• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

One Piece General Discussion: Elbaph

Where's the panel that says Don Krieg can't be above Machvise?
At some point you can just assume these things lol
 
How though??
Portrayal.

He has very strong Haki on par with if not above Roger due to his being the benchmark that Dorry and Brogy used to compare to Joyboy even though they've met Roger, Rayleigh and Gaban in the past.

At 15 years of age he replicated an advanced conqueror's attack from Roger while Gaban and Rayleigh were incapable of doing the same.

He's constantly hyped up as a genius and a prodigy and Roger's successor so it would make no sense if a current day Shanks who is in his prime was not bare minimum Roger level.
 
Prove Aramaki forged his black blade
I'll give you that. My question still stands though.
Portrayal.

He has very strong Haki on par with if not above Roger due to his being the benchmark that Dorry and Brogy used to compare to Joyboy even though they've met Roger, Rayleigh and Gaban in the past.

At 15 years of age he replicated an advanced conqueror's attack from Roger while Gaban and Rayleigh were incapable of doing the same.

He's constantly hyped up as a genius and a prodigy and Roger's successor so it would make no sense if a current day Shanks who is in his prime was not bare minimum Roger level.
Wait when did Dorry and Brogy meet the Roger Pirates?
Also he was meant to be Roger's successor before he gave that role up to Luffy. I think he had the potential to surpass Roger easily, but the second he gave up on eating the fruit and lost his arm, he was permanently below Roger (although their fight would still be an extreme diff)
 
Wait when did Dorry and Brogy meet the Roger Pirates?

Also he was meant to be Roger's successor before he gave that role up to Luffy. I think he had the potential to surpass Roger easily, but the second he gave up on eating the fruit and lost his arm, he was permanently below Roger (although their fight would still be an extreme diff)
?
 
Ngl Rocks is definitely stronger than anyone we’ve actively seen in the series, and it’s not that close. Dude killed an admiral like, mid-diff at most considering he wasn’t injured enough to inhibit his Imu rage baiting shenanigans.

Only one I think could pull off a similar thing would maybe be like, Kaido, but that’s mostly because of how ******* bulky he is; it’d undoubtedly take longer and he’d fight harder.

He also seems like a cool character and so I am biased 🤪
 
Shanks and Mihawk are likely superior to Roger and Xebec as well.
I really find unlikely for either to them are superior than Xebec or Roger.

Similar or even equal? Sure but even that's debatable.

Straight up superior? Just no.

tumblr_inline_npzz0rVHNd1qme5gl_640.png
 
Potential Top 5 of the verse (in their prime)? 👀

1) Joyboy

2) Imu

3) Rocks D. Xebec

4) Gol D. Roger

5) Monkey D. Garp
If we ignore "potential" and EoS, I think Kaido, Big Mom and Sengoku are above Garp and Teach is below that RN. Don't think we've seen enough of xebec to put him that high but he cant be lower than that
Mihawk solos tho
 
1) Joyboy

2) Imu

3) Gol D. Roger

4) Whitebeard

5) Rocks D. Xebec
⬆️ That would be mine... Xebec was Roger's strongest adversary, but Xebec was defeated and then Wb become stronger, becoming Rogers only main rival, the only one being capable of going toe to toe with Roger

This list from Kaido is basically a reference and a further evidence of that being the case, from left to right
Luffy-s-Potential.png
 
This list from Kaido is basically a reference and a further evidence of that being the case, from left to right
Luffy-s-Potential.png
For this specific piece of evidence, wouldn’t it make more sense for it to be right to left, since this is Japanese literature, thus signifying Xebec as the strongest?
 
For this specific piece of evidence, wouldn’t it make more sense for it to be right to left, since this is Japanese literature, thus signifying Xebec as the strongest?
that would make oden stronger than wb and Roger tho

The "image" isn't meant to be taken as Japanese literature, it's all in the middle inside a panel... It's more like a mini color spread 🤔
 
...no? It'd make him weaker.

It's go Oden<WB<Shanks<Roger<Xeroc
uhh what? If we are using jp literature it goes... Wb... Roger... Oden... Shanks and Xebec

One way it could go is... Right to left... From weakest to strongest and then it goes up (makes sense with the whole, how high will your ceiling go)

Oden... Shanks... Xebec... Wb.... Roger
 
⬆️ That would be mine... Xebec was Roger's strongest adversary, but Xebec was defeated and then Wb become stronger, becoming Rogers only main rival, the only one being capable of going toe to toe with Roger

This list from Kaido is basically a reference and a further evidence of that being the case, from left to right
Luffy-s-Potential.png
I wish that panel never existed. I really do. It ruined the powerscaling in this community man
 
yee... I think bro just on a trolling streak or something

In what way/order would he be the weakest

Xebec's head is under Shanks head, if that's what you are trying to go with
 
The list isn't even meant to be about the strongest pirates or characters in general. Strength is obviously a factor given how much of a powerscaling geek Kaido is, but respect and whether or not he actually met certain people plays a big role in this too.
For example, Kaido likely never met Mihawk, so he could never end up in Kaido's top 5. Yet Mihawk is still obviously above Shanks given that we're told this multiple times by trustworthy sources.
I also seriously doubt Big Mom and Shiki are below Oden, yet they're not on the list either. Likely because Kaido never had a serious death match with them like he did with Oden so he didn't respect them as much.
 
