- 4,387
- 6,961
I was responding to Bern asking if there were any similar feats
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
despite that Omni Man was far stronger than Mark, Mark still can hurt omni man, and Mark has no 5-C feats or even similar
People have been using KE here for ages, in most cases it contradicts what is actually shown, but nobody seems to mind.Its funny that KE contradicts the things that are put in the verse, the best feat in Invincible is literally the destruction of viltrun, which is High 6-A in the way that the feat was made (planet unstable + 3 people working together), so, if yall are gonna accept a feat from a meteor texas size with some absurd KE calc that the author doesnt even thinks on it to result a feat even bigger than Viltrun feat, thats literally the definition of Outlier
Also, I haven't seen the term "Outlier" used on this site for a long time now. Every feat is always legit.
KE is wrong because Mark and Nolan is supersonic, not relativisticKE is applicable as long as they move at quantifiable speeds simultaneously as they attack (the simplest example being the Flash running around the world and ramming someone).
Since Mark’s tackle was calculated at Relativistic wouldn’t he quantify?
Their feats say otherwiseKE is wrong because Mark and Nolan is only supersonic
in episode 1.Mark and nolan literally played catch by throwing a ball around the globe which took like 19 seconds to return. that was casual.
It was a joke manMark and nolan literally played catch by throwing a ball around the globe which took like 19 seconds to return. that was casual.
The only time Mark looked comparable to Nolan was in the fight against a kaiju, but honestly this is an outlier
Even before it got amped, it had Omni Man on the ropes like never before according to Donald/Bobby.heck even then Nolan actually did damage to it while Mark kinda just got tentacle hentai'd
I am unsurprised...And yes, there is hentai of this scene with Mark on rule 34
Ehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh........ We don't know enough for an accurate calc, so yes, but also no.For now, is Everyone agreed that the meteor is not an outlier?
Apply for kaiju and guardians (Although the durability is unknown)So, like, if this does get accepted it would only apply to Omni-Man, right? Maybe immortal, I guess? Immortal did put up some fight and did do damage.
oh my god, I literally explained that we do know about the feat, even if it's over time it was still in a quick timeframe so he'd scale any ways. he stopped and diverted the ENTIRE meteor so he's affecting the entire thing, not just part of itWe know way too little about the feat, Mark slowed the meteor over time so AP does not scale. For all we know he flew against the meteor to not tank the full ke of it.
This is literally based on assumptions. We got a single freakin' statement on it, we quite literally cannot know enough. We never saw it happen. It is literally impossible.oh my god, I literally explained that we do know about the feat, even if it's over time it was still in a quick timeframe so he'd scale any ways. he stopped and diverted the ENTIRE meteor so he's affecting the entire thing, not just part of it
we know how he did it, because he's showing mark HOW to divert a meteor, why would he show mark a different way to do it then the one that worked for him before? that makes no sense. "Assumptions" yea assumptions backed up by the show itself and actual evidence/logic.This is literally based on assumptions. We got a single freakin' statement on it, we quite literally cannot know enough. We never saw it happen. It is literally impossible.
Yeah, this calculation is wrong. The normal speed is 17km/s, not 30km/s![]()
Omni-Man Texas meteor
vsbattles.fandom.com