Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What does that even mean?How is it unknown when you can calculate the value of the portion as if it were not a residual explosion?
They are clearly in the part below (the one which is narrow), so pixelscaling we can find out.
It's assuming the blast wave travelled as a sphere (not including the portion in the ground). I could probably find whatever shape this affront to god is, but even the bottom is cylindrical enough that my assumption is actually a huge low-ball.If you knew that being 10 meters away from the center would reduce the values to 1/600th, how can you not know how to calculate it?
They move around quite a bit.It's easy to find where King and the rest were right before the exlosion began.
This guy calculates all the feats from NNTI'll respond anyway just for clarification.
What does that even mean?
Also, there is no way to find the size of the explosion from this panel.
However, I could maybe use deflagration and assume the bottom cylinder is comparable to the size of mountain DK (which is hard to find in and of itself).
It's assuming the blast wave travelled as a sphere (not including the portion in the ground). I could probably find whatever shape this affront to god is, but even the bottom is cylindrical enough that my assumption is actually a huge low-ball.
They move around quite a bit.
Maybe I could assume it's centred on Diane.
Why? he calculates all the feats so it fineI've already addressed why that calculation is wrong.
Just skip to the seven deadly sins combo move he has the calculations you need.Why? he calculates all the feats so it fine
That doesn't matter if the calculation is wrong. What it doesn't take into account is perspective created by the fact that the Earth is spherical. For example, continents on a spherical map appear much larger than on a flat map because of the planet's curve.Why? he calculates all the feats so it fine
Then make a crt and calc this thenThat doesn't matter if the calculation is wrong. What it doesn't take into account is perspective created by the fact that the Earth is spherical. For example, continents on a spherical map appear much larger than on a flat map because of the planet's curve.
Also, that section of ground is way too small to use the Earth's curve.
Well it depends on the interpretation but you have my supportI'm planning to calculate it, but I strongly doubt it will amount to anything.
The first link literally says fanbook.
Oh sorry I thought you were implying the source was fanmade.The first link literally says fanbook.
The second one I can't find anything on.
Using surface area and explosion yield. You could also do inverse square law.But how would you calculate how much force King tanked?
No, they're made by Nakaba.Are fanbooks not fanmade? Someone said it was.
But since he only tanked shockwaves (for reasons already stated) and not a part of the attack's raw energy itself, how would we know how strong the shockwaves are?Using surface area and explosion yield. You could also do inverse square law.
It was x2 in the novels, so half that.We can't really scale their durability, anyway, because Merlin amped all their abilities to an unknown extent.
That's underwhelming, so low.I did a rough calculation for the explosion itself. The lowest result is just over baseline Large Mountain level, while the highest end isn't even Island level.
I'm not making a blog or calculating the durability of King's pollen garden because it's not worth it.
There's also an amp by Infinity, which can range from moderate to massive.It was x2 in the novels, so half that.
Given that there's little objection, I think adding Tsotso's scaling is fine.What do you think that we should do here ByAsura?
Okay. That is fine with me as well in that case.Given that there's little objection, I think adding Tsotso's scaling is fine.