The list isn't even meant to be about the strongest pirates or characters in general. Strength is obviously a factor given how much of a powerscaling geek Kaido is, but respect and whether or not he actually met certain people plays a big role in this too.
For example, Kaido likely never met Mihawk, so he could never end up in Kaido's top 5. Yet Mihawk is still obviously above Shanks given that we're told this multiple times by trustworthy sources.
I also seriously doubt Big Mom and Shiki are below Oden, yet they're not on the list either. Likely because Kaido never had a serious death match with them like he did with Oden so he didn't respect them as much.
Powerscaling between them listed exists

Kaido already shared how Roger was the number 1 because of his haki

Then the list would need to follow based on that and the statement about luffy's ceiling, the way to read it one by one from weakest to strongest, the most logical way would be Oden, Shanks, Xebec... (Then goes up to the right) WB, Roger
I also seriously doubt Big Mom and Shiki are below Oden, yet they're not on the list either. Likely because Kaido never had a serious death match with them like he did with Oden so he didn't respect them as much.
Going to assume it would mean Oden's attack power > Big Mom or Shiki

Which legit does make sense, being capable of giving him a permanent huge scar
Yet Mihawk is still obviously above Shanks given that we're told this multiple times by trustworthy sources.
No.
 
Last edited:
Powerscaling between them listed exists

Kaido already shared how Roger was the number 1 because of his haki

Then the list would need to follow based on that and the statement about luffy's ceiling, the way to read it one by one from weakest to strongest, the most logical way would be Oden, Shanks, Xebec... (Then goes up to the right) WB, Roger

Going to assume it would mean Oden's attack power > Big Mom or Shiki

Which legit does make sense, being capable of giving him a permanent huge scar
How is Xebec below Roger and Whitebeard when he was said to be Roger's strongest adversary?
Then why have Mihawk be the WSS while Shanks is alive?
 
How is Xebec below Roger and Whitebeard when he was said to be Roger's strongest adversary?
How does that make him the strongest?

Wb wasn't Roger's adversary

It can also be taken as the toughest person he had to overcome... Like luffy vs doffy < luffy vs Lucci... Lucci was a way stronger adversary but wasn't stronger than doffy
Then why have Mihawk be the WSS while Shanks is alive?
Because his whole thing is about the way of the sword... That is why he has the title, being given to him by others in the verse, which is the goal of swordsmasters...
1023-008.png
1023-009.png

If you defeat Mihawk the way King just did, you wouldn't become WSS even if swords are your main fighting style

Shanks's goal isn't about becoming WSS but to claim the One Piece, not once has he tried to claim that title like every other swordsmasters do

Shanks and Mihawk dueled in the past... Wasn't an actual fight but a competition over swords skills (Stated) further proving that to be the case

Mihawk has only been confirmed to have the better sword skills than shanks, having the title of WSS doesn't automatically make you stronger than everyone in the verse who uses a sword... That's just pure bias and headcanon
 
Last edited:
How does that make him the strongest?

Wb wasn't Roger's adversary

It can also be taken as the toughest person he had to overcome... Like luffy vs doffy < luffy vs Lucci... Lucci was a way stronger adversary but wasn't stronger than doffy

Because his whole thing is about the way of the sword... That is why he has the title, being given to him by others in the verse, which is the goal of swordsmasters...
1023-008.png
1023-009.png

If you defeat Mihawk the way King just did, you wouldn't become WSS even if swords are your main fighting style

Shanks's goal isn't about becoming WSS but to claim the One Piece, not once has he tried to claim that title like every other swordsmasters do

Shanks and Mihawk dueled in the past... Wasn't an actual fight but a competition over swords skills (Stated) further proving that to be the case

Mihawk has only been confirmed to have the better sword skills than shanks, having the title of WSS doesn't automatically make you stronger than everyone in the verse who uses a sword... That's just pure bias and headcanon
Sure. But Garp and Sengoku were adversaries of Roger and equal to him as well. If Rocks is above them.. You can do the rest.
Also do you have a panel of Shanks fighting without a sword?
 
The "fighting without a sword" argument is so dumb. Can you prove holding a sword makes you a swordsman?
 
Sure. But Garp and Sengoku were adversaries of Roger and equal to him as well. If Rocks is above them.. You can do the rest.
I mean sure but again that doesn't refute this point
It can also be taken as the toughest person he had to overcome... Like luffy vs doffy < luffy vs Lucci... Lucci was a way stronger adversary but wasn't stronger than doffy
Xebec was defeated... The rest could've became stronger
0957-011.png

Also do you have a panel of Shanks fighting without a sword?
I don't need one with what I've already said but...
1055-015.png
 
Last edited:
What does that matter, the premise is faulty, using a sword doesn't make you a swordsman.
Oh, I'm sure the guy, who we have only ever seen use his sword or haki to fight, which are generally swordsman things to do, ISN'T a swordsman. If we only see the guy doing swordsman things, and copying moves from another person who does exclusively swordsman things, AND had a rivalry with a swordsman before he lost one of his arms, he's probably a ******* swordsman.
 
Oh, I'm sure the guy, who we have only ever seen use his sword or haki to fight, which are generally swordsman things to do, ISN'T a swordsman. If we only see the guy doing swordsman things, and copying moves from another person who does exclusively swordsman things, AND had a rivalry with a swordsman before he lost one of his arms, he's probably a ******* swordsman.
When was Roger stated a swordsman?

Ask Zoro what it means to be a swordsman, because fighting with a sword and using haki isn't sufficient.
 
Here we go with the bs swordsman debate... 🙉 You guys are lost fr
It's not really a debate, Mihawk's vivre card doesn't even call Shanks a swordsman, it explicitly calls him a sword user.

Just wait until Shanks' Sword turns into a big bird and Shanks starts using hakihameha's.
 
When was Roger stated a swordsman?
When was King stated a swordsman? Or Vista?
Ask Zoro what it means to be a swordsman, because fighting with a sword and using haki isn't sufficient.
If it looks like a duck, sounds like a duck, and moves like a duck, you don't call it an ostrich. Hell, he's literally called SHANKS, "slash or stab (someone)" down to his name he's a swordsman lmfao
 
Back
Top