- 2,356
- 933
I watch and wait until someone eventually claps math 3 for FTL acceleration due to gravity, trust me its regrettable happened before
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The "I'm not going to attack you just yet!" is said in response to Ace saying that Blackbeard's darkness is "nowhere near me."Tbh I really… don’t see how this doesn’t work? Like, Blackbeard can choose what he affects, that’s why he’s not absolutely annihilating literally everything
The darkness is literally below the house/wood he's standing on.The "I'm not going to attack you just yet!" is said in response to Ace saying that Blackbeard's darkness is "nowhere near me."
A straightforward interpretation of that is that Blackbeard isn't attacking Ace because he didn't send his darkness to go out directly under Ace. If he had, then when he activated his Black Hole technique I expect that Ace would have gotten dragged down like everything else directly in contact with it. As for why Ace isn't getting caught up in it despite only being a few feet away? That could simply be due to Blackbeard's gravity not being literally as strong as a black hole, which would also be why he isn't making the area completely dark by absorbing all the light in the area.
1. The blackholes bb send out have infinite gravity, which is a trait shared by rl black holes.Anyway, DT brought up the issue that we have standards about Black Holes which Blackbeard's ability does not appear to meet.
2. Things actually surviving arent in the standards stating to be an anti feat, the characters would just gain resistance to blackholes.Aside from recognizing what is not a realistic black hole, it is also important to figure out what might be a black hole in the first place. Under normal circumstances, if a character encounters something resembling a black hole, there will be a statement regarding that. If the statement is from a reliable source and it doesn't behave in an unrealistic manner as outlined previously, it can be safely assumed to be a proper black hole.
If for any reason the statement is unreliable, typical black hole properties such as bending light also outside the event horizon, having the appropriate gravitational pull for a black hole of its given size, displaying Hawking Radiation, and so on can help to support the statement.
3. Logias are stated to work and behave just like the real life element they're based on.. As such, since saying that a characters durability is infinite is usually an enormous outlier, surviving a singularity can extremely seldom be taken as a durability feat. It can only be understood as a feat for resistance against black holes.
If for any reason the statement is unreliable, typical black hole properties such as bending light also outside the event horizon, having the appropriate gravitational pull for a black hole of its given size, displaying Hawking Radiation, and so on can help to support the statement.
2. Things actually surviving arent in the standards stating to be an anti feat, the characters would just gain resistance to blackholes.
Blackbeard's element isn't "Black Hole". It's not the Black Hole Black Hole Fruit. His element is darkness.3. Logias are stated to work and behave just like the real life element they're based on.
Yet he himself said he can absorb light, so unless you’re saying light that is a centimeter away moving in a straight line to the side of his black hole will escape, this argument is voidBlackbeard's darkness hasn't actually bent any light yet.
Since we’re all black hole experts now, what is your measurement for the appropriate gravitational pull for a Black Hole of its size?And it has not exhibited the appropriate gravitational pull for a Black Hole of its size.
Ask DT, he’s the standard guySince we’re all black hole experts now, what is your measurement for the appropriate gravitational pull for a Black Hole of its size?
Chalk that up to a missing visual effect, as it still traps light, something that requires a black holes infinite gravity to achieve. ( also, as long has an object has mass, it bends light to begin with.)Blackbeard's darkness hasn't actually bent any light yet.
blackbeard can choose the level of destruction he causes with his df.And it has not exhibited the appropriate gravitational pull for a Black Hole of its size.
Ok, but literally all of blackbeards attacks are gravity based. combine that with the other statements and its obvious what oda was trying to replicate. blackhole isnt 1 syllable in japanese.The page doesn't say that anyone who can survive a Black Hole automatically gets Resistance to Black Holes.
Blackbeard's element isn't "Black Hole". It's not the Black Hole Black Hole Fruit. His element is darkness.
Check discordAsk DT, he’s the standard guy
OkCheck discord
it's due to the fact that oda states multiple times that they are the elements themseleves, as shown in the scans i posted above. They're shown in series to also have pretty much the same traits, aside for a few minor differences.I'm entirely neutral on this thread and the two positions argued, but I do have a question for those who are arguing this is an actual black hole in terms of composition.
What are y'all contentions with Blackbeard's Yami having similar properties to a black hole, such as the infinite gravitational pull that absorbs light, it being stated similar in effect to an actual black hole etc.. But not having the exact 1 to 1 composition of one? As from the evidence I've read through provided in the calc itself. Nothing inherently implies Yami's black hole needs to be equal in structure to an actual black hole for those properties to exist nor does logic demand it either. What exactly supports the composition interpretation more compared to it just having similar properties to one and that's it?
