- 948
- 212
Now, this time I swear I'm not wanking the character. The Maker in it's level of omnipresence we could say that it's all things forever and ever. Literally. But besides its description of omnipresence in any part of the book describes it. We know that the narrator in a dream to "see" the whole cosmo making of The Maker but it never says "he stared me in the eyes with that absurd face of him" (I don't use "it" because in the book is refered as male -why?-) and even in the mature creating state its form is never refered to. Then, in the non physical cosmoses, we can say that it was never described as something that could be a "being" and even in the physical ones couldn't describe it. I think the Nonexistent Physiology is something accurate to be added since The Maker itself creates cosmoses that are adimensional in some cases, with physical shape and more than two time dimensions sometimes, but the thing is that The Maker's form it was never clarified.