sword user in the verse Hakidicks anyone they can lol
It's not about what you fight with, being a swordsman is abiding by a set of beliefs. Zoro doesn't stop using swordskills when he declares he'd forgo being a swordsman to beat King if it means Luffy becomes PK.Even if we argue Shanks has more than swordsmanship, the question is what can he have that makes it so he isn't an actual swordsman?
Is it a Devil Fruit? I can't imagine that'd be it since Kaku and Issho have fruits and are still swordsmen.
Is it some type of martial art? I also doubt that since he only has one arm (makes it very hard to fight like Garp or Sabo) and kicking doesn't seem as efficient as fighting with a sword especially given that Gryphon can equally clash with Whitebeard's naginata and Yoru (both of which are supreme grade blades).
I just don't see any way for him to fight that would make it so he's not a swordsman without also actively handicapping him hard
I'm not going to dignify this with a proper response. Look at the previous page.Who said using haki means you're not a swordsman?
And WSM is a title shared, certainly. If we want to hardasses about this, Shanks was never stated to be WSM after Whitebeard up and croaked, so he either was never equal to Whitebeard(Doubtful, lol, considering his clash with Akainu) or WSM is something referring to Primebeard.The profiles also say Shanks is equal to the WSM, WB title diffs Mihawk.
Zoro also doesn't like it when people try to steal his shit.Occam's razor doesn't work because Zoro tells us having a sword and using haki doesn't make you a swordsman.
By the basis of his title and other statements saying Shanks may not be up to snuff with him anymore. But like I said, feats have power over statements, so I maintain a wait and see attitude.By the basis of a title given to him by others in the verse..? If that's the case you should have Kaido > anyone in the verse also
All I'm gonna say is Luffy or Garp would never take time out of their day to learn Roger's sword techniques and perfect them. Hell even Law probably wouldn't do that and he uses his sword a LOT.It's not about what you fight with, being a swordsman is abiding by a set of beliefs. Zoro doesn't stop using swordskills when he declares he'd forgo being a swordsman to beat King if it means Luffy becomes PK.
I'm not going to dignify this response by looking at the previous page.I'm not going to dignify this with a proper response. Look at the previous page.
My point was the profiles have loads of things wrong with them.And WSM is a title shared, certainly. If we want to hardasses about this, Shanks was never stated to be WSM after Whitebeard up and croaked, so he either was never equal to Whitebeard(Doubtful, lol, considering his clash with Akainu) or WSM is something referring to Primebeard.
Good for him?Zoro also doesn't like it when people try to steal his shit.
Retaining skills from a time he trained in swordsmanship doesn't mean he still abides by whatever code makes you a swordsman, guess we can argue with Zoro as to what that is.There's a reason Shanks has been fighting with swords since he was a child and has bothered to fight swordsmen like Mihawk multiple times (even trying to duel with him after he lost his arm) and learn advanced sword techniques. He wouldn't do all this if he wasn't a committed swordsman.
FairI'm not going to dignify this response by looking at the previous page.
Well make a general CRT then just fixing the little things lolMy point was the profiles have loads of things wrong with them.
And we have no idea what Zoro's codes here are, for all we know it includes [REDACTED]Good for him?
What's a swordd?He still will forgo being a swordsman for Luffy and still use a swordd.
Since when was Zoro the benchmark for who is and isn't a swordsman?I'm not going to dignify this response by looking at the previous page.
My point was the profiles have loads of things wrong with them.
Good for him?
He still will forgo being a swordsman for Luffy and still use a swordd.
Retaining skills from a time he trained in swordsmanship doesn't mean he still abides by whatever code makes you a swordsman, guess we can argue with Zoro as to what that is.
He's not, but it's clear holding a sword and using one doesn't make you a swordsman.Since when was Zoro the benchmark for who is and isn't a swordsman?