I can see it's being argued through deductive reasoning, which I'm fine with. But I would still like an answer to this question nonetheless.
and yet the pool of darkness also exists under ace himself.The "I'm not going to attack you just yet!" is said in response to Ace saying that Blackbeard's darkness is "nowhere near me."
A straightforward interpretation of that is that Blackbeard isn't attacking Ace because he didn't send his darkness to go out directly under Ace. If he had, then when he activated his Black Hole technique I expect that Ace would have gotten dragged down like everything else directly in contact with it. As for why Ace isn't getting caught up in it despite only being a few feet away? That could simply be due to Blackbeard's gravity not being literally as strong as a black hole, which would also be why he isn't making the area completely dark by absorbing all the light in the area.
Anyway, DT brought up the issue that we have standards about Black Holes which Blackbeard's ability does not appear to meet.
The main thing in the blog is to utilize the fact that it is stated to attract light in the same manner as black holes, and finding the mass from that.I'm entirely neutral on this thread and the two positions argued, but I do have a question for those who are arguing this is an actual black hole in terms of composition.
What are y'all contentions with Blackbeard's Yami having similar properties to a black hole, such as the infinite gravitational pull that absorbs light, it being stated similar in effect to an actual black hole etc.. But not having the exact 1 to 1 composition of one? As from the evidence I've read through provided in the calc itself. Nothing inherently implies Yami's black hole needs to be equal in structure to an actual black hole for those properties to exist nor does logic demand it either. What exactly supports the composition interpretation more compared to it just having similar properties to one and that's it?
I can see it's being argued through deductive reasoning, which I'm fine with. But I would still like an answer to this question nonetheless.
"I don't think it works"It also has an infinite gravitational pull that keeps any light from escaping. This part of the technique is similar to that of a celestial black hole.
Funnily enough in this you can't pull out Dan's argument of "A statement can very, VERY easily be overruled by things going contrary to it." Which I still don't fully agree but not the point because the point is that damage doesn't even can use that argument"How come this power the guy stated can do things only at his command doesn't do things outside of his command."
Some of you guys are hilarious. The fact that he took out an entire town minus 1 single small target. Him devouring a squad of guards through darkness while he and his crew walk through the same darkness in effect without being scathed whatsoever, shows how precise his gravitational ability can be. If it's stated to have infinite gravity, stated that light can't escape, stated similiar to a real life black hole in ALL ASPECTS BUT THE LIBERATION, why are we arguing against the author himself?
That's greatIt has only been stated that part of his technique is similar to a black hole. In many respects it is not similar to a black hole.
For me, more evidence is needed for it to be assumed as powerful as a black hole.
Also I don't think anyone has addressed the issue about the event horizon yet.
Darkness isn’t an elementlogias are literally stated to be exactly like the real like element
pretty much all of his powers are gravity manipulation, oda does 2 syllable names for fruit names, so thats why its called that, but its pretty obvious what "darkness" is referring toDarkness isn’t an element
I'm aware, but if he can control the output, then there's no evidence the gravity it releases is on par with the infinite gravity inside. That would actually perfectly explain why the actual things the gravity does is by no means on par to what you would predict something with infinite gravity inside to produce. (or in specific context with the gravity that would be produced if it were a black hole)Counterpoint: Blackbeard can choose what to affect with his yami yami no mi powers,so thats not really an anti-feat,
Wouldn't matter. Most of the planet would still fold in on him.ignoring the fact the op world is way larger than a regular earth sized planet
Any space manipulator can do the same. As said, gravity is spacetime curvature and you may as well treat it as such. You wouldn't say that a spacetime manipulator generates actual mass to bend spacetime.Adding the fact that the yami yami no mi also captures light ( which requires an escape velocity of FTL speeds,which requires a shit ton of gravity.)
Because it isn't a black hole and doesn't work like one in the ways that matter for the calc.If it behaves a lot like a black hole, and is clearly supposed to be portayed as one, why not treat it as such?
DT, did you not read where it explains in the same page how the mechanics of why black holes attract light due to the high density and mass is the same as to how Blackbeard does it?I'm aware, but if he can control the output, then there's no evidence the gravity it releases is on par with the infinite gravity inside. That would actually perfectly explain why the actual things the gravity does is by no means on par to what you would predict something with infinite gravity inside to produce. (or in specific context with the gravity that would be produced if it were a black hole)
Could be that he could release all the gravity and doesn't because it would inevitably kill himself. Or it could be that he can't draw out that much power to begin with.
