You still use the insects as an example of much smaller creatures actually harm larger creatures.
However this doesn't work as insects are do not harm larger animals via raw strength, but rather via piercing attacks like mosquito's mouth or bee's sting, which allow them to pierce thicker skin.
With its completely different to what Jack did and was suppost to do, as i stated before, meaning the comparison don't work at all.
You misrepresented the argument by focusing on a very specific thing when it doesn't represent what I actually said.
First you chose a mosquito, which is just one out of many species of insects.
Then you're debunking my entire argument by focusing on insects, when my comment specifically said "
Smaller animals or insects".
Thirdly, disregarding all of that above, I already said that my point is
surface area. Even if its piercing damage, a sharp object still requires force to puncture and damage things.
Coincidentally, piercing damage is one of the classic examples of surface area damage, since it's just attacking at a really really small surface area.
Which happens to relate to Jack, who is
so much smaller compared to Zunesha that it's not surprising that he can damage it. It might as well act similar to a piercing damage, though that's just an assumption on my part.
Disclaimer
I'm not saying Jack compared to Zunesha is literally as weak as an insect compared to a, let's say, a human. Which I believe like you're mistaking my argument for. I'm well aware that Jack wound need sufficient strength to harm Zunesha via AP.
It's not a literal or a 1:1 comparison, since that doesn't work as mass would be taken into account, which is beside the point. It was all about surface area.
And that like Damage said, there's probably better stuff to scale Jack from that would probably place him in the same tier. Harming Zunesha is more like a supporting evidence than the main evidence, though again that's just my opinion.
