Questions about ND2 and NEP2

[Absolutely_111~]

Could ND2 be NEP2? I will have a specific case.

• Firstly, ND2 will neither be A nor not A. In this case, A and not A will be the entire set of opposing pairs and mutual logical negations in the verse.

And one more question

• If a state of existence is said to be neither existence nor non-existence, is that NEP2?

Some people say that ND2 is a state of existence but not And also does not belong to a duality state (existence and non-existence).

They explain that even if NEP2 actually exists, it is not in a literal sense.

• They give an example in this case. Some characters exist in the form of NEP2, while some characters possess NEP2. At a glance, it seems they are not different in meaning.

Can someone help me answer a few questions?

 

[Absolutely_111~]

Bump

 

[ActuallySpaceMan42]

Could ND2 be NEP2? I will have a specific case.

• Firstly, ND2 will neither be A nor not A. In this case, A and not A will be the entire set of opposing pairs and mutual logical negations in the verse.

The character doesn't exist in a sense further beyond conventional nonexistence. In terms of binary, this would be something that is neither 1 nor 0, where 1 is existence and 0 is nonexistence. These characters often have some form of Nonduality due to their lack of binary existence.

Yes is stated on the NEP Page.

And one more question

• If a state of existence is said to be neither existence nor non-existence, is that NEP2?

Yes.

 

[Grabbing_dragon]

Yes.

He didn’t say they are in a state of nonexistence that is neither existence nor non-existence. So, no.

 

[Absolutely_111~]

He didn’t say they are in a state of nonexistence that is neither existence nor non-existence. So, no.

By the way, a stated state of existence that is not a duality (exist - nonexist)

Will anything change or not

• They give an example in this case. Some characters exist in the form of NEP2, while some characters possess NEP2. At a glance, it seems they are not different in meaning.

What do you think about this?

 

[ActuallySpaceMan42]

He didn’t say they are in a state of nonexistence that is neither existence nor non-existence. So, no.

As long as he's referring to dualities, A and not-A include Existence and Non-Existence, which would result in it being neither, hence NEP Type 2.

Technically, even calling the state between existence and non-existence, non-existent, is contradictory, so I don't think it's necessary for it to be stated as long as the unconventional duality is there.

 

[Absolutely_111~]

As long as he's referring to dualities, A and not-A include Existence and Non-Existence, which would result in it being neither, hence NEP Type 2.

Technically, even calling the state between existence and non-existence, non-existent, is contradictory, so I don't think it's necessary for it to be stated as long as the unconventional duality is there.

Yes. Can I understand this in this way?
An existing state is not a duality (existence and non-existence).
In this case, the logic of duality would not apply to that state. Thus, the existing state is just a name compared to what it is stated as.
The meaning here is that this state will not operate and will not adhere to the logic of existence and non-existence, therefore it will be NEP type 2.

Btw, Thank you very much for taking the time to answer my question.

 

[ActuallySpaceMan42]

In this case, the logic of duality would not apply to that state. Thus, the existing state is just a name compared to what it is stated as. The meaning here is that this state will not operate and will not adhere to the logic of existence and non-existence, therefore it will be NEP type 2.

Yeah.

 

[Absolutely_111~]

Yeah.

Alright, thank you once again.