In fact, seeing how Whitebeard's devil fruit is pretty clearly intended to have more brute force than the yami yami no mi (that's why Blackbeard wanted it), I dare say that I consider it being able to produce infinite force rather unlikely.
Wouldn't matter. Most of the planet would still fold in on him.
Any space manipulator can do the same. As said, gravity is spacetime curvature and you may as well treat it as such. You wouldn't say that a spacetime manipulator generates actual mass to bend spacetime.
Gravity manipulators generate gravity without any kind of corresponding mass.
Because it isn't a black hole and doesn't work like one in the ways that matter for the calc.
What bubble?I have a quick question. Why is it assumed that the event horizon of BB’s “BHs” are at the edge of his darkness bubble?
Because I didn't have shit else to work withI have a quick question. Why is it assumed that the event horizon of BB’s “BHs” are at the edge of his darkness bubble?
Well rather than assume that I wonder if we can take an on screen feat, calc the gravitational force at a distance, and then use the fact that gravity increases with distance squared as you get closer to the source to get a better estimateBecause I didn't have shit else to work with
If there is a better option then I'll change it to fit that, just saying we're working with a weird technique
That would make sense, but bb is implied to have full control over his fruit's infinite gravity.I'm aware, but if he can control the output, then there's no evidence the gravity it releases is on par with the infinite gravity inside. That would actually perfectly explain why the actual things the gravity does is by no means on par to what you would predict something with infinite gravity inside to produce. (or in specific context with the gravity that would be produced if it were a black hole)
Could be that he could release all the gravity and doesn't because it would inevitably kill himself. Or it could be that he can't draw out that much power to begin with.
In fact, seeing how Whitebeard's devil fruit is pretty clearly intended to have more brute force than the yami yami no mi (that's why Blackbeard wanted it), I dare say that I consider it being able to produce infinite force rather unlikely.
Guess that makes sense.Wouldn't matter. Most of the planet would still fold in on him.
Well yes, but most gravity/space time manipulators dont have a physical representation of their powers, see Fujitora in the exact same series, his grqavity manipulation is shown as a purple colored effect. Accuracy aside, the fact that the yami fruit powers are supposed to be a blackhole would mean that they would have mass.Any space manipulator can do the same. As said, gravity is spacetime curvature and you may as well treat it as such. You wouldn't say that a spacetime manipulator generates actual mass to bend spacetime.
Gravity manipulators generate gravity without any kind of corresponding mass.
It is the only one of the logia types that has a physical form
logias are the real-life element, also "but its darkness" has already been explained above.Because it isn't a black hole and doesn't work like one in the ways that matter for the calc.
Brother Oda already said that BB’s fruit isn’t exactly like a BH. So repeating the notion that Logia are their elements doesn’t really matter at all here, since the fruit isn’t literally a BH. That point isn’t really useful for either side of the debate. We know that light logia use light and can become light, etc with any other logia type.logias are the real-life element, also "but its darkness" has already been explained above.
Where exactly?Brother Oda already said that BB’s fruit isn’t exactly like a BH.
I wanna say KT put it in his blog, but it’s in a databook where they talk about how BB’s darkness works. You can ask KT for the scanWhere exactly?
Well, even assuming that "darkness" or "gravity" are even elements in the first place would be dubious. Darkness would be considered as an absence of an element rather than an actual element, such as fire or water. While gravity just clearly isn't an element, it's a fundamental property of our reality.it's due to the fact that oda states multiple times that they are the elements themseleves, as shown in the scans i posted above. They're shown in series to also have pretty much the same traits, aside for a few minor differences.
thats not his point. ( at least i dont think thats what it is)There's significantly more evidence behind Blackbeard's Devil Fruit having actual composition comparable to a black hole compared to Fujitora's Zushi Zushi Fruit.
Those aren't comparable. You shouldn't act like they are.
textbook definition of false equivalence.There is a gravity fruit its not a logia but he can manipulate gravity, might as well just assume both can create a black hole then
More than one fruit can control the same thing. Multiple fruits can control flames. Multiple fruits produce poison. Multiple fruits controls user's mass. It is absulutely wrong to say only one fruit can control gravity.The point is Blackbeard can control gravity because he doesn't have the gravity fruit yet he apparently can control the gravity of his black hole to only affect certain objects, it makes no sense.
Bro acting like there's not 50 fruits that do the same thing other 50 fruits doThe point is Blackbeard can control gravity because he doesn't have the gravity fruit yet he apparently can control the gravity of his black hole to only affect certain objects, it makes no sense.