Who said Shiryu was a swordsman?Shiryu is a swordsman and he's the complete opposite of Zoro. He sneak attacks people, uses hostages, and kills people far weaker than him on purpose purely because he gets pleasure from it. That is the complete opposite of what someone like Zoro or Oden would do but I never saw someone claim Shiryu isn't a swordsman.
At the end of the day, there isn't a definitive way that a swordsman should behave. They all have different fighting styles, beliefs, and codes.
My bad I confused him for a different character. I forgot about his interaction with Magellan where Magellan said he'd hand him his boxing gloves if he played nice and cooperated with them. I don't know why I'd assume that Shiryu consistently wields a sword every single time we see him fight with him even being a parallel to Zoro in terms of how much he loves and needs his sword.He's not, but it's clear holding a sword and using one doesn't make you a swordsman.
Zoro has never shown any interest in fighting Shanks, maybe he doesn't consider him a swordsman
Who said Shiryu was a swordsman?
The core issues here is whether or not using a sword makes you a swordsman when Zoro doesn't think so. You can't keep using the fact he uses a sword to prove he's a swordsman when that fact is what's in dispute.My bad I confused him for a different character. I forgot about his interaction with Magellan where Magellan said he'd hand him his boxing gloves if he played nice and cooperated with them. I don't know why I'd assume that Shiryu consistently wields a sword every single time we see him fight with him even being a parallel to Zoro in terms of how much he loves and needs his sword.
If he solely fights with a sword and is skilled with one what are you going to call him?The core issues here is whether or not using a sword makes you a swordsman when Zoro doesn't think so. You can't keep using the fact he uses a sword to prove he's a swordsman when that fact is what's in dispute.
The same one Mihawk's vivre card uses for Shanks, sword user because they use a sword but don't abide by whatever code makes you a swordsman.If he solely fights with a sword and is skilled with one what are you going to call him?
What specific term do you use for someone like that?
Go to sleep man.The same one Mihawk's vivre card uses for Shanks, sword user because they use a sword but don't abide by whatever code makes you a swordsman.
It's disingenuous to say abiding by a code has no say in whether you're a swordsman or not when Mihawk brings it up in his introduction, and Zoro alludes to it in Wano. It's not some made up fan fiction.Go to sleep man.
To be blunt.What does that matter, the premise is faulty, using a sword doesn't make you a swordsman.
Also to be blunt.To be blunt.
In One Piece, everybody with a sword is considered a swordsman.
Oda called Big Mom a swordsman and she has no type of "way of the sword"Also to be blunt.
I obviously disagree.
Are you referring to Vivre cards?Oda called Big Mom a swordsman and she has no type of "way of the sword"
Oda called King a swordsman and he blatantly has no training with the sword
For both yesAre you referring to Vivre cards?
I think you can assume my response to that without much thought.For both yes
This is fr valid... 85% of fans don't think like thatBut like I said, feats have power over statements, so I maintain a wait and see attitude.
Does do not exist, either incorrect mistranslation or misinterpreting what it saysBy the basis of his title and other statements saying Shanks may not be up to snuff with him anymore.
True... But idk it can still depend on if the translations are correct or not (Since swordsmanships words can translate and transfer to something else)To be blunt.
In One Piece, everybody with a sword is considered a swordsman.
Didn't see swordswomen in her vivrecard or anything alike... Only this existedFor both yes
It doesn't even say swordsmanship but a sword technique instead also (Also seems more like she can handle the power of using the swords that way, seems to be what it means)She can easily handle the fierce sword technique of the Giant Tribe, “Iikoku”!
yee he legit has a Masked Swordsman statementOda called King a swordsman and he blatantly has no training with the sword
ain't he (and shanks for that matter) in the "swordsman" colorspread?Who said Shiryu was a swordsman?
that does not exist... Unless you're talking about the fan art section?ain't he (and shanks for that matter) in the "swordsman" colorspread?
Oh damn, didnt know it was fan art mbthat does not exist... Unless you're talking about the fan art section?
YeahI think you can assume my response to that without much